Intimate partner violence (IPV) is considered to be the leading cause of nonfatal injury to women worldwide. Moreover, the need for effective training for health care professionals (HCPs) and protocol for addressing IPV in health care contexts are well-documented. This article addresses key questions that radiologists may have related to supporting patients who have experienced IPV.
Methods:
Peer-reviewed journal articles and other formal reports were located using Google Scholar and PubMed in order to assemble this review.
Conclusions:
Radiologists are well-equipped to help identify possible instances of IPV if they are aware of the injury patterns commonly associated with IPV. Along with other HCPs, radiologists can also advocate for the implementation of protocols that will guide their responses to victims of IPV within their own health care institution.
Bair-MerrittMHLewis-O’ConnorAGoelS, et al.Primary care-based interventions for intimate partner violence: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(2):188–194. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.001
SpragueSGoslingsJCHogentorenCde MillianoSSimunovicNMaddenKBhandariM. Prevalence of intimate partner violence across medical and surgical health care settings: a systematic review. Violence Against Women. 2014;20(1):118–136. doi:10.1177/1077801213520574
8.
The PRAISE investigators. Prevalence of abuse and intimate partner violence surgical evaluation (PRAISE) in orthopaedic fracture clinics: a multinational prevalence study. Lancet. 2013;382(9895):866–876. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61205-2
9.
BhandariMSpragueSDosanjhS, et al.The PRAISE Investigators. The prevalence of intimate partner violence across orthopaedic fracture clinics in Ontario. J Bone Joint Surg. 2011;93(2):132–141. doi:10.2106/JBJS.I.01713
10.
SpangaroJOZwiABPoulosR. The elusive search for definitive evidence on routine screening for intimate partner violence. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2009;10(1):55–68. doi:10.1177/1524838008327261
11.
WaalenJGoodwinMMSpitzAMPetersonRSaltzmanLE. Screening for intimate partner violence by health care providers: barriers and interventions. AM J Prev Med. 2000;19(4):230–237. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00229-4
12.
DeBoerMIKothariRKothariCKoestnerALRohsTJr. What are barriers to nurses screening for intimate partner violence?J Trauma Nurs. 2013;20(3):155–160. doi:10.1097/JTN.0b013e3182a171b1
13.
ElliottLNerneyMJonesTFriedmannPD. Barriers for screening domestic violence. J Gen Inter Med. 2002;17(2):112–116. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10233.x
14.
VonkemanJAtkinsonPRFraserJMcCloskeyR. MP05: Do emergency department staff use a current domestic violence documentation tool or other forms of intimate partner violence documentation in patient records? Can J Emerg Med. 2017;19:S66. doi:10.1017/cem.2017.171
15.
LapidusGBeaulieuMGelvenEShermanKDuncanMBancoL. A statewide survey of domestic violence screening behaviors among pediatricians and family physicians. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(4):332–336. doi:10.1001/archpedi.156.4.332
16.
RodriguezMBauerHMcLoughlinEGrumbachK.Screening and intervention for intimate partner abuse: practice and attitudes of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1999;282(5):468–474. doi:10.1001/jama.282.5.468
17.
ElliotLNerneyMJonesTFriedmannP. Barriers to screening for domestic violence. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(2):112–116. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10233.x
TodahlJWaltersE. Universal screening for intimate partner violence: a systematic review. J Marital Fam Ther. 2011;37(3):355–369. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00179.x
20.
RoelensKVerstraelenHVan EgmondKTemmermanM. A knowledge, attitudes, and practice survey among obstetrician-gynaecologists on intimate partner violence in Flanders, Belgium. BMC Public Health. 2006;6(1):238. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-6-238
21.
SpragueSSwintonMMaddenKSwalehRGoslingsJCPetrisorBBhandariM. Barriers to and facilitators for screening women for intimate partner violence in surgical fracture clinics: a qualitative descriptive approach. BMC Muskuloskelet Disord. 2013;14(1):122. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-14-122
22.
RichterKPSurprenantZJSchmelzleKHMayoMS. Detecting and documenting intimate partner violence: an intake form question is not enough. Violence Against Women. 2003;9(4):458–465. doi:10.1177/107780120225095
23.
GerberMRLeiterKSHermannRCBorDH. How and why community hospital clinicians document a positive screen for intimate partner violence: a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;6(1):48. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-6-48
24.
DavilaYRMendiasEPJuneauC.Under the RADAR: assessing and intervening in for intimate partner violence. J Nurse Pract. 2013;9(9):594–599. doi:10.1016/J.NURPRA.2013.05.022
SpragueSKalotyRMaddenKDosanjhSMathewsDJBhandariM.Perceptions of intimate partner violence: a cross sectional survey of surgical residents and medical students. J Inj Violence Res. 2013;5(1):1–10. doi:10.5249/jivr.v5i1.147
27.
RoccaGJDSpragueSDosanjhSSchemitschEHBhandariM. Orthopaedic surgeons’ knowledge and misconceptions in the identification of intimate partner violence against women. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(4):1074–1080. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2749-x
28.
WattMHBobrowEAMoraccoKE. Providing support to IPV victims in the emergency department: vignette-based interviews with IPV survivors and emergency department nurses. Violence Against Women. 2008;14(6):715–726. doi:10.1177/1077801208317290
29.
BhandariMDosanjhSTornettaP III, et al.Violence against women health research collaborative. J Trauma. 2006;61(6):1473–1479. doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000196419.36019.5a
30.
BholeSBholeAHarmathC. The black and white truth about domestic violence. Emerg Radiol. 2014;21(4):407–412. doi:10.1007/s10140-014-1225-1
31.
WuVHuffHBhandariM. Patterns of physical injury associated with intimate partner violence in women presenting to the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2010;11(2):71–82. doi:10.1177/1524838010367503
HackenbergEAMSallinenVHandolinLKoljonenV. Victims of severe interpersonal violence are left without advocacy intervention in primary care emergency rooms: a prospective observational study. J Interpers Violence. 2019;1–23. doi:10.1177/0886260519837649
35.
The EDUCATE Investigators. Novel education program improves readiness to manage intimate partner violence within the fracture clinic: a pretest-posttest study. Can Med Assoc J Open. 2018;6(4):E628–E636. doi:10.9778/cmajo.20180150
36.
GeorgeEPhillipsCHShahN, et al.Radiological findings in intimate partner violence. Radiology. 2019;291(1):62–69. doi:10.1148/radiol.2019180801
37.
MatooriSKhuranaBBalcomMC, et al.Intimate partner violence crisis in COVID-19 pandemic: how can radiologists make a difference? Eur Radiol. 2020;30:6933–6936. doi:10:1007/S00330-020-07043-w
HambergerLK. Preparing the next generation of physicians: medical-school and residency-based intimate partner violence curriculum and evaluation. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2007;8(2):214–225. doi:10.1177/1524838007301163.
41.
ConnorPNouerSMackeySBanetMTiptonN. Intimate partner violence education for medical students: towards a comprehensive curriculum revision. South Med J. 2012;105(4):211–215. doi:10.1097/smj.0B013E31824F8B01
42.
SpragueSGoslingsJCPetrisorBA, et al.POSITIVE Investigators. Patient opinions for screening for intimate partner violence in a fracture clinic setting: POSITIVE: a multicenter review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(13):E91. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.01326
SpragueSMaddenKDosanjhS, et al.Intimate partner violence and musculoskeletal injury: bridging the knowledge gap in orthopaedic fracture clinics. BMC Muskuloskelet Disord. 2013;14(1):23. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-14-23
45.
DienemannJGlassNHymanR. Survivor preferences for response to IPV disclosure. Clin Nurs Res. 2005;14(3):215–233. doi:10.1177/1054773805275287
46.
LiebschutzJBattagliaTFinleyEAverbuchT. Disclosing intimate partner violence to health care clinicians—what a difference the setting makes: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:229. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-229
47.
MaddenK. The PRAISE-2 Investigators. Prospective evaluation of intimate partner violence in fracture clinics (PRAISE-2): protocol for a multicentre pilot prospective cohort study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018;4:115. doi:10.1186/S40814-018-0301-9
