This study examined differing perceptions of teachers and parents pertainitig to frequency and importance of social skills and problem behaviors in preschool children. Children considered at-risk for educationally disabling conditions and typical children were investigated. Teacher and parent ratings on the Social Skills Rating System (SSRS, Gresham & Elliott, 1990) and the revised Conners Rating Scales (CRS, Goyette, Conners, & Ulrich, 1978) were obtained from a sample of 95 children. Both parents and teachers of at-risk children identified significantly fewer social skills and more problem behaviors than did parents and teachers of typical children. Teacher ratings of behaviors did not vary across groups and suggested social behaviors related to peer interactions were valued most. Variation occurred across groups for parent ratings of important social skills, with parents of at-risk students rating self-control behaviors most important and parents of typical students stressing compliance behaviors. Findings were discussed with implications forassessment and remediation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achenbach, T., & Edelbrock, C. (1983). Manunl for the child behavior checklist and revised child behavior profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.
2.
Achenbach, T., McConaughy, S., & Howell, C. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications for cross-informant correlations for situational specificity . Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213-232.
3.
Baer, D.M., Wolf, M.M., & Risley, T.R. (1970). The entry into natural communities of reinforcement . In R. Ulrich, T. Stachnik, & J. Mabry (Eds.), Control of human behnaior: Vol. 2: From cure to prevention (pp. 319-324). Glenville, IL: Scott, Foresman.
4.
Brophy, J.E. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51, 5-32.
5.
Bryan, T., & Bryan, J. (1978). Social interactions of learning disabled children . Learning Disability Quarterly, 1, 33-38.
6.
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethodmatrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
7.
Conners, C.K. (1969). A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 884-888.
8.
Conners, C.K. (1970). Symptom patterns in hyperkinetic, neurotic and normal children. Child Development, 41, 667-682.
9.
Conners, C.K. (1973). Rating scales for use in drug studies with children. Psychapharmacology Bulletin, Special Issue, NIMH.
10.
Conners, C.K. (1990). Conners' Rating Scales Manual: Instruments for use with children and adolescents. North Tonawanda, NY : Multi-Health Systems.
11.
Cowen, E., Pedersen, A., Babigian, H., Izzo, L.D., & Trost, M.A. (1973). Long-term follow-up of early detected vulnerable children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41,438-446.
12.
Edelbrock, C., Greenbaum, R., & Conover, N.C. (1985). Reliability and concurrent relations between the teacher version of the Child Behavior Profile and the Conners Revised Teacher Rating Scale. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 295-303.
13.
Eichorn, D.H. (1973). The Berkeley longitudinal studies: Continuities and correlates of behavior. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 5, 297-320.
14.
Elliott, S.N., Barnard, J., & Gresham, F.M. (1989). Preschoolers' social behavior: Teachers' and parents' assessment. journal of Psychoedurational Assessment,7, 223-234.
15.
Elliott, SN, Gresham, F.M., Freeman, T., & McCloskey, G. (1988). Teachers' and observers' ratings of children's social skills: Validation of the Social Skills Rating Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 6,152-161.
16.
Elliott, S.N., & McKinnie, D. (1994). Relationships and differences among social skills, problem behaviors, and academic competence: A study of learning disabled and nondisabled students. Canadian Journal of School Psychlogy , 10, 1-14.
17.
Gerken, K.C. (1979). Assessment of high-risk preschoolers and children and adolescents with low-incident handicapping conditions. In D. Phye & D. J. Reschley (Eds.), School psychology: Perspectives and issues. New York: Academic Press.
18.
Glow, RA, Glow, P.A., & Rump, E.E. (1982). The stability of child behavior disorders: A one year test-retest study of adelaide versions of the Conners Teacher and Parent Rating scales. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10,33-60.
19.
Gordon, E.M., & Thomas, A. (1967). Children's behavioral style and the teacher's appraisal of their intelligence. Journal of School Psychology , 5, 292-300.
20.
Gottlieb, J. (1981). Mainstreaming: Fulfilling the promise. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86,115-126.
21.
Gottlieb, J., Semmel, M.I., & Veldman, D.J. (1978). Correlates of social status among mainstreamed mentally retarded children. Journal of Edurational Psychology , 70, 376-405.
22.
Goyette, C.H., Conners, C.K., & Ulrich, R.F. (1978). Normal data on revised Conners Parent and Teachers Rating Scales. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6,221-236.
23.
Gresham, F.M. (1981). Social skills training with handicapped children: A review. Review of Educational Research, 51,139-176.
24.
Gresham, F.M. (1982). Misguided mainstreaming: The case for social skills training with handicapped children. Exceptional Children, 48, 420-433.
25.
Gresham, F.M. (1986). Strategies for enhancing the social outcomes of mainstreaming: A necessary ingredient for success. In J. Meisel (Ed.), The consequences of mninstreaming handicapped children (pp. 181-192). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
Gresham, F.M., & Elliott, S.N. (1984). Assessment and classification of children's social skills: A review of methods and issues. School Psychology Review, 13, 292-301.
27.
Gresham, F.M., & Elliott S.N. (1988). Teachers' social validity ratings of social skills: Comparisons between mildly handicapped and non-handicapped children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 6,225-234.
28.
Gresham, F.M., & Elliott, S.N. (1990). Social Skills Rating System. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
29.
Gresham, F.M., Elliott, S.N., & Black, F. (1987). Teacher-rated social skills of mainstreamed mildly handicapped and nonhandicapped children. School Psychology Review, 16,78-88.
30.
Gresham, F.M., & Reschly, D.J. (1986). Social skill deficits and low peer acceptance of mainstreamed learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9,23-32.
31.
Gridley, B.E., Miller, G., Barke, C., Fischer, W., & Smith, D. (1990). Construct validity of the D-ABC with an at-risk preschool population. Journal of School Psychology, 28,39-49.
32.
Guralnick, M.J. (1986). The peer relations of young handicapped and nonhandicapped children. In P.S. Strain, M.J. Guralnick, & H.M. Walker (Eds.), Children's social behavior: Development, assessment, and modification (pp. 93-142). Orlando FL: Academic Press.
33.
Kazdirf, A.E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification , 1, 427-451.
34.
Kivlahan, D.R., Siegel, L.J., & Ullman, D.G. (1982). Relationships among measures of activity in children . Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 7,331-334.
35.
Lambert, N. (1976). Children's problems and classroom interventions from the perspective of classroom teachers. Professional Psychology , 7,507-517.
36.
Lazar, I., Hubbell, V., Murray, H., Rosche, M., & Royce, J. (1977). The persistence of preschool effects: A long term follow-up of fourteen infant and preschool experiments. (Grant No. 18-76-07843) . Ithaca, NY: Comell University, Community Service Laboratory.
37.
Minde, K.K. (1980). Some thoughts on the social ecology of present day psychopharmacology. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 25,201-212.
38.
Morrison, G., Fomess, S., & MacMillian, D. (1983). Influences on the sociometric ratings of mildly handicapped children: A path analysis. Journal of Edcuaitonal Psychology, 75, 63-74.
39.
Parker, J.G., & Asher, S.R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin , 102,357-389.
40.
Parker, S., Green, S., & Zuckerman,, P. (1988). Double jeopardy: The impact of poverty on early childhood development. The Pediatric Clirnics of NorthAmerica, 35.
41.
Powless, D.L., & Elliott, SN (1993). Assessment of social skills of Native American preschoolers: Teachers' and parents' ratings. Journal of school Psyehology,31, 293-307.
42.
Reynolds, C.R. (1979). Should we screen preschoolers?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4,175-181.
43.
Roff, M., Sells, S.B., & Golden, M.M. (1972). Social adjustment and personality development in children. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
44.
Sameroff, A.J., & Seifer, R. (1983). Familial risk and child competence. Child Development, 54, 1254-1268.
45.
Stephens, T.M. (1978). Social skills in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Cedars Press.
46.
Strain, P.S., Odom, S., & McConnell, S. (1984). Promoting social reciprocity of exceptional children: Identification, target behavior selections, and intervention. Remedial and Special Education, 5,21-28.
47.
Stumme, V.A., Gresham, F.M., & Scott, N.A. (1982). Validity of social behavior assessment in discriminating emotionally disabled from nonhandicapped students. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 4,327-342.
48.
Tranontana, M.G., Hooper, S.R., & Selzer, S.C. (1988). Research on the preschool prediction of later academic achievement: A review. Developmental Review, 8,89-146.
49.
Ullmann, C.A. (1957). Teachers, peers, and tests as predictors of adjustment . Journal of Educational Psychology, 48,257-267.
50.
Wemer, E.E., & Smith, R.S. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
51.
Winnett, R., & Winkler, R. (1972). Current behavior modification in the classroom: Be still, be quiet, be docile. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5,499-504.
52.
Wolf, M.M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11,203-214.
