The aims of this study were (1) to define the role of long-term computer-assisted outpatient electroencephalographic monitoring (COEEG) in children and adolescents with known or suspected epilepsy, and (2) to compare COEEG data with routine interictal electroencephalograms (EEG). We performed 18-channel COEEG in 84 children and adolescents with diagnosed (group 1, n = 49) or suspected (group 2, n = 35) epilepsy. Mean recording time was 1.4 days. Overall, COEEG was useful in 87% of patients. In group 1, events were recorded in 73% of patients and were electrographic seizures in 45%. In group 2, events were detected in 86% of patients and were electrographic seizures in 17%. Nocturnal and partial seizures predominated. Seizure diagnosis and classification by COEEG was concordant with interictal EEG findings in 19% and discordant in 63% of patients. COEEG is a useful technique for the diagnosis of epileptic and nonepileptic events among selected children and adolescents. When compared to routine interictal EEG, COEEG could offer additional accuracy in the classification of seizures in pediatric patients. (J Child Neurol 2000;15:49-55).
Bridgers SL: Evaluation of episodes of altered awareness or behavior, in Ebersole JS (ed): Ambulatory EEG Monitoring . New York, Raven Press, 1989, pp 217-230.
3.
Petersen I., Eeg-Olofsson O:The development of the electroencephalogram in normal children from the age of 1 through 15 years non-paroxysmal activity. Neuropadiatrie1971;2:247-304.
4.
Westmoreland BF:Normal and benign EEG patterns. Am J EEG Technol1982;22:3-31.
5.
Klass D., Westmoreland B:Non-epileptogenic epileptiform electroencephalographic activity. Ann Neurol1985;18:627-635.
6.
Kramer U., Carmant S., Holmer S., et al: Psychogenic seizures in children and adolescents: Video-telemetry observations in 21 patients, abstract. Ann Neurol1993;34:452.
7.
Gumnit RJIntensive neurodiagnostic monitoring: Role in the treatment of seizures. Neurology1986;36:1340-1346.
8.
Mitchell WG, Chen LS, Horton EJ, Carter Snead III O.: Clinical utility of video EEG in seizures, epilepsy, and other paroxysmal events in infants and children, abstract. Ann Neurol1992;32:433.
9.
Kim HD, Clancy RR:Sensitivity of a seizure activity detector computer in childhood video/electroencephalographic monitoring. Epilepsia1997;38:1192-1197.
Bridgers SL , Ebersole JS: Cassette electroencephalography, in Wyllie E (ed): The Treatment of Epilepsy: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1993, pp 278-284.
20.
Gotman J:Seizure recognition and analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1985;(Suppl 37):133-145.
21.
Gotman J:Practical use of computer-assisted EEG interpretation in epilepsy: Seizures on the EEG. J Clin Neurophysiol1985;2:251-265.
22.
Ives JR:Ambulatory EEG monitoring: Current state of the art of event type recorders and their future application. J Ambulat Monit1989;2:183-189.
23.
Morris GL, Galezowska J., Leroy R., North R:The results of computer-assisted ambulatory 16-channel EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1994;91:229-231.
24.
Liporace J. , Tatum IV W., Morris III GL, French J:Clinical utility of sleep-deprived versus computer-assisted ambulatory 16-channel EEG in epilepsy patients: A multicenter study. Epilepsy Res1998;32:357-362.
25.
Qu H., Gotman J:Improvement in seizure detection performance by automatic adaptation to the EEG of each patient. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1993;86:79-87.
Drury I., Henry TR:Ictal patterns in generalized epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol1993;10:268-280.
28.
Kaibara M., Blume WT:The postictal electroencephalogram. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1988;70:99-104.
29.
Walczak TS, Radtke RA, Lewis DV:Accuracy and interobserver reliability of scalp ictal EEG. Neurology1992;42:2279-2285.
30.
Rak IW, Zveitel NA:Computer-assisted ambulatory EEG monitoring with seizure and spike detection algorithms increased yield compared to ambulatory cassette EEG monitoring, abstract. Neurology1994;44(Suppl 2):S233.
31.
Ebersole JSClinical utility of cassette EEG in adult seizure disorders, in Ebersole JS (ed): Ambulatory EEG Monitoring . New York, Raven Press, 1989, pp 111-127.
32.
Schoemaker AP, Legido A., Foley CM, et al: Parents' diagnostic perception of seizures in their epileptic children: A video EEG study, abstract. Epilepsia1994;35(Suppl 8):S106.
33.
Meierkord H. , Will B., Fish D., Shorvon S:The clinical features and prognosis of pseudoseizures diagnosed using video-EEG telemetry. Neurology1991;41:1643-1646.
34.
Gerken H., Kiefer R., Doose H., Vslzke E:Genetic factors in childhood epilepsy with focal sharp waves. Neuropadiatrie1977;8: 10-20.
Hauser WA, Hesdorffer DC:Incidence and prevalence, in Hauser WA, Hesdorffer DC (eds): Epilepsy: Frequency, Causes and Consequences. New York, Demos Press, 1990, pp 1—51.
37.
Morris GL:The clinical utility of computer-assisted ambulatory 16 channel EEG. J Med Eng Technol1997;21:47-52.
38.
Miles DK, Foley CM, Legido A., et al: A comparative study of the efficacy of inpatient video EEG and computerized outpatient longterm EEG monitoring in a pediatric population, abstract. Epilepsia1994;35(Suppl 8):S48.
