Self-Esteem,Gender-Role Perception,Gender-Role Orientation and Attributional Style as a Function of Academic Competence: Smart Girls are Different,But a Boy is a Boy is a Boy
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2002
Self-Esteem,Gender-Role Perception,Gender-Role Orientation and Attributional Style as a Function of Academic Competence: Smart Girls are Different,But a Boy is a Boy is a Boy
This investigation examined adolescent self-esteem, gender-role perception, gender-role orientation, and attributional style as a function of academic achievement by having 3 groups of 10th-, 11th-, and 12th-grade males and females (n = 540) respond to (a) a self-esteem inventory under 2 sets of instructions, a standard set and a set in which participants responded as they thought a member of the same age and grade but of the opposite gender would respond; and (b) to an attributional style and a gender-role inventory under the standard set of instructions. The results of the self-esteem inventory under standard instructions revealed a significant difference in favor of males. Under opposite-gender instructions, academically below average and average females ascribed significantly higher levels of self-esteem to males. Males at all academic levels ascribed significantly lower levels of self-esteem to females. However, females in the above average academic group constituted an exception in that they attributed significantly lower self-esteem to males. Reported levels of self-esteem, positive attributional style, and androgynous gender-role orientation all significantly increased commensurate with higher academic achievement for both genders.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, L.V., Seligman, M.E.P., & Teasdlae, J.D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology , 87, 49-74.
2.
American Association of University Women. ( 1992). How schools shortchange girls. The AAUW Report. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation and National Education Association.
3.
Armstrong, J. (1985). A national assessment of participation and achievement of women in mathematics. In L. B. InC. Chipman, & D. Wilson (Eds.) (Ed.), Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation (pp. 56-94). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
4.
Bar-Tal D., & Frieze, I. (1977). Achievement motivation for males and females as a determinant of attributions for success and failure. Sex Roles, 3, 301-313.
5.
Bartunek, J.M. (1981). Why did you do that? Attribution theory in organizations . Business Horizons, 24, 582-599.
6.
Bern, S.L. (1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc .
7.
Bern, S.L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354-364.
8.
Bond, L.A., & Deming, S. (1982). Children's causal attributions for performance on sex-stereotypic tasks. Sex Roles, 8, 1197-1208.
9.
Cate, R., & Sugawara, A.I. (1986). Self-role orientation and dimensions of self-esteem among middle adolescents. Sex-Roles , 15, 145-158.
10.
Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: Freeman.
11.
Deax, K., & Farris, E. (1977). Attributing causes for one's own performance: The effects of sex, norms, and outcomes. Journal of Research onPersonality, 59-72.
12.
Donaldson, T.S. (1974). Affective testing in the Alum Rock Voucher schools . New York: Rand.
13.
Fear-Fenn, M., & K., K. (1992). Math + science = vocational preparation for girls: A difficult equation to balance. Unpublished Monograph No. 1, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
14.
Frieze, I. (1973). Cue utilization and attributional judgements for success and failure. Journal of Personality, 39, 590-605.
15.
Hanes, B., Prawatt R., & Grissom S. (1979). Sex-role perceptions during adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 850-855.
16.
Johnson, D.S. (1981). Naturally acquired learned helplessness: The relationship of school failure to achievement behavior, attributions, and self-concept . Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 174-180.
17.
Kanoy, K.W., Wester, J., & Latta, M. (1990). Understanding differences between high- and low-achieving women: Implications for effective placement and teaching. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 133-140.
18.
Karnes, F.A., & Wherry, J.N. (1981). Self-esteem of gifted students as measured by the Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale. Psychological Reports, 49, 903-906.
Kimball, O.M. (1973). Development of norms for the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory: Grades four through eight. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1131-1132.
21.
Kokenes, B. (1974). Grade level differences in factors of self-esteem . Developmental Psychology, 10, 954-958.
22.
Kuhn D., Nash, S.C., & Brucken, L. (1978). Sex role concepts of two- and three-year-olds . Child Development, 49, 445-451.
23.
Lamke, L.K. (1982). The impact of sex-role orientation on self-esteem in early adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1530-1535.
24.
Liu, X., Kaplan, H.B., & Risser, W. (1992). Decomposing the reciprocal relationships between academic achievement and general self-esteem. Youth and Society;24, 123-148.
25.
Mullis, R.L., & McKinley, K. (1989). Gender-role orientation of adolescent females: Effects of self-esteem and locus of control. Journal of Adolescent Research, 4, 505-516.
26.
Peterson, C., Semmel, A., von Baeyer, C., Abramson, L.Y., Metalsky, G.I., & Seligman, M.E.P. (1982). The Attributional Style Questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6, 287-299.
27.
Prather, J. (1971). Why can't women be more like men: A summary of sociopsychological factors hindering women's advancement in the professions . American Behavioral Scientist, 15, 172-182.
28.
Prawatt, R.S. (1976). Mapping the affective domain in young adolescents . Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 566-572.
29.
Prawatt, R.S., Grissom,S., & Parrish, T. (1979). Journal of GeneticPsychology , 11, 854-856.
Rosenkrantz, P.S., Vogel, S.R., Bee, H., Broverman, I.K., & Broverman, D.M. (1968). Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 287-295.
32.
Rust, J.O., & McCraw, A. (1984). adolescence, 19, 359-366.
33.
Ryckman, D.B., & Peckman, P. (1987). Journal of Early Adolescence, 7, 47-63.
34.
Sachs, R., Chrisler, J.C., & Devlin, A.S. (1992). Biographic and personal characteristics of women in management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 41, 89-100.
35.
Scannel, D. (1982). Test for Academic Proficiency. Chicago: Riverside Publishing Company.
36.
Seidner, C.J. (1978). Interaction of sex and locus of control in predicting self-esteem. Psychological Reports, 43, 895-898.
37.
Shaver, K.G. (1975). An introduction to attribution processes. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers, Inc .
38.
Simon, J.G., & Feather, N.T. (1973). Causal attributions for success and failure at university examinations. Journal of Educational Psychology , 64, 45-56.
39.
Walsh,J., & Winne, P.H. (1980). Cognitive-motivational characteristics of children varying in reading ability: Evidence for learned helplessness in poor readers . Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 423-424.
40.
Watkins, D. (1982). Sex role perceptions of Filipino adolescents. International Journal of Psychology17, 359-368.
41.
Whitley, B.E., & Sweeny, P.D. (1981). Sex-role self-concept and attributional style . Unpublished Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Detroit, MI .
