Agents of government have increasingly used networks as policy tools to connect organizations within and/or across public sector jurisdictions. This has been particularly striking in health systems across Canada. Cynics argue they are pseudo-fixes; we take a more optimistic view. We explore the unique features of mandated networks, sharing their limitations and possibilities and providing targeted messages for policy-makers considering using them, ultimately suggesting that they should “be careful what they ask for.”
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PoppJMilwardBMacKeanGCasebeerALindstromR. Inter-Organizational Networks: A Review of the Literature to Inform Practice. Washington, D.C.: IBM Center for the Business of Government; 2014.
2.
PoppJL’HeureuxLDolinskiC. How do you evaluate a network? A Canadian child and youth health network experience. Can J Program Eval. 2005;20(3):123–150.
3.
Southern Alberta Child and Youth Health Network (SACYHN). Child and youth health networks: A national survey. Calgary, AB; 2004.
MalbyBMervynK. Networks: A Briefing Paper for the Health Foundation. Leeds, England: Centre for Innovation in Health Management, University of Leeds; 2012.
9.
VardaDShoupJAMillerS. A systematic review of collaboration and network research in the public affairs literature: implications for public health practice and research. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(3):564–571.
10.
WillisCRileyBTaylorMBestA. Improving the performance of partnerships for preventing chronic disease: identifying and acting on research needs. Healthcare Manage Forum. 2014;27(3):123–127.
11.
Pan-Canadian Public Health Network. July 9, 2012. Available at:http://www.phn-rsp.ca/network-eng.php. Accessed April 9, 2015. Updated August 20, 2015.
12.
The Networks Leadership Summit Series. Networks Leadership Summit VII. If Networks are the answer what is the question: Rethinking networks. Victoria, BC; 2013.
13.
HuxhamCVangenS. Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. New York: Routledge; 2005.
14.
HuxhamC. Pursuing collaborative advantage. J Oper Res Soc. 1993;44(6):599–611.
15.
O’LearyR. From silos to Networks. In: GuyMERubinMM, eds. Public Administration Evolving: From Foundations to the Future. American Society for Public Administration. New York: Routledge; 2015:85–100.
16.
MilwardHB. What healthcare leaders can learn from research on dark networks. Healthcare Manage Forum. 2014;27(3):136–138.
17.
BrysonJMCrosbyBCStoneMM. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Admin Rev. 2006;66(suppl 1):44–55.
18.
O’TooleL. Networks and networking: the public administrative agendas. Public Admin Rev. 2014;75(3):361–371.
19.
HuertaTCasebeerAVanderPlaatM. Using networks to enhance health services delivery: Perspectives, paradoxes, propositions. Healthcare Papers. 2006;7(2):10–26.
20.
ProvanKGLemaireRH. Core concepts and key ideas for understanding public sector organizational networks: Using research to inform scholarship and practice. Public Admin Review, 2012;72(5):638–648.
21.
MissionP. Collaborative Network Capacity. Public Manage Rev. 2015;17(3):380–403.
22.
HillC. Network literature review: Conceptualizing and evaluating networks. Southern Alberta Child and Youth Health Network (SACYHN), Calgary, AB; 2002.
23.
HoberechtSJosephBSpencerJSouthernN. Inter-organizational networks: An emerging paradigm of whole systems change. OD Practitioner. 2011;43(4):23–27.
24.
ProvanKGMilwardHB. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Admin Rev. 2001;61(4):414–423.
25.
AgranoffRMcGuireM. Big questions in public management research. J Public Admin Res Theor. 2001;11(3):295–326.
26.
BrysonJMCrosbyBCStoneMMSaunoi-SandgrenEO. Designing and Managing Cross-Sector Collaboration: A Case Study in Reducing Traffic Congestion. Washington, D.C., WA: IBM Center for The Business of Government; 2009.
27.
KilduffMTsaiW. Social Networks and Organizations. Sage Publications, London, UK; 2003.
28.
UzziB. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Admin Sci Q. 1997;42(1):35–67.
29.
PaquinRLHoward-GrenvilleJ. Blind dates and arranged marriages: Longitudinal processes of network orchestration. Organ Stud. 2013;34(11):1623–1653.
30.
RodríguezCLangleyABélandFDenisJ. Governance, power, and mandated collaboration in an interorganizational network. Admin Soc. 2007;39(2):150–193.
31.
MilwardHBProvanKG. Principles for controlling agents: The political economy of network structure. J Publ Admin Res Theor. 1998;8(2):203–222.
32.
KelmanSHongS. This could be the start of something big: Linking early managerial choices with subsequent organizational performance. J Public Admin Res Theor. 2015;25(1):135–164.
33.
HeffrenWMcDonaldACasebeerAWallstenD. Mandated intersectoral, interdisciplinary collaboration: Opportunity or oxymoron? In: HibbertP, ed. Co-creating Emergent Insight. Glasgow: Graduate School of Business, University of Strathclyde; 2003:221–227.
34.
IsettKRMergelIALeRouxKMischenPARethemeyerRK. Networks in public administration scholarship: Understanding where we are and where we need to go. J Public Admin Res Theor. 2011;21(suppl 1):i157–i173.
35.
GulatiRLavieDMadhavanR. How do networks matter? The performance effects of interorganizational networks. Res Organ Behav. 2011;31(1):207–224.
36.
ProvanKKenisP. Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. J Public Admin Res Theor. 2008;18(2), 229–252.
37.
AnsellCGashA. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Admin Res Theor. 2008;18(4):543–571.
38.
VangenSHuxhamC. The tangled web: unraveling the principle of common goals in collaborations. J Public Admin Res Theor. 2012;22(4):731–760.
39.
Networks Leadership Symposium. If Networks are the Answer, what is the Question: Rethinking Networks. Symposium Proceedings, Victoria, BC. 2013.
40.
CarboniJMilwardHB. Governance, privatization, and systemic risk in the disarticulated state. Public Admin Rev. 2012;72(S1):S36–S44.
41.
ProvanKFishASydowJ. Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. J Manage. 2007;33(3):479–516.
42.
MilwardHBProvanKFishAIsettKHuangK. Governance and collaboration: An evolutionary study of two mental health networks. J Public Admin Res Theor. 2010;20(suppl 1):i125–i141.
43.
KelmanSHongSTurbittI. Are there managerial practices associated with the outcomes of an interagency service delivery collaboration? Evidence from British crime and disorder reduction partnerships. J Public Admin Res Theor. 2013;23(3):591–622.
44.
CristofoliDMaccioLPedrazziL. Structure, mechanisms and managers in successful networks. Public Manage Rev. 2015;17(4):489–516.
45.
MilwardHBProvanKG. A Manager’s Guide to Choosing and Using Collaborative Networks. Washington, D.C., WA: IBM Center for The Business of Government; 2006.
46.
HibbertPHuxhamCRingPS. Managing inter-organizational relations. In: CropperSEbersMHuxhamMCRingPS, eds. The Handbook of Inter-organizational Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:391–416.
47.
RethemeyerRKHatmakerDM. Network management reconsidered: An inquiry into management of network structures in public sector service provision. J Public Admin Res Theor. 2008;18(4):617–646.
48.
KlijnEEdelenbosJSteijnB. Trust in governance networks: Its impacts on outcomes. Admin Soc. 2010;42(2):193–221.
49.
Networks Leadership Summit IV. The power of networks in times of change. Banff, Alberta; 2009.
