A six-year experience of the first cassetteless radiology department has shown that it produces considerable improvement in speed and efficiency of patient handling, reduced physical labor for the technician, and substantial financial savings, amounting to approximately one third of the total non-medical budget.
This is contrasted with the potential cost of a totally digital (filmless) department. The digital acquisition devices and their image processing systems are considerably more expensive. Image display comparable to conventional radiographs (for example the full-sized chest film) is markedly inferior in resolution and totally prohibitive in cost. Image storage and recall of the same amount of data as currently handled by the conventional department are presently beyond the capabilities of any commercial communications system, and the potential cost is completely unacceptable. Projections of the imminent advent of the filmless department are grossly over-optimistic, whereas the development of cassetteless systems offers an alternative route to improved patient handling and increased cost-efficiency.
RiderWD.The 1975 Gordon Richards Memorial Lecture: Is the Miles operation really necessary for the treatment of rectal cancer?Can Assoc Radiol1975;26:167–175.
2.
DonC, DalyR.The first cassetteless x-ray department. Electromedica1981;49:144–148.
3.
CappMP, RoehrigH, SeeleyGW, FisherHD, OvittTW.The digital radiology department of the future. Radiol Clin North Am1985;23:349–355.
4.
MacovskiA, BrodyWR, LehmannL.Future trends in projection radiography: recent and future developments in medical imaging. II. S.P.I.E. 1979;206:19–26.
5.
HuebenerKH.Scanned projection radiography of the chest versus standard film radiography: a comparison of 250 cases. Radiology1983;148:363–368.
6.
BjörkholmPJ.AnnisM, FrederickEE.Dig ital radiography: application of optical instrumentation in medicine. IX. S.P.I.E. 1980;273:137–144.
7.
TesicMM, MattsonRA, BarnesGT, SonesRA, StickneyJB.Digital radiography of the chest: design features and considerations for a prototype unit. Radiology1983;148:259–264.
8.
KheddacheS.ManssonLG, SchlossmanD, TylénU.Digital chest radiography with a large-screen image intensifier. Electromedica1987;55:21–27.
9.
PowellT.Chest radiography using a large-image intensifier. Electromedica 1987. 55:9-13. 10. SonodaM, TakanoM, MiyaharaJ.KatoH.Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Radiology1983;148:833–838.
10.
MerrittCRB, MatthewsCC.ScheinhornD, BalterS.Digital imaging of the chest. J Thorac Imag1985;1:1–13.
11.
SommerFG, SmathersRL, WheatRL, AlvarezRE, BrodyWR, CasselDM.Digital processing of film radiographs. AJR1985;144:191–196.
12.
FraserRG, HickeyNM.NikalsonLT.SabbaghEA.LunaRF, AlexanderCB, RobinsonCA, KatzensteinALA, BarnesGT.Calcification in pulmonary nodules: detection with dual-energy digital radiography. Radiology1986;160:595–601.
13.
McNeillKM, FajardoLL, HunterTB.Design and evaluation of digital image workstations. Appl Radiol1987;16:31, 33, 66.
14.
GreinacherCFC, FuchsD, MüllerK.PACS — a topic of the future becomes reality. Electromedica1985;96–103.
15.
GrayJE, KarsellPR, BeckerGP, GehringDG.Total digital radiology: is it feasible?or desirable? AJR1984;143:1345–1349.
