NelsonJL, NelsonHL. Guided by intimates. Hastings Cent Rep1993; 23(5): 14–15.
10.
LongSO. Public passages, personal passages, and reluctant passages: notes on investigating cancer disclosure practices in Japan. J Med Hum2000; 21(1).
11.
ScheffTJ. Negotiating reality: notes on power in the assessment of responsibility. Social Problems1968; 16: 3–17.
12.
FadenRR, BeauchampTL. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
13.
EvansD.An ethical dilemma: the dishonest doctor. Nursing Forum1995; 30(3): 5–11.
14.
FrankG, A discourse of relationships in bioethics: patient autonomy and end-of-life decision making among elderly Korean Americans. Med Anthropol Q1998; 12: 403–423.
15.
MiyajiNT. The power of compassion: truth-telling among American doctors in the care of dying patients. Soc Sci Med1993; 36: 249–264.
16.
Some cultures resent US doctors’ candor.Ann Arbor News, 1 January 1993.
17.
BlackhallL, Ethnicity and attitudes towards patient autonomy. JAMA1995; 274: 820–825.
18.
HahnR.Culture and informed consent: an anthropological perspective. In: President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Making Health Care Decisions: The Ethical and Legal Implications of Informed Consent in the Patient-Practitioner Relationship. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1982.
19.
LearMW. Should doctors tell the truth?The case against terminal candor. New YorkTimes Magazine, 24 January 1993: 17.
20.
StolbergS.Fatalism toward cancer. Los Angeles Times, 26 December 1992: 1.
21.
TanidaN.Japanese attitudes towards truth disclosure in cancer. Scand Soc Med1994; 22: 50–57.
22.
GoffmanE.The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, Kansas: Doubleday, 1959.
23.
LongSO, LongBD. Curable cancers and fatal ulcers: attitudes toward cancer in Japan. Soc Sci Med1982; 16: 2101–2108.
24.
KaiI, Communication between patients and physicians about terminal care. Soc Sci Med1993; 36: 1151–1159.
25.
Ohnuki-TierneyE.Illness and Culture in Contemporary Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
26.
HattoriH, The patient's right to information in Japan. Soc Sci Med1991; 32: 1107–1117.
27.
HiraiwaM.Gan wa hyaku pasento kokuchi koso, risôteki na gan chiryô ga kanô [Ideal cancer treatment becomes a possibility to the extent that cancer is disclosed one hundred percent]. Nihon no Ronten1997. Tokyo: Bungeishunjû, 1996.
28.
IshiwataR, SakaiA.The physician-patient relationship and medical ethics in Japan. Cambridge Q Healthc Ethics1994; 3: 60–66.
29.
KimuraR.Bioethics as a prescription for civic action: the Japanese interpretation. J Med Philoso1987; 12: 267–277.
30.
RyanS.Gendai iryô to infômudo konsento [Modern medicine and informed consent]. Kokoro no Kango [Winter]1997; 22: 6–26.
31.
SasakoM.Gan chiryô ni kansuru rinshô jikken ni okeru infômudo konsento [Getting informed consent in clinical trials on Japanese cancer patients]. Gan To Kagaku Ryôhô [Japanese Journal of Cancer Chemotherapy]1996; 23: 146–150. [English abstract, pp. 149–150.]
32.
TanidaN.Gan kokuchi shinchôron to Nihon shakai no tokuchô, kazoku no hantai. Semina Iryô to Shakai.1994; 6: 3–16.
33.
YamazakiF.Dying in a Japanese Hospital. Yasuko Claremont (translator). Tokyo: The Japan Times, Tokyo; 1996.
MorikawaI.Patients’ rights in Japan: progress and resistance. Kennedy Institute for Ethics Journal1995; 4: 337–343.
36.
OgyûH.Dôi no rinri [The ethics of consent]. Igaku Tetsugaku, Igaku Rinri1995; 13: 132–139.
37.
SugitaI.Infômudo konsento to wa nani ka [What is informed consent?]. Igaku Tetsugaku, Igaku Rinri1995; 13: 88–104.
38.
LeflarRB. Informed consent and patients’ rights in Japan. Houston Law Review1996; 33: 1–112.
39.
HoshinoK.Autonomous decision making and Japanese tradition. Cambridge Q Healthc Ethics1995; 4: 71–74.
40.
AsaiA.Barriers to informed consent in Japan. Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics1996; 6(4): 91–93.
41.
AsaiA.Should physicians tell patients the truth? West J Med1995; 163: 36–39.
42.
HayashiC.Nihonjin no honshin o sagareba hyaku pasento gan kokuchi nado higenjitsuteki [If we look at the true feelings of Japanese, one hundred percent cancer disclosure is unrealistic]. Nihon no Ronten1997. Tokyo: Bungeishunjû; 1996.
43.
SakamotoH.Tôajia seimei rinri gakkai no sôritsu [The establishment of the East Asian Association of Bioethics]. Gakujutsu Geppô1996; 49: 741–745.
44.
HiguchiN.The patient's right to know of a cancer diagnosis: a comparison of Japanese paternalism and American self-determination. Washburn Law Journal1992; 31: 455–473.
45.
SasakiY.Iryô to Keihô [Medicine and Criminal Law]Tokyo: Nanzôsha, 1994; pp. 18–26.
46.
Sôrifu [Office of the Prime Minister]. Seron Chôsa Nenpô [Yearbook of Public Opinion Polls]. Tokyo: Office of the Prime Minister, 1994; pp. 463, 466.
47.
KashiwagiT.Shi o mitoru igaku [Medicine that cares for the dying] NHK Ningen Daigaku [January–March] 1997.
48.
MoriokaY.Infômudo Konsento [Informed Consent]. Tokyo: NHK Books, 1994.
49.
MatsumotoT, NishiwakiY, NagaiK.Monshinhyô ni okeru byômei kokuchi no kibô [Written request for being told a cancer diagnosis]. Paper presented at the meeting of the Japan Society for Bioethics, October 24, 1996.
50.
Kôseishô Kenkô Seisaku Kyoku Sômuka [General Affairs Division, Health Policy Section, Ministry of Health and Welfare]. Makki Iryô o Kangaeru [Consideration of Terminal Medical Care]. Tokyo: Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1994.
51.
Kôseishô [Ministry of Health and Welfare]. Kôsei Hakusho: Kazoku to Shakai Hoshô — Kazoku no Shakaiteki Shien no tame ni [Health and Welfare White Paper: Family and Social Insurance — Toward Support for Social Support of Families]. Tokyo: Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1995.
52.
AsaiA.Kyôdai byôin gairai kanja ishiki chôsa, Shitagaki [Opinion survey of patients at a Kyoto University Hospital clinic]. Unpublished ms., n.d.
53.
ElwynTS, FettersMD, GorenfloDW, TsudaT.Cancer disclosure in Japan: historical comparisons, current practices. Soc Sci Med1998; 46(9): 1151–1163.
54.
SaitoM.Disclosure, decisions, and dementia in Japan: maximizing the continuity of self. In: LongSO (ed). Caring for the Elderly in Japan and the United States: Practices and Policies. London: Routledge, 2000.
55.
FettersMD, DanisM.We live too short, and die too long — On Japanese and US physicians’ caregiving practices and approaches to withholding life-sustaining treatments. In: LongSO (ed). Caring for the Elderly in Japan and the United States: Practices and Policies. London: Routledge, forthcoming.
56.
AsaiA, KishinoM, FukuiT, MasanoT.Post graduate education in medical ethics in Japan. Med Educ1998; 32(1): 100–104.
57.
LongSO. Living poorly or dying well: decisions about life support and treatment termination for American and Japanese patients. Paper presented at the Midwest Japan Seminar/Midwest Conference on Asian Affairs, DeKalb, Illinois, 27 September 1997.
58.
EpsteinAM, Using proxies to evaluate quality of life: can they provide valid information about patients’ health status and satisfaction with medical care? Medical Care1989; 27(3)(suppl.): S91–S98.
59.
HardwigJ.The problem of proxies with interests of their own: toward a better theory of proxy decisions. J Clin Ethics1993; 4: 20–27.
60.
SecklerAB, Substitute judgment: how accurate are proxy predictions? Ann Intern Med1991; 115: 992–998.
61.
TomlinsonT, An empirical study of proxy consent for elderly persons. Gerontologist1990; 30: 54–64.
62.
UhlmanRF, PearlmanRA, CainKC. Physicians’ and spouses’ predictions of elderly patients’ resuscitation preferences. J Gerontology1988; 43: M115–M121.
63.
ZweibelNR, CasselCK. Treatment choices at the end of life: a comparison of decisions by older patients and their physician-selected proxies. Gerontologist1989; 29: 615–621.
64.
Craighill-SaikiS.The children's sentinels: mothers and their relationships with health professionals in the context of Japanese health care. Soc Sci Med1997; 44: 291–300.
65.
LongSO. Nurturing and femininity: the ideal of caregiving in postwar Japan. In: ImamuraA (ed). Re-Imaging Japanese Women. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996; pp. 156–176.