We discuss action research healthcare as a transformative approach that continuously innovates in healthcare, attending to the “quadruple” aim. This article is shaped around a decade of evidence in Sweden. At the heart of healthcare action research is the endeavour to “learn by doing” with the participation of key stakeholders, including the patient. Experience suggests that an action research approach is particularly relevant when treating patients with chronic diseases and complex care needs. This inclusion is itself a social learning process and is key to realizing the improved outcomes. Insights from objective quantitative studies are balanced with personal and inter-subjective dialogue that aligns different parts of a system in a movement towards improvement. Close-up non-defensive self-inquiry in the company of colleagues, with trust dynamics building over time, may be a key point of leverage for such systemic improvement activities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerwickDNolanTWWhittingtonJ. Triple aim: care, health and cost. Health Aff. 2008;27(3):759–769.
2.
DentM. Remodelling Hospitals and Health Professions in Europe: Medicine, Nursing and the State. 2nd ed. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2003.
3.
StiernstedtGZetterbergDIgmansonA. Effektiv vård (‘Efficient Care’). Governmental report regarding an improved efficiency in Swedish healthcare. Stockholm, Sweden: Official State Reports; 2016.
4.
World Health Organization. World Health Report2000. WHO Library Cataloguing in Publication Data. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000.
5.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Health Data: Statistics and Indicators for 30 Countries. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2007.
GloubermanSMintzbergH. Managing the care of health and the cure of disease—part I: differentiation. Health Care Manage Rev. 2001;26(1):56–69.
8.
NicolaidesAMcCallumD. Inquiry in action for leaders in turbulent times: exploring the connections between transformative learning and adaptive leadership. J Transform Educ. 2013;11(4):246–260.
9.
SengePSmithBKruschwitzNLaurJSchleyS. The Necessary Revolution: How Individuals and Organizations are Working Together to Create a Sustainable World. New York, NY: Doubleday; 2008.
10.
BodenheimerTSinskyC. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(6):573–577.
11.
IsraelBSchulzAJParkerEBeckerAAllenAGuzmanJR. Critical issues in developing and following CBPR principles. In: MinklerMWallersteinN, eds. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
12.
NicolaidisCRaymakerD. Community-based participatory research with communities defined by race, ethnicity and disability: translating theory to practice. In: BradburyH, ed. The Handbook of Action Research. 3rd ed. London, UK & Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication; 2015:167–117.
13.
BradburyH. How to situate and define action research. In: edBradbury H.The Handbook of Action Research. 3rd ed. London, UK & Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication; 2015:13ff.
14.
DochertyPHuzzardTde LeedePTotterdillP. Home and away. Learning in and learning from organization networks in Europe. Innoflex report. Londond, UK: Innoflex; 2003.
15.
LifvergrenSAndinUHuzzardTHellströmA. The path to sustainability in healthcare—Exploring the role of learning microsystems. In: MohrmanSShaniAB, eds. Organizing for Sustainability, Volume 2. 1st ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald; 2012:169–198.
16.
LifvergrenSHuzzardTLifvergrenS. After a decade of action research: impactful systems improvement in Swedish healthcare. In: BradburyH, ed. The Sage Handbook of Action Research. 3rd ed. London, UK: Sage Publishing; 2015: 337–350.
17.
Health Care Management. Integrated Care in West Skaraborg, final report to SALAR (The Swedish Association of Local Counties and Regions). Stockholm, Sweden: SALAR; 2013.
18.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Health Data. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2013.
19.
SCB. Statistiska centralbyrån (‘Statistics Sweden’). Trender och Prognoser 2014 (‘Trends and prognoses’). Stockholm, Sweden: SCB; 2014.
20.
BatePRobertG. Experience-based design and a case study toward more user-centric OD: lessons from the field of experience-based design and a case study. J Appl Behav Sci. 2007;43(41):41–66.
21.
HuzzardTHellströmALifvergrenSConradiN. A physician-led, and learning driven approach to regional development of 23 cancer pathways on Sweden. In: MohrmanSShaniAB, eds. Reconfiguring the Eco-system for Sustainable Healthcare, Volume 4. 1st ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald; 2014:101–132.
22.
GreenhalghTRobertGMacfarlaneFBatePKyriakidouO. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581–629.
23.
BradburyH. Sustainability as collaboration: The SEER case. Organ Dynam. 2010;39(4):335–344.
24.
EkmanMMaina AhlbergBHuzzardTEkE. Innovationer i vårdens vardag (‘Innovations in the Daily Operations of Healthcare’). 1st ed. Lund, Sweden: Studentllitteratur; 2007.
25.
LifvergrenSDochertyPShaniAB. Toward a sustainable healthcare system: Transformation through participation. In: MohrmanSShaniAB, eds. Organizing for Sustainable Effectiveness, Volume 1. Bingley, UK: Emerald; 2011:99–125.
26.
LifvergrenS. Quality Improvement in Healthcare: Experiences From two Longitudinal Case Studies Using an Action Research Approach [doctoral thesis]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Division of Quality Sciences Chalmers University of Technology; 2013.
27.
JamesIBlombergKLiljekvistEKihlgrenA. Working together for a meaningful daily life for older persons: a participatory and appreciative action and reflection project—the lessons we learned. Action Res. 2015;13(4):336–353.
28.
OlssonELauM. When one size does not fit all: using participatory action research to co-create preventive healthcare services. Action Res. 2015;13(1):9–29.
29.
SztompkaP. Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge Cultural Studies. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: U. Cambridge Press; 2000.
30.
LeplegeAGzilFCammelliMLefeveCPachoudPVilleI. Person-centredness: conceptual and historical perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(20/21):1555–1565.
31.
ZandeeD. Appreciative inquiry: research review and notes. AI Pract. 2015;17(1):61–65.
32.
BurnsD. How change happens: the implications of complexity and systems thinking for action research. In: BradburyH, ed. The Handbook of Action Research. 3rd ed. London, UK & Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing; 2015:434.
33.
LichtensteinB. Complex systems and emergence in action research. In: BradburyH, ed. The Handbook of Action Research. 3rd ed. London, UK & Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing; 2015:446.
34.
DurantAFMcDermottSKinneyGTrinerT. Caring science: transforming the ethic of caring-healing practice, environment, and culture within an integrated care delivery system. Perm J. 2015;19(4):136–142.
35.
StecklerNHuntzickerJ. Nurturing creating destruction: bringing management mindsets and influence skillsets to healthcare. In: BradburyH, ed. The Handbook of Action Research. 3rd ed. London, UK & Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing; 2015:724.
