Although intuitively appealing, teacher self-report of treatment integrity is not currently recommended as a method for collecting treatment integrity data. Education researchers have not, however, evaluated features of a treatment integrity self-reporting system that may facilitate accurate self-report. In this preliminary investigation, four treatment integrity assessment conditions were investigated: (a) weekly verbal self-report, (b) weekly written self-report, (c) daily verbal self-report, and (d) daily written self-report. Results indicated that teachers who reported treatment integrity daily had the highest overall treatment integrity levels, but neither the frequency nor method of treatment integrity assessment significantly influenced the teachers’ level of treatment integrity. However, results suggested that frequency and method of treatment integrity self-report may be related to accuracy of teacher report.
BaborT. F.StephensR. S.MarlattG. A. (1987). Verbal report methods in clinical research on alcoholism: Response bias and its minimization. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 48, 410-424.
2.
BerganJ. R.KratochwillT. R. (1990). Behavioral consultation and therapy. New York, NY: Plenum.
3.
BurtonS.BlairE. (1991). Task conditions, response formulation processes, and response accuracy for behavioral frequency questions in surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 50-79.
4.
ChafouleasS. M.BrieschA. M.Riley-TillmanT. C.McCoachD. B. (2009). Moving beyond assessment of treatment acceptability: An examination of the factor structure of the Usage Rating Profile—Intervention (URP-I). School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 36-47.
5.
CochraneW. S.LauxJ. M. (2008). A survey investigating school psychologists’ measurement of treatment integrity in school-based interventions and their beliefs about its importance. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 499-507.
6.
FabianoG. A.VujnovicR.PelhamW. E.WaschbuschD. A.MassettiG.M.YuJ.VolkerM. (2010). Enhancing the effectiveness of special education programming for children with ADHD using a daily report card. School Psychology Review, 39, 219-239.
7.
GermannJ. N.KirschenbaumD. S.RichB. H. (2007). Child and parental self-monitoring as determinants of success in the treatment of morbid obesity in low-income minority children. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32, 111-121.
8.
JimersonS. R.BurnsM. K.VanDerHeydenA. M. (2007). Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York, NY: Springer.
9.
KazdinA. E. (1980). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 259-273.
10.
KelleherC.Riley-TillmanT. C.PowerT. J. (2008). Partnership-based consultation: Intervention design and its impact on treatment integrity. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 18, 294-324.
11.
KirschenbaumD. S.GermannJ. N.RichB. H. (2005). Treatment of morbid obesity in low-income adolescents: Effects of parental self-monitoring. Obesity Research, 13, 1527-1529.
12.
MartensB. K.WittJ. C.ElliottS. N.DarveauxD. X. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 191-198.
13.
MortensonB. P.WittJ. C. (1998). The use of weekly performance feedback to increase teacher implementation of a prereferral academic intervention. School Psychology Review, 27, 613-627.
14.
NoellG. H. (2010). Empirical and pragmatic issues in assessing and supporting intervention implementation in school. In PeackockG. G.ErvinR. A.DalyE. J.MerrellK. W. (Ed.), Practical handbook in school psychology (pp. 513-530). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
15.
NoellG. H.GansleK. A. (2006). Assuring the form has substance: Treatment plan implementation as the foundation of assessing response to intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 32-39.
16.
NoellG. H.WittJ. C.SliderN. J.ConnellJ. E.GattiS. L.WilliamsK. L.ResetarJ. L. (2005). Treatment implementation following behavioral consultation in schools: A comparison of three follow-up strategies. School Psychology Review, 34, 87-106.
17.
PelhamW. E.FabianoG. A. (2008). Evidence-based psychosocial treatment for ADHD: An update. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37, 184-214.
18.
QuittnerA. L.EspelageD. L.Ievers-LandisC.DrotarD. (2000). Measuring adherence to medical treatments in childhood chronic illness: Considering multiple methods and sources of information. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 7, 41-54.
19.
RiekertK. A. (2006). Integrating regimen adherence assessment into clinical practice. In O’DonohueW. T.LevenskyE. R. (Eds.), Promoting treatment adherence: A practical handbook for health care providers (pp. 17-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
SanettiL. M. H.ChafouleasS. M.ChristT. J.GritterK. L. (2009). Extending DBR use beyond student assessment: Applications to treatment integrity assessment within a multi-tier model of school-based intervention delivery. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 251-258.
21.
SanettiL. M. H.DiGennaro-ReedF. M. (2011). Barriers to implementing treatment integrity procedures in school psychology research: Survey of treatment outcome researchers. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 37(4), 195-202.
22.
SanettiL. M. H.GritterK. L.DobeyL. (2011). Treatment integrity of interventions with children in the school psychology literature from 1995 to 2008. School Psychology Review. School Psychology Review, 40, 72-84.
23.
SanettiL. M. H.KratochwillT. R. (2011). Daily versus weekly teacher self-report of treatment integrity: Impact on implementation and report accuracy. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 21, 284-308.
24.
SanettiL. M. H.KratochwillT. R. (2009). Toward developing a science of treatment integrity: Introduction to a special series. School Psychology Review, 38, 445-459.
25.
ShapiroE. S. (2004). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
26.
SteeleD. J.JacksonT. C.GutmannM. C. (1990). Have you been taking your pills?: The adherence-monitoring sequence in the medical interview. Journal of Family Practice, 30, 294-303.
27.
WickstromK. F.JonesK. M.LaFleurL. H.WittJ. C. (1998). An analysis of treatment integrity in school-based behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 141-154.
28.
WilkinsonL. A. (2006). Monitoring treatment integrity: An alternative to the “consult and hope” strategy in school-based behavioural consultation. School Psychology International, 27, 426-438.
29.
WittJ. C.MartensB. K. (1983). Assessing the acceptability of behavioral interventions used in classrooms. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 510-517.
