Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

French

Abdominal emergencies in cancer patients encompass a wide spectrum of oncologic conditions caused directly by malignancies, paraneoplastic syndromes, reactions to the chemotherapy or often represent the first clinical manifestation of an unknown malignancy. Not rarely, clinical symptoms are the tip of an iceberg. In this scenario, the radiologist is asked to exclude the cause responsible for the patient’s symptoms, to suggest the best way to manage and to rule out the underlying malignancy. In this article, we discuss some of the most common abdominal oncological emergencies that may be encountered in an emergency department.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

cancer abdomen emergencies imaging CT

Introduction

Due to the rapidly increasing elderly population, there has been an increase in the diagnosis of cancer and a rise in oncological emergencies. Oncologic emergencies can result from local effects of the primary tumour, its metastases, paraneoplastic syndromes, or reaction to the chemotherapeutic agents.^{1

–11} Many oncological emergencies are signs of advanced, stage IV disease, but occasionally patients present to the emergency department (ED) with a previously unknown primary tumour responsible for acute clinical symptoms. Imaging plays a crucial role in both the initial diagnosis and therapeutic decision process. Depending on the severity, type and localization of the clinical symptoms, the initial imaging evaluation in the ED traditionally begins with a chest radiograph, abdominal radiograph, or abdominal ultrasound (US) because of their wide availability, low cost, and minimal or no exposure to radiation.¹² However, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan is the imaging modality of choice in the evaluation of oncological patient presenting to the ED with an acute abdomen^12
–14 Figure 1.

Figure 1.

56 year old woman who presents with shortness of breath, abdominal discomfort, and back pain. On examination, she has frank ascites. (A, B, C) Axial contrast-enhanced MDCT scans show a large heterogenous mass of ovarian origin in the right iliac fossa, with evidence of the right ovarian vein seen entering the mass (B), moderate volume of ascites with large volume omental caking (C) and a serosal deposit on the surface of the liver (D, arrow).

Abdominal pain and acute abdomen are common presentations of several intraabdominal oncological-related conditions and may constitute the first presentation of cancer or may be due to disease complication.¹⁰ The signs and symptoms include fever, elevated white blood cell count, intestinal obstruction, peritonitis, anemia, elevated liver enzymes, jaundice, renal failure, hematuria, and intestinal obstruction.¹⁵

In this article, we will review the common abdominal oncological emergencies which are encountered frequently in the ED and the role of radiologists in the emergency setting.

Obstruction

Cancer patients can experience symptoms of obstruction of different structures due to various causes.⁹ A substantial number of obstructions is benign in nature and not caused by tumour mass.^16

–21

Obstruction of the Gastrointestinal Tract

Obstruction can occur anywhere along the gastrointestinal tract. In some cases, this represents the initial symptom of a neoplasm, whereas in others it develops during the course of disease. A malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) can be defined as 1 of the following: clinical evidence of bowel obstruction (by history, physical, and/or x-ray examination); bowel obstruction beyond the ligament of Treitz in the setting of a diagnosis of intra-abdominal neoplasm; or a diagnosis of extra-abdominal primary cancer with clear intraperitoneal disease.¹⁴ As a result, many therapeutic options can be offered for these patients, and because MBOs rarely need to be managed urgently, the whole clinical team, patient, and family have time to consider these options in the perspective of the patient’s goals of care and underlying load of disease.^15

–20

Obstructions can be classified as either partial or complete. In partial obstruction, gas or liquid stool can pass through the point of intestinal narrowing. With complete obstruction, no content can pass. Such obstructions can be secondary to mechanical or functional disease. Mechanical obstructions can be classified as intraluminal (enlarging primary or secondary tumour), intramural (infiltration of the bowel wall), or extramural (extrinsic compression from masses, nodes, or adhesions).¹ Functional obstruction is characterized by an ileus (ie, spastic, hypotonic or paralytic ileus).¹⁹ This can result from tumour infiltration of the mesentery that affects the bowel wall muscle and nerves, or it can be induced by the many pain medications used by this population. Ileus may also result from a paraneoplastic neuropathy, particularly in patients with lung cancer.¹ In the context of a mechanical obstruction, distinction should be made between simple and closed-loop obstruction.^21

–27 This is not just a theoretical distinction, because it has critical implications on management and patient’ outcome. Simple obstruction occurs when the intestinal lumen is partially or completely occluded at 1 or more points, thus resulting in a proximal dilatation and distal collapse of the bowel. In contrast, closed-loop obstruction occurs from 2 sequential occlusions at 2 adjacent points.

Small-bowel obstruction is 1 of the more frequent causes of acute abdomen, representing 20% of all surgical admissions for acute abdominal pain.¹⁹ The incidence of intestinal obstruction due to neoplasm accounts for approximately 5%-15%.^26,27 Small bowel obstruction is more common than large bowel obstruction.²¹ Small-bowel neoplasms are quite unusual. This may represent a diagnostic challenge since they usually present with nonspecific symptoms resulting in diagnostic delay with development of carcinomatosis, advanced stage IV disease, direct invasion or lymphatic system and hematogenous metastases.²

Abdominal plain radiography should be performed as initial radiologic screening for suspected bowel obstruction as it has 60%-93% sensitivity in the diagnosis.

US is usually performed as first-line examination, as it is non-invasive, promptly available, and easily performed. US is a valid adjunct to plain film to define the presence of free fluid and to distinguish between functional (spastic, hypotonic and paralytic ileus) from mechanical obstruction looking at peristalsis and intestinal wall thickness.¹⁹ This is important to establish if surgery is needed and the timing of intervention.^22,23

Contrast-enhanced CT is indicated for as overall assessment of the neoplastic obstruction and its complications.^22

–26 The contrast-enhanced CT allows rapid assessment of the features of bowel obstructions including variation of wall enhancement which can show increased of decreased attenuation compared to the loops not involved in the obstructing process, determining the need for a prompt surgical approach.^24,25

The most common protocol in our centers include portal venous phase scan with injection of 80-120 mL nonionized iodinated IV contrast agent followed by 20 mL of saline solution, at 3-5 mL/s with scanning from the diaphragm to the symphysis pubis.

Intravenous contrast medium administration is essential for assessing intestinal loop enhancement and mesenteric vascular supply.^2,25,26

The axial slice is typically thin (1.5 mm) for all pre- and post-contrast acquisitions, but further thick-slice 3.75 mm axial and other 3 to 5 mm coronal and sagittal planes (MPR and MIP) are obtained in order to get the transition zone localizatio), and then possible identify the obstruction cause, visualizing the “bowel and mesenteric complex”. The use of oral contrast material is controversial and usually not administrated in the first assessment of a SBO.²⁸

Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) has a high accuracy for the diagnosis of severe SBO (almost 95%) but it is less sensitive and specific in case of partial obstruction (with a variable range of 83-100% in sensitivity and 61-93% in specificity).^{2,24

–27,29}

Because of the multitude of differential diagnoses (ranging from bleeding hypervascular metastases to carcinomatosis), more recent publications have investigate the role of biphasic CT protocol in suspected small bowel obstruction at the emergency department. The positive predictive value of biphasic MDCT accounts for 92.9% for AMI, indicating the possibility to reduce patient radiation dose, numbers of images to review and unnecessary delays in patient work-up.²⁵

Large bowel obstruction (LBO) is much less common than SBO and frequently caused by an underlying malignancy. Other etiologies include diverticulitis and volvulus of the sigmoid colon or cecum. In the setting of a malignant LBO, the cause is frequently an intraluminal tumour growth, but it can also be the result of intussusception from a neoplastic leading point. Up to 20% of patients with colorectal cancer develop a LBO, which can have a substantial morbidity and mortality. Postoperatively, up to 25% of patients with a colorectal cancer resection develop a LBO.^2,30 Similar to SBO, mechanical obstruction of the large bowel causes bowel dilatation above the site of obstruction but it usually takes longer time for patient to present with symptoms of obstruction. Therefore, it rarely is an emergency until in the latest stages (for example, a stenosing cancer causing caecal dilatation over 8 cm) (Figure 2).² Furthermore, it is crucial for the team to distinguish between LBO and non-obstructive causes of large bowel dilation, such as a toxic megacolon. In this context, serial plain films play a crucial role to monitor evolution of disease.³⁰

Figure 2.

69 year old man presenting with fecaloid vomiting, abdominal distention and bloody stools. (A) Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows a large solid mass in the descending colon (circle) obstructing the upstream large bowel. Note the large dilatation of the ascending colon exceeding 8 cm which indicates the need for an emergency laparotomy. (B) Sagittal MPR reconstruction offers a different spatial perspective of the colonic lesion (circle) and the obstructed large and small bowel loops.

The latter refers to dilation of the colon associated with acute colitis, either segmental or diffuse, without associated mechanical obstruction. A wide range of etiologies can result in acute colitis including inflammation, ischemia, infection or radiation. Symptoms of LBO may develop over several days.

Depending on the patency of the ileocecal valve, these symptoms can eventually progress to nausea and vomiting. Contrast-enhanced CT is the gold standard in the emergency setting to detect the site of obstruction, the extent of the primary malignancy or distant metastases which affect the subsequent procedural planning.³⁰

Bowel Perforations

Bowel perforations is 1 of the most serious complication of gastrointestinal tumour. It requires prompt diagnosis and surgical treatment as it is frequently associated with sepsis.^3
–5

Clinical presentation is variable, especially if the patients are old or severely ill, but it usually presents as an “acute abdomen.” In oncologic patient, perforation may be due to the necrosis of the neoplastic bowel wall that is caused by a rapid growth and lack of blood supply, or secondary to chemotherapeutic agents.³¹ Gastrointestinal tumour perforation causes severe septic status but also spread of cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity with poor prognosis.

Chest and abdominal radiographs are the most frequently requested imaging modality even if their role is limited.²⁸ In the context of peritonitis, the detection of free intraperitoneal air on the radiograph is usually related to bowel perforation.²⁹ However, it should be remembered that abdominal free gas and bowel perforation are not always connected and free air can be related to thoracic, mediastinal and/or retroperitoneal issues. The specificity of radiograph for pneumoperitoneum is 50%-89.2%, but the site of perforation is almost never identified.¹⁹ Contrast-enhanced CT is the imaging modality of choice for identifying the presence, location, and cause of bowel perforation.²⁹ The CT diagnosis of bowel perforation is based on direct CT findings, such as discontinuity of the bowel wall (a rare finding) and the presence of extraluminal air as well as indirect CT findings, such as bowel wall thickening, abnormal bowel wall enhancement, abscess, and inflammatory mass adjacent to the bowel or an ileus. Scrutinizing and comparing the axial scans and MPRs to look for the site of perforation is essential. Of note that in many cases the site of bowel perforation remain unknown even at CT.²¹ Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that in many cases abdominal plain radiographs and/or even initial CT may show no gas or fluid in the peritoneal cavity at all but just an ileus.

Intestinal Infarctions

Mesenteric ischemia in oncologic patients may develop due to the direct involvement of vascular structures by the neoplasm, paraneoplastic syndrome causing hypercoagulability and consequent embolism or thrombosis of the mesenteric vessels, or secondary vascular involvement in malignant bowel obstruction.² Mesenteric ischemia includes acute arterial mesenteric ischemia, acute venous mesenteric ischemia, non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia, ischemia or reperfusion injury and ischemic colitis. Symptoms may be subtle and difficult to recognize since they are unspecific and may mimic other pathological conditions.^32

–37 Early diagnosis is important to improve survival rates. In most cases of late or missed diagnosis, the mortality rate from intestinal infarction is very high, with a reported value ranging from 60% to 90%.^31,36,37 MDCT is a crucial examination that should be immediately done in all patients with a suspicious ischemic bowel.^38
–40 Its diagnostic yield is much improved compared to the past and currently it is superior to that of any other noninvasive technique.^39,40 Contrast-enhanced CT can differentiate occlusive mesenteric ischemia vs non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia, which may have different therapeutic implications and options. Furthermore, contrast-enhanced CT is absolutely crucial to make any alternative diagnosis requiring a prompt surgical assessment, which is particularly useful in the cancer and elderly population.^{31

–42}

Abdominal Bleeding

Bleeding complications in cancer patients may be secondary to coagulation disorders, tumour rupture, or vascular involvement from neoplasm. Abdominal bleeding is a rare complication that may be fatal, so prompt diagnosis and treatment are required.

Spontaneous bleeding can occur mainly in hypervascular tumours, primarily localized peripherally and/or in subcapsular parenchymal spaces, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and metastasis from melanoma.^43
–45 Figure 3. Furthermore, patients with hematologic malignancies may present with spontaneous hepatic or splenic rupture. Hepatocellular carcinoma is complicated by rupture with intraperitoneal hemorrhage in 3%-15% cases resulting in about 70% mortality, and renal cell carcinoma, most commonly the clear cell variant, is similarly complicated in .3%-1.4% of cases.² Figure 4. If abdominal haemorrhage is suspected, contrast-enhanced CT is the examination of choice allowing to detect the site of bleeding, its severity, and whether it is arterial or venous.⁴³ If it is arterial, digital angiography of the visceral arteries may confirm the source and allow the embolization of the bleeding vessel. However, when choosing the CT protocol (monophasic vs biphasic protocol), it should be desirable to know the histological type of cancer.⁴⁴ In cases of melanoma, breast cancer, papillary thyroid carcinoma, lung cancer, HCC, GIST, or RCC, it is essential to adopt a biphasic protocol (with an arterial phase) to avoid missing or confusing hypervascular metastasis.^2,45

Figure 3.

80 year old man admitted with abdominal pain, sweats and dropping haemoglobin. The patient had an excised melanoma in the right goin 15 years earlier. (A, B, C). Axial contrast-enhanced CT scans acquired in the arterial phase demonstrates hypervascular lesions within the lumen of the gallbladder (A, arrow) and the small bowel. Note that in the portal phase these lesions appear hysodense and could be easily misinterpreted as fecal matter.

Figure 4.

65 year old man presenting with abdominal pain and shock. No hepatic cirrhosis or any other disease in his previous medical history. (A) Contrast-enhanced MDCT shows a large hypervascular solid lesion at the segment IV of the liver and a further relatively small lesion at segment I (B, arrows) consistent with multifocal HCC associated with a jet of active bleeding and a large volume of mixed density ascites with clotted blood (B, C) in the peritoneal cavity.

Urinary Obstruction

Urinary obstruction in oncologic patients can occur from primary urothelial and renal cancer, extensive disease of pelvic or retroperitoneal organs or inflammatory or fibrotic involvement of the ureters after chemo- or radiotherapy.⁴⁶

Ureteral obstruction may arise from direct infiltration or compression or adhesion, and can be unilateral or bilateral depending on the location of the obstruction.

Usually the obstruction develops slowly, therefore symptoms are nonspecific including abdominal pain localized to the right or left abdomen, with progressive dilation of the ureters, leading to eventual kidney failure. Depending on the nature, duration and location of the obstruction, anuria or hematuria can occur.⁴⁷

Imaging evaluation includes assessment of the thickness of the renal cortex (ie, cortical renal thinning is related to a degree of renal failure), the severity of hydronephrosis, the level and cause of ureteral obstruction, and degree of obstruction to consider the best treatment options.⁴⁶ In most cases, US is the first imaging modality.⁴⁷ Key points in US evaluation include establishing the obstruction level, assessing soft-tissue neoplasm, calculi or sludge and assessing whether the obstruction is partial or complete. US is very good tool at estimating the grade of hydronephrosis, detecting stones or sludge, even if sometimes it may not be able to determine whether stones are in in the middle third of the ureter.⁴⁷ It can be challenging to correctly assess soft-tissue mass with gray scale US, so color-Doppler may be helpful.^47,48 CT urogram is the examination of choice, providing valuable information on the type and level of obstruction, its extension, complications and is a valuable technique for a tailored management approach and staging. (Figure 5).^46,47,49

Figure 5.

72 year old man presenting with hematuria, discomfort and pelvic pain. (A) CT urography shows right hydronephrosis caused by a soft tissue lesion within the right pelvic ureter with adjacent periureteral fat stranding (B). Coronal and sagittal MPR images give the overall spatial assessment of the full extent of the mass and upstream ureteral dilatation (C, D).

Biliary Obstruction

Patients with malignant biliary obstruction usually have a bad prognosis. Biliary obstruction in oncological patients is often caused by pancreatic adenocarcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, peri-ampullary neoplasms, or metastatic lymphadenopathyat the porta hepatis. Biliary obstruction may also result from postoperative complication of biliary stent obstruction, migration or due to stenosis of biliary anastomosis.⁴

US is usually the first imaging modality in the clinical algorithm in patients with right upper abdominal pain, and the clinical suspicion for biliary obstruction.

Occasionally, the patient presents at ED with a previously unknown malignancy which is causing biliary obstruction and the diagnosis is initially made by a first line US. US can identify the degree of biliary dilation, level of obstruction, and cause of the obstruction.

The dilation of intrahepatic or extrahepatic ducts or the involvement of pancreatic duct can be assessed to determine the level of obstruction and identify treatment options.

CT shows and characterizes the underlying cause and complications, guiding towards the appropriate management. CT should be performed with intravenous contrast to evaluate the full extension of a neoplasm, its surgical resectability and staging (Figure 6). MR is a valuable tool to evaluate the biliary tract, as it helps in identifying the cause of biliary obstruction, but its role in emergency context appears quite limited.¹²

Figure 6.

52 year old lady presenting with jaundice and itching (A) Axial contrast-enhanced MDCT and coronal MPR image (B) show intra-/extrahepatic biliary tree and gallbladder dilatation caused by a large pancreatic head necrotic mass in keeping with a pancreatic carcinoma. The lesion was considered surgically unresectable due to direct vessel involvement, therefore a biliary stent was placed. After a 3 days, the patient developed sudden abdominal pain and, therefore, a follow-up CT scan was performed. (C) Axial CT scan demonstrates an appropriate placement of the biliary stent and decompression of the biliary tree, but a pancreatitis at the tail (arrows) with small amount of fluid in the left pararenal space.

If cholangitis is associated with biliary dilation, drainage should be made immediately. Drainage can be done percutaneously or endoscopically. Percutaneous biliary drainage can be performed for any case of biliary obstruction. Endoscopic drainage with stent insertion alleviates obstruction in patients with pancreatic head malignancy^48,50 (Figure 6).

Radiation Enteritis

Radiation enteritis occurs in patients receiving a radio-therapeutic treatment of the abdomen and/or pelvis during the course of their planned cancer treatment.^{51

–60} This entity is characterized by diffuse collagen infiltration and microvascular changes that results in a local narrowing of the intestinal lumen.^{48,50

–54}

There is a bowel dilation proximal to affected segments and progressive mucosal damage resulting in a bowel ulceration, perforation, and massive gastrointestinal bleeding. Pelvic irradiation, where the greatest volume of bowel is affected, is predominantly used in the treatment of gynecologic and urologic cancers.^{48

–57} A recent study showed 50% incidence of radiation bowel damage among their cohort of 12,000 patients with pelvic cancer.⁵⁷

The most relevant CT findings are cited in Table 1.

Table 1.

Most relevant CT findings according to the type of injury.

	Type	Most Relevant CT Findings
1	Small bowel obstruction	- Different degree of loop dilatation according to the cause (adhesions, cancer) and time of obstruction
		- Collapsed loop distal to the obstruction site
		- Ileus
		- Free air/fluid abdominal cavity or retroperitoneum
2	Large bowel obstruction	- Dilatation of the loops according to the level of obstruction
		- Evidence of cancer
		- Free air/fluid abdominal cavity or retroperitoneum
3	Bowel perforation	- Free air/fluid
3	Bowel perforation	- Ileus
4	Intestinal infarction	- Direct involvement of vascular structures by neoplasm
		- Embolism/thrombosis of the mesenteric vessels
		- Thin/thick bowel walls
		- Free fluid/air
5	Abdominal bleeding	- Tumour rupture
		- Vascular involvement from neoplasm
		- Actively bleeding lesions
		- Bleeding, mixed ascites
6	Urinary obstruction	- Evidence of cancer
6	Urinary obstruction	- Upstream hydroureteronephrosis depending on the site of obstruction
7	Biliary obstruction	- Evidence of cancer
7	Biliary obstruction	- Upstream biliary dilatation
8	Radiation enteritis	- Narrowing of the bowel lumen with adjacent vascular changes at the site of treatment
8	Radiation enteritis	- Dilatation of the bowel proximal to the site of treatment

In conclusion, emergency radiologist may encounter numerous abdominal emergencies in cancer patients and should be cognizant of their unique presentations and available management options.⁶¹

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Mariano Scaglione

Davide Turilli

Michael N Patlas

References

Cao

Alabousi

Farshait

Patlas

. Barriers to screening at-risk populations in Canada. Can Assoc Radiol J 2022;084653712211473. doi:10.1177/08465371221147307

Patlas

Katz

Scaglione

. Atlas of Emergency Imaging from Head-To-Toe. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2022.

Lewis

Hendrickson

Moynihan

. Oncologic emergencies: Pathophysiology, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:287-314.

Jafari

Rezaei-Tavirani

Salimi

Tavakkol

Jafari

. Oncological emergencies from pathophysiology and diagnosis to treatment: A narrative review. Soc Work Publ Health. 2020;35(8):689-709.

Katabathina

Restrepo

Betancourt Cuellar

Riascos

Menias

. Imaging of oncologic emergencies: What every radiologist should know. Radiographics. 2013;33(6):1533.

Scaglione

Iacobellis

Muto

Basilico

. Chemotherapy-induced toxicities and their impact on daily imaging practice: Is this the time to reassess our imaging interpretation? Can Assoc Radiol J. 2023;74(2):239-240.

Reginelli

Sangiovanni

Vacca

, et al. Chemotherapy- induced bowel ischemia: Diagnostic imaging overview. Abdom Radiol. 2022;47(5):1556-1564. doi:10.1007/s00261-021-03024-9. Epub 2021 Apr 3. PMID: 33811514, PMC9038829.

Patil

Larocque

van der Pol

Torres

Raptis

Patlas

. Chemoterapy-induced toxicities: An imaging primer. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2022;74(2):432-445. doi:10.1177/08465371221120263

Francica

Meloni

Riccardi

, et al. Ablation treatment of primary and secondary liver tumours under contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidance in field practice of interventional ultrasound centers. A multicenter study. Eur J Radiol. 2018;105:96-101. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 May 31. PMID: 30017305.

10.

Alabousi

Patlas

Scaglione

Romano

Soto

. Cross-sectional imaging of nontraumatic emergencies of the spleen. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2014;43(5):254-267.

11.

Patlas

Alabousi

Scaglione

Romano

Soto

. Cross-sectional imaging of nontraumatic peritoneal and mesenteric emergencies. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2013;64(2):148-153.

12.

Iacobellis

Perillo

Iadevito

, et al. Imaging of oncologic emergencies. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018;39(2):151-166. doi:10.1053/j.sult.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 15. PMID: 29571552.

13.

Tirumania

Ojilib

Gunabushanamc

Chintapallib

, et al. MDCT of abdominopelvic oncologic emergencies. Cancer Imag. 2013;13(2):238-252. doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0025

14.

Ilgen

Marr

. Cancer emergencies: The acute Abdomen. Emerg Med Clin. 2009;27:381-399.

15.

Swenson

Rose

Ritz

, et al. Recognition and evaluation of oncology related symptoms in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26(1):12-17.

16.

Scott-Conner

Fabrega

. Gastrointestinal problems in the immunocompromised host. A review for surgeons. Surg Endosc. 1996;10(10):959-964.

17.

Cappell

Batke

. Mechanical obstruction of the small bowel and colon. Med Clin. 2008;92(3):viii575-597.

18.

Hirst

Regnard

. Management of intestinal obstruction in malignant disease. Clin Med. 2003;3(4):311-314.

19.

Ripamonti

Bruera

. Palliative management of malignant bowel obstruction. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2002;12(2):135-143.

20.

Krouse

. The international conference on malignant bowel obstruction: A meeting of the minds to advance palliative care research. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2007;34(suppl 1):S1-S6.

21.

Di Mizio

Scaglione

. Small-bowel obstruction CT features with plain film and US correlations. Springer 2007.

22.

Tamburrini

Serra

Lugarà

, et al. Ultrasound signs in the diagnosis and staging of small bowel obstruction. Diagnostics. 2020;10(5):277. doi:10.3390/diagnostics10050277. PMID: 32375244; PMCID: PMC7277998.

23.

Tamburrini

Lugarà

Iaselli

, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Diagnostics. 2019;9(3):88. doi:10.3390/diagnostics9030088. PMID: 31390727. PMCID: PMC6787646.

24.

Mallo

Salem

Lalani

Flum

. Computed tomography diagnosis of ischemia and complete obstruction in small bowel obstruction: A systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:690–694. doi:10.1016/j.gassu.r.2004.10.006

25.

Scaglione

Galluzzo

Santucci

, et al. Small bowel obstruction and intestinal ischemia: emphasizing the role of MDCT in the management decision process. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022;47(5):1541-1555. doi:10.1007/s00261-020-02800-3

26.

Broek

RPG

Krielen

Di Saverio

, et al. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group. World J Emerg Surg 2018 Jun;1913:24. doi:10.1186/s13017-018-0185-2

27.

Somma

Faggian

Serra

, et al. Bowel intussusceptions in adults: The role of imaging. Radiol Med. Radiol. 2015;120(1):105-117.

28.

Rajput

Kapoor

Wright

Friedman

Patlas

Mellnick

. The use of enteric contrast in the emergency setting. Radiol Clin. 2023;61(1):37-51.

29.

Diamond

Lee

LeBedis

. Small bowel obstruction and Ischemia. Radiol Clin. 2019;57:689-703. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2019.02.002

30.

Jaffe

Thompson

. Large-bowel obstruction in the adult: Classic radiographic and CT findings, etiology, and mimics. Radiology. 2015;275(3):651-663. doi:10.1148/radiol.2015140916

31.

Lassandro

Scaglione

Rossi

, et al. Portomesenteric vein gas: Diagnostic and prognostic value. Emerg Radiol. 2002;9:96-99. doi:10.1007/s1014.0-002-0206-y

32.

Mazzei

Guerrini

Lucii

Mazzei

Volterrani

. Bowel obstruction and intestinal Ischemia: Warnings for radiologists. Abdom Radiol 2020;45:887–888. doi:10.1007/s0026.1-019-02252-4

33.

Mazzei

Guerrini

Cioffi Squitieri

, et al. Diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia/infarction in the era of multislice CT. Recenti Prog Med. 2012;103:435-437. doi:10.1701/1166.12884

34.

Gopee-Ramanan

Patlas

Pindiprolu

Katz

. Utility of biphasic multi-detector computed tomography in suspected acute mesenteric ischemia in the emergency department. Emerg Radiol. 2019;26(5):523-529.

35.

Mazzei

Marrelli

, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of mesentery: Diagnostic value in acute mesenteric ischemia. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012;36:1-7. doi:10.1097/rct.0b013e31823b4465

36.

Saba

Berritto

Iacobellis

, et al. Acute arterial mesenteric ischemia and reperfusion: Macroscopic and MRI findings, preliminary report. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(40):6825-6833. doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i40.6825. PMID: 24187457; PMCID: PMC3812481.

37.

Lassandro

Valente

Rea

, et al. Imaging assessment and clinical significance of pneumatosis in adult patients. Radiol Med. 2015;120:96-104. doi:10.1007/s1154.7-014-0461-5

38.

Mazzei

. Acute mesenteric ischemia: guidelines of the world society of emergency surgery: A brief radiological commentary. World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13:34. doi:10.1186/s1301.7-018-0197-y

39.

Mazzei

Guerrini

Cioffi Squitieri

, et al. Non-obstructive mesenteric ischemia after cardiovascular surgery: Not so uncommon. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Off J Assoc Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Asia. 2014;20:253-255. doi:10.5761/atcs.le.12.02154

40.

Mazzei

Volterrani

. Nonocclusive mesenteric ischaemia: Think about it. Radiol Med. 2015;120:85-95. doi:10.1007/s11547-014-0460-6

41.

Lassandro

Mangoni de Santo Stefano

Porto

, et al. Intestinal pneumatosis in adults: Diagnostic and prognostic value. Emerg Radiol. 2010;17:361-365. doi:10.1007/s1014.0-010-0868-9

42.

Reginelli

Genovese

Cappabianca

, et al. Intestinal Ischemia: US-CT findings correlations. Crit Ultrasound J. 2013;5(suppl 1):S7. doi:10.1186/2036-7902-5-s1-s7

43.

Meader

Munis

Silas

. Diagnosis of a gastrointestinal stromal tumour with spontaneous rupture. Cureus. 2023;15(3):e35872. doi:10.7759/cureus.35872. eCollection 2023 Mar. PMID: 37033514.

44.

Ierardi

Urbano

De Marchi

, et al. New advances in lower gastrointestinal bleeding management with embolotherapy. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1061):20150934.

45.

Agarwal

Kumar

Madhusudhan

. Utility of dual energy CT angiography in the evaluation of acute non-variceal gastrointestinal hemorrhage: Comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023;48(6):1880-1890. doi:10.1007/s00261-023-03864-7. Epub 2023 Mar.

46.

Wah

. Pelvi-ureteric dilatation. In: Allan

Baxter

Weston

, eds Clinical Ultrasound. 3rd edition. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier; 2011. [Book chapter].

47.

Hadas-Halpern

Farkas

Patlas

Zaghal

Sabag-Gottschalk

Fisher

. Sonographic diagnosis of ureteral tumours. J Ultrasound Med. 1999;18(9):639-645.

48.

Bosscher

van Leeuwen

Hoekstra

. Surgical emergencies oncology. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014;40(8):1028-1036.

49.

Okpii

Adamu-Biu

Okpii

. Spontaneous renal tract rupture from obstructing vesico-ureteric junction calculus. Clin Case Rep. 2022;10(5):e05820. doi:10.1002/ccr3.5820. eCollection 2022 May. PMID: 3558216.

50.

Kogut

Bastawrous

Padia

, et al. Hepatobiliary oncologic emergencies: Imaging appearances and therapeutic options. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2013;42(3):113-126.

51.

Stacey

Green

. Radiation-induced small bowel disease: Latest developments and clinical guidance. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2014;5(1):15-29.

52.

Kountouras

Zavos

. Recent advances in the management of radiation colitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(48):7289-7301.

53.

Olopade

Norman

Blake

, et al. A modified inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire and the vaizey Incontinence questionnaire are simple ways to identify patients with significant gastrointestinal symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2005;92(9):1663-1670.

54.

Lefevre

Amiot

Joly

Bretagnol

Panis

. Risk of recurrence after surgery for chronic radiation enteritis. Br J Surg. 2011;98(12):1792-1797.

55.

Anwar

Ahmad

Akhtar

Mahmood

. Antioxidant supplementation: A Linchpin in radiation-induced enteritis. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017;16(6):676-691.

56.

Potten

Booth

. The role of radiation-induced and spontaneous apoptosis in the homeostasis of the gastrointestinal epithelium: A brief review. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 1997;118(3):473-478.

57.

MacNaughton

. Review article: New insights into the pathogenesis of radiation-induced intestinal dysfunction. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14(5):523-528.

58.

Sauer

Becker

Hohenberger

, et al. German rectal cancer study group. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(17):1731-1740.

59.

Huang

Guo

Yao

. Surgery for chronic radiation enteritis: outcome and risk factors. J Surg Res. 2016;204(2):335-343.

60.

Pironi

Arends

Bozzetti

, et al. Home artificial nutrition and chronic intestinal failure special interest group of ESPEN. ESPEN guidelines on chronic intestinal failure in adults. Clin Nutr. 2016;35(2):247-307.

61.

Faggian

Berritto

Iacobellis

, et al. Imaging patients with alimentary tract perforation: Literature review. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2016;37(1):66-69. doi:10.1053/j.sult.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 26. PMID: 26827740.

Abdominal Emergencies in Cancer Patients

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Obstruction

Obstruction of the Gastrointestinal Tract

Bowel Perforations

Intestinal Infarctions

Abdominal Bleeding

Urinary Obstruction

Biliary Obstruction

Radiation Enteritis

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

References