GelardiFRagainiEMSolliniMBernardiDChitiA.Contrast-enhanced mammography versus breast magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(8):1890.
2.
MoffaGGalatiFMaroncelliR, et al. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced digital mammography versus conventional imaging in women with dense breasts. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(15):2520.
3.
van NijnattenTJALobbesMBICozziAPatelBKZuleyMLJochelsonMS.Barriers to implementation of contrast-enhanced mammography in clinical practice: AJR Expert Panel narrative review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023;221(1):3-6.
4.
XiangWRaoHZhouL.A meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Thorac Cancer. 2020;11(6):1423-1432.
5.
BergWAVargoALuAH, et al. Screening for breast cancer with contrast-enhanced mammography as an alternative to MRI: SCEMAM trial results. Radiology. 2025;315(3):e242634.
6.
GilbertFJPayneNRAllajbeuI, et al. Comparison of supplemental breast cancer imaging techniques-interim results from the BRAID randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2025;405(10493):1935-1944.
7.
KellowZKulkarniSGordonPBSeelyJM.Canadian Society Breast Imaging position statement on mammographic breast density and supplemental screening. J Breast Imaging. Published online February 10, 2026. doi:10.1093/jbi/wbaf064
8.
EisenAFletcherGGFienbergS, et al. Breast magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2024;75(1):118-135.
9.
GoseinMYong-HingCJJohalPMarCMartinT.Contrast-enhanced mammography for detection and characterization of invasive lobular carcinoma. Can Assoc Radiol J. Published online December 24, 2025. doi:10.1177/08465371251398520
