The goal of the experiment was to examine the relevance of a new French web-based assessment, Tinfolec (Test INFOrmatisé d’évaluation de la LECture), the aim of which is to evaluate the reading abilities of children in primary grades. The participants were 1,016 children from Grades 2 to 5. They completed the five tasks of Tinfolec designed to assess the efficiency of the two procedures used to identify written words (the nonlexical route and the lexical orthographic route). We tested the reliability and validity of the new tool in a subsection of this sample. Correlational analyses provided evidence of the reliability and validity of Tinfolec. The results are consistent with the conventionally observed effect of lexical factors (length, consistency, and frequency) on written word processing. The results confirm the relevance of the proposed tasks. The study produced promising results and would allow practitioners to perform online assessments of reading skills.
BosseM.-L.ChavesN.LargyP.ValdoisS. (2015). Orthographic learning during reading: The role of whole-word visual processing. Journal of Research in Reading, 38, 141-158.
CastlesA.ColtheartM. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read?Cognition, 91, 77-111.
4.
ColtheartM. (2005). Modeling reading: The dual route approach. In SnowlingN. J.HulmeC. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 6-23). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
5.
ColtheartM.RastleK.PerryC.LangdonR.ZieglerJ. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
6.
CorteseM. J.SimpsonG. B. (2000). Regularity effects in word naming: What are they?Memory & Cognition, 28, 1269-1276.
7.
CostaH. C.PerdryH.SoriaC.PulgarS.CusinF.DellatolasG. (2013). Emergent literacy skills, behavior problems and familial antecedents of reading difficulties: A follow-up study of reading achievement from kindergarten to fifth grade. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 1018-1035.
8.
CunninghamA. E.PerryK. E.StanovichK. E.ShareD. L. (2002). Orthographic learning during reading: Examining the role of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 185-199.
9.
de JongP. F.BitterD. J.van SettenM.MarinusE. (2009). Does phonological recoding occur during silent reading and is it necessary for orthographic learning?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 267-282.
10.
de JongP. F.ShareD. L. (2007). Orthographic learning during oral and silent reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 55-71.
11.
GraingerJ.LétéB.BertrandD.DufauS.ZieglerJ. C. (2012). Evidence for multiple routes in learning to read. Cognition, 123, 280-292.
12.
GraingerJ.ZieglerJ. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 54. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
13.
Jacquier-RouxM.ValdoisS.ZormanM. (2005). ODEDYS: Outil de dépistage des dyslexies [Dyslexia screening test]. Grenoble, France: Laboratoire Cogni-Sciences.
14.
JaredD. (2002). Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 723-750.
15.
KirbyJ. R.ParrillaR. K.PfeifferS. L. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453-464.
16.
KyteC. S.JohnsonC. J. (2006). The role of phonological recoding in orthographic learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 166-185.
17.
LefavraisP. (2005). Alouette-R, Test d’analyse de la lecture et de la dyslexie [Alouette-R, Test of reading skills and dyslexia]. Paris, France: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
18.
LétéB.Sprenger-CharollesL.ColéP. (2004). MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary school readers. Behavior Research Methods, 36, 156-166.
19.
LoganJ. A. R.SchatschneiderC.WagnerR. K. (2011). Rapid serial naming and reading ability: The role of lexical access. Reading and Writing, 24, 1-25.
20.
Maionchi-PinoN.MagnanA.EcalleJ. (2010). The nature of the phonological processing in French dyslexic children: Evidence for the phonological syllable and linguistic features’ role in silent reading and speech discrimination. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 123-150.
21.
MatheyS.RativeauS.JourdainC.ZagarD. (2000). L’évaluation des compétences enlecture des enfants: Utilisation de mesures chronométriques [Assessment of reading skills in children: The use of temporal measurements]. Revue de Psychologie de l’education, 1, 1-117.
22.
Melby-LervågM.LysterS. A. H.HulmeC. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322-352.
23.
MoraisJ. (1994). L’Art de Lire [The art of reading] (Edition de poche: Collection “Opus”). Paris, France: Editions Odile Jacob.
24.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do—Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume I). doi:10.1787/9789264091450
25.
OuelletteG.BeersA. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing, 23, 189-208.
26.
SchatschneiderC.FletcherJ. M.FrancisD. J.CarlsonC. D.FoormanB. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265-282.
27.
ShareD. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218.
28.
SingletonC. H. (2001). Computer-based assessment in education. Educational & Child Psychology, 18, 58-74.
29.
SingletonC. H.HorneJ.SimmonsF. (2009). Computerized screening for dyslexia in adults. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 137-152.
30.
SingletonC. H.HorneJ.VincentD. (1995). Implementation of a computer-based system for the diagnosis assessment of reading (Unpublished Project Report to the National Council for Educational Technology). Hull, UK: Department of Psychology, University of Hull.
31.
Sprenger-CharollesL.ColéP.BechennecD.Kipffer-PiquardA. (2005). French normative data on reading and related skills from EVALEC, a new battery of tests (end Grade 1, Grade 2, Grade 3, Grade 4). European Review of Applied Psychology/Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 55, 157-186.
32.
Van den BosK. P.ZijlstraB. J. H.Lutje SpelbergH. C. (2002). Lifespan data on continuous-naming speeds of numbers, letters, colors, and pictured objects, and word reading speed. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 25-49.
33.
WangS.JiaoH.YoungM. J.BrooksT.OlsonJ. (2008). Computer-based and paper and-pencil testing in K-12 reading assessments. A meta-analysis of testing mode effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 5-24.
34.
WechslerD. (2005). WISC-IV: Echelle d’intelligence de Wechsler pour enfants: Fourth French Edition [Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth French Edition]. Paris, France: Evangelical Christian Publishers Association.
35.
ZieglerJ.BertrandD.LétéB.GraingerJ. (2014). Orthographic and phonological contributions to reading development: Tracking developmental trajectories using masked priming. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1026-1036.
