This research evaluates an anti-bullying program, Dare to Care: Bully Proofing Your School. Students in Grades 4-6 (N = 197, 77 boys, 120 girls) from four Calgary elementary schools completed the Colorado School Climate Survey (Garrity, Jens, Porter, Sager, & Short-Camilli, 2000) and the Provictim Scale - Short Version (Rigby & Slee, 1991). The first research component was a pretest - 3-month posttest comparison between a school that was about to implement the program and one that was not planning to do so. At pretest, students in the no-program school gave more positive reports on many variables than the school about to implement the program, making the intended across-school statistical comparison unfeasible. Within the 3-month program school, however, the frequency of bullying witnessed by the students significantly decreased, but remained stable in the no-program comparison school. Further, attitudes towards victims significantly worsened in the no-program school, but remained stable in the program school. The second research component compared three schools that had implemented the anti-bullying program for various lengths of time. Students in the schools with the longer program duration reported more positive attitudes towards victims than students in the school with shorter program duration; however, other indicators of program effectiveness were not significantly different. The results raise questions about evaluating anti-bullying programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bentley, K.M., & Li, A. (1995). Bully and victim problems in elementary schools and students' beliefs about aggression. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 11, 153-165.
2.
Beran, T.N., & Tutty, L. (2002). Children's reports of bullying and safety at school . Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 17(2), 1-14.
3.
Bernstein, J., & Watson, M.W. (1997). Children who are targets of bullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 483-498.
4.
Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand-McNally .
5.
Craig, W. & Pepler, D.J. (1995). Peer processes in bullying and victimization: A naturalistic study. Exceptionality Education in Canada, 4, 81-95.
6.
Craig, W.M., Peters, D., & Konarski, R. (1998). Bullying and victimization among Canadian school children. Retrieved June 15, 2002, from http://www.hrdcdrhe.gc.ca/arb/publications/researdi/abw-98-28e.html
7.
Epstein, L., Plog, A.E., & Porter, W. (2000). Bully proofing your school: Results of a four year intervention. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8.
Eslea, M., & Smith, P.K. (1998). The long-term effectiveness of anti-bullying work in primary schools. Educational Research, 40(2), 203-218.
9.
Farrington, D.P. (1993). Understanding and preventing bullying. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice (Vol. 17, pp. 381-458). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Fonzi, A., Genta, M.L., Menesini, E., Bacchini, D., Bonino, S., & Costabile, A. (1999). Italy. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus , R. Catalano, & P. Slee (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. (pp. 140-156). New York: Routledge.
11.
Garrity, C., Jens, K., Porter, W., Sager, N., & Short-Camilli, C. (1997). Bully proofing your school . Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
12.
Garrity, C., Jens, K., Porter, W., Sager, N., & Short-Camilli, C. (2000). Bully proofing your school (2nd ed.). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
13.
Ma, X., & Klinger, D.A. (2000). Hierarchical linear modeling of student and school effects of academic achievement. Canadian Journal of Education , 25(1), 41-55.
14.
O'Connell, P., Sedighdeilami, F., Pepler, D.P., Craig, W., Connolly, J., Atlas, R., et al. (1997). Prevalence of bullying and victimization among Canadian elementary and middle school children. Available from U.S. Department of Education, Educational Resources Center — ED 427 834 PS 026 206.
15.
Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere (Wiley).
16.
Olweus, D. (1989). Prevalence and incidence in the study of antisocial behavior: Definitions and measurement. In M. Klein (Ed.), Cross-national research in self-reported crime and delinquency. Dodrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
17.
Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among school children: Basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention program. In D. Pepler & K. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411-448). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
Olweus, D. (1992). Bullying among school children: Intervention and prevention. In R. DeV.Peters, R. J., McMahon & P. Quinsey (Eds.), Aggression and violence throughout the life span (pp. 100-125). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school. Cambridge : Blackwell.
20.
Olweus, D. (1999). Norway. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus , R. Catalano, & P. Slee (Eds.), The nature of school bullying (pp. 28-49). New York: Routledge.
21.
Olweus, D. (2001). Peer harassment: A critical analysis and some important issues. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and the victimized (pp. 3-20). New York: Guilford.
22.
Ott, L. (1984). An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). Boston, MA : Duxbury.
23.
Pellegrini, A.D., & Bartini, M. (2000). An empirical comparison of methods of sampling aggression and victimization in school settings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 360-366.
24.
Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1995). A peek behind the fence: Naturalistic observations of aggressive children with remote audiovisual recording. Developmental Psychology. 31, 548-553.
25.
Pepler, D., Craig, W.M., Ziegler, S., & Charach, A. (1994). An evaluation of an anti-bullying intervention in Toronto schools. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health , 13, 95-110.
26.
Pikas, A. (1989). A pure concept of mobbing gives the best results for treatment. School Psychology International, 10, 95-104.
27.
Rigby, K., & Slee, P. (1991). Bullying among Australian school children: Reported behavior and attitudes toward victims. Journal of Social Psychology , 131(5), 615-627.
28.
Schuster, B. (1996). Rejection, exclusion, and harassment at work and in schools: An integration of results from research on mobbing, bullying, and peer rejection. European Psychologist, 1, 293-317.
29.
Smith, P.K. (1997). The 'Safer Schools — Safer Cities' bullying project. In D. Tattum & G. Herbert (Eds.), Bullying: Home, school and community (pp. 99-113). London: David Fulton .
30.
Smith, P.K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R., & Slee, P. (1999). The nature of school bullying. New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
Stevens, V., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Van Oost, P. (2000). Bullying in Flemish schools: An evaluation of anti-bullying intervention in primary and secondary schools. British Joumal of Educational Psychology, 20, 195-210.
32.
Tattum, D. (1993). Short, medium and long-term management strategies . In D. Tattum (Ed.), Understanding and managing bullying (pp. 59-75). Oxford: Heinemann.Thurston , W.E., Meadows, L., Tutty, L.M., & Bradshaw , C. (1999). A violence reduction health promotion model. Unpublished report to Prairie Partners Community Foundation.
33.
Tutty, L. (August, 2002). Aggression and school climate in elementary and middle schools: The impact of a peer mediation program. Paper presented at Victimization of Children & Youth: An International Research Conference. Portsmouth, NH.
34.
Tutty, L., & Bradshaw, C. (2002). School-based violence prevention programs: A resource manual to prevent violence against girls and young women. RESOLVE Alberta. Retrieved March 17, 2002, from http://www.ucalgary.ca:/resolve/violenceprevention.html
35.
Ziegler, S., & Pepler, D.J. (1993). Bullying at school: Pervasive and persistent. Orbit, 24, 29-31.
36.
Ziegler, S., & Rosenstein-Manner, M. (1991). Bullying in schools. Toronto, ON: Toronto Board of Education .
