This article explores the concerning phenomenon of the narrowing effect in public discourse, particularly in the context of healthcare and Medicare. It discusses the challenges posed by this narrowing effect, the impact of cognitive biases, and the ethical dilemmas faced by healthcare providers and organizations when patients take their concerns public. The article also emphasizes the importance of responsible leadership and offers navigation for overcoming the narrowing of public discourse.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HannonM. Public discourse ands its problems. Sage Journals. 2022;22(3). doi:10.1177/1470594X2211005.
2.
SabinJ. Tackling implicit bias in health care. Med. 2022;387:105-107. New England Journal of Medicine. July 14, 2022. doi:10.1056/NEJMp2201180.
3.
RzeszucinP. Overcoming confirmation bias: an obstacle between you and the insight from your data. Forbes Technology Council. January 19, 2022. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil
4.
FraserTAldrichDPanagopoulosCHummelD. The harmful effects of partisan polarization of health. PNAS NEXUS. 2022;1(1). doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac011.
5.
RobersonQPerryJ. Inclusive leadership in thought and action: a thematic analysis. Sage Journals;47(4). doi:10.1177/10596011211013161.
