LehmanCDAraoRFSpragueBL, et al.National performance benchmarks for modern screening digital mammography: update from the breast cancer surveillance consortium. Radiology. 2017;283(1):49–58.
2.
ColdmanAJMajorDDoyleGP, et al.Organized breast screening programs in Canada: effect of radiologist reading volumes on outcomes. Radiology. 2006;238(3):809–815.
3.
ThébergeIChangSLVandalN, et al.Radiologist interpretive volume and breast cancer screening accuracy in a Canadian organized screening program. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(3).
4.
HofvindSLeeCI. Consensus reads: the more sets of eyes interpreting a mammogram, the better for women. Radiology. 2020;295(1):42–43.
5.
HoffSRMyklebustTÅLeeCIHofvindS. Influence of mammography volume on radiologists’ performance: results from BreastScreen Norway. Radiology. 2019;292(2):289–296.
6.
KanLOlivottoIAWarren BurhenneLJSicklesEAColdmanAJ. Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program. Radiology. 2000;215(2):563–567.
7.
WalkerMJHartmanKMajpruzV, et al.The impact of radiologist screening mammogram reading volume on performance in the Ontario Breast Screening Program. Can Assoc Rad J. 2021. doi:10.1177/08465371211031186.
8.
SumkinJHGanottMAChoughDM, et al.Recall rate reduction with tomosynthesis during baseline screening examinations: an assessment from a prospective trial. Acad Radiol. 2015;22(12):1477–1482.
9.
KlompenhouwerEGWeberRJVoogdAC, et al.Arbitration of discrepant BI-RADS 0 recalls by a third reader at screening mammography lowers recall rate but not the cancer detection rate and sensitivity at blinded and non-blinded double reading. Breast. 2015;24(5):601–607.
10.
MullenLAPanigrahiBHolladaJPanigrahiBFalomoETHarveySC. Strategies for decreasing screening mammography recall rates while maintaining performance metrics. Acad Radiol. 2017;24(12):1556–1560.
11.
AboutalibSSMohamedAABergWAZuleyMLSumkinJHWuS. Deep learning to distinguish recalled but benign mammography images in breast cancer screening. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(23):5902–5909.
