Definite and Suspected Multiple Sclerosis in Children: Long-Term Follow-up and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings

Abstract

Twenty-five children at the ages of 3 to 18 years with an initial diagnosis of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis were followed in the Clinic of Child Neurology for a period of 2 to 8 years. In 10 children, there were data for clinically definite or laboratory-supported definite multiple sclerosis. The other 15 children in our study were considered as having suspected multiple sclerosis. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed in 15 children disclosed multiple hyperintense lesions on T₂-weighted imaging in 13 children: 10 with definite multiple sclerosis and 3 with suspected multiple sclerosis. The clinical manifestations did not always correspond to the size and location of the MRI lesions of demyelination. Follow-up revealed normalization of the neurologic examination in 18 patients (72%) and abnormal neurologic findings in 7 patients (28%) (6 children with definite multiple sclerosis and 1 with suspected multiple sclerosis). Magnetic resonance imaging follow-up in children with definite multiple sclerosis disclosed a reduction in the size of the lesions in 3; enlargement or new lesions were established in the other 7 cases, and 2 cases were without clinical signs of new attacks. Correlation was done concerning the findings of the cerebrospinal fluid examination, transcranial magnetic stimulation, evoked potentials, computed tomography, and MRI. The role of MRI for an early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in children is discussed. The dynamic follow-up of the pathologic changes is of prognostic significance for the course of the disease that could be a definite cessation of the process in acute disseminated encephalomyelitis cases or transition to multiple sclerosis. (J Child Neurol 2001;16:317-324).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gall JC , Hayles AB , Siekert RG , Keith HM : Multiple sclerosis in children. A clinical study of 40 cases with onset in childhood. Pediatrics 1958;21:703-709.

Hanefeld F. : Multiple sclerosis in childhood. Curr Opin Neurol Neurosurg 1992;5:359-363.

Duquette P. , Murray TJ , Pleines J. , et al: Multiple sclerosis in childhood: Clinical profile in 125 patients . J Pediatr 1987;111:359-363.

Vergani MC , Reimao R. , Silva C. , et al: Multiple sclerosis with early childhood onset. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 1988;46:195-197.

Ruggieri M. , Polizzi A. , Pavone L. , Grimaldi LM : Multiple sclerosis in children under 6 years of age. Neurology 1999;53:478-484.

Brandt S. , Gyldenstern C. , Offner H. , et al: Multiple sclerosis with onset in a two year old boy. Neuropediatrics 1981;12:75-82.

Poser CM , Paty DW , Scheinberg L. , et al: New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983;13:227-231.

O Connor P. , Tansey C. , Kucharczyk W. , Detsky AS : A randomized trial of test result sequencing in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis. Rochester-Toronto MRI Study Group. Arch Neurol 1994; 51:53-59.

Paty DW , Oger Jjf , Kastrukoff LF , et al: MRI in the diagnosis of MS: A prospective study with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT. Neurology 1988; 38:180-185.

10.

Kesselring J. , Miller DH , Robb SA , et al: Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. MRI findings and the distinction from multiple sclerosis. Brain 1990;113:291-302.

11.

Fazekas F. , Offenbacher H. , Fuchs S. , et al: Criteria for an increased specificity of MRI interpretation in elderly subjects with suspected multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1988;38:1822-1825.

12.

Barkhof F. , Filippi M. , Miller DH , et al: Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Brain 1997;120:2059-2069.

13.

Offenbacher H. , Fazekas F. , Schmidt R. , et al: Assessment of MRI criteria for a diagnosis of MS. Neurology 1993;43:905-909.

14.

Kuroda Y. , Matsui M. , Yukitare M. , et al: Assessment of MRI criteria for MS in Japanese MS and HAM/TSP . Neurology 1995;45:30-33.

15.

Huk WJ , Gademann G. , Friedmann G. : Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Central Nervous System Diseases. Berlin, Springer-Verlag 1990,206-210.

16.

Martinelli V. , Rodegher M. , Filippi M. , et al: Brain MRI follow-up of patients with persistent isolated optic neuritis. Eur J Neurol 1996;3:36-39.

17.

Mushlin AI , Detsky AS , Phelps CE , et al: The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis. JAMA 1993;269:3146-3151.

18.

Lucchinetti CF , Kiers L. , O'Duffy A. , et al: Risk factors for developing multiple sclerosis after childhood optic neuritis. Neurology 1997;49:1413-1418.

19.

Morrissey SP , Miller DH , Kendall BE , et al: The significance of brain MRI abnormalities at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. A 5-year follow-up study. Brain 1993;116:135-146.

20.

Palo J. , Ketonen L. , Wikstrom J. : A follow-up study of very low field MRI findings and clinical course in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 1988;84:177-187.

21.

Baum K. , Nehrig C. , Schorner W. , Girke W. : Periventricular plaques in multiple sclerosis: Irreversible? An MRI follow-up study. Eur Neurol 1992;32:219-221.

22.

O'Riordan JL , Thompson AJ , Kingsley DP , et al: The prognostic value of brain MRI in clinically isolated syndromes of the CNS. A 10-year follow-up. Brain 1988;121:495-503.

23.

Chiappa KH : Use of evoked potentials for diagnosing of multiple sclerosis. Neurol Clin 1988;6:861-880.

24.

Rossini PM , Caramia M. , Zarola F. , et al: Sensory (VEP, BAEP, SEP) and motor evoked potentials, liquoral and magnetic resonance findings in multiple sclerosis. Eur Neurol 1989;29:41-47.