Supportive Palliative Care and Hospice professionals frequently attend to Minimally Conscious State (MCS) patients near the end of life and in so doing, face decisions over maintenance or withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration. Although both withholding and withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) in such circumstances are considered by experts in ethics and law to be acceptable, not all families nor health care professionals agree. This paper will explore basic aspects of serious brain injuries, especially MCS, the psychological role of food in interpersonal relationships, and lessons from clinical ethics that can help in goals of care discussions about withdrawal of ANH.
WijdicksEFCranfordRE. Clinical diagnosis of prolonged states of impaired consciousness in adults. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(8):1037–1046.
2.
SchnakersCVanhaudenhuyseAGiacinoJ, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol. 2009;9:35.
3.
GiacinoJTAshwalSChildsN, et al.The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002;58(3):349–353.
4.
Hodelín-TabladaR. Minimally conscious state: evolution of concept, diagnosis and treatment. MEDICC Rev. 2016;18(4):43–46.
5.
GiacinoJTKatzDISchiffND, et al.Practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Neurology.2018;91(10):450–460.
6.
BolyMFaymonvilleMESchnakersC, et al.Perception of pain in the minimally conscious state with PET activation: an observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(11):1013–1020.
7.
FineRL. From Quinlan to Schiavo: medical, ethical, and legal issues in severe brain injury. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2005;18(4):303–310.
8.
ColbyWH. Nancy Cruzan and the withhold versus withdraw dilemma. Am J Bioeth. 2019;19(3):1–2.
9.
FineRL. The Texas advance directives act of 1999: politics and reality. HEC Forum. 2001;13(1):59–81.
10.
BeauchampTChildressJ. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Eighth Edition. Oxford University Press; 2019.
11.
FleckLM. What is life worth?Virtual Mentor. 2011;13(3):251–255.
12.
LocherJLYoelsWCMaurerDVan EllsJ. Comfort foods: an exploratory journey into the social and emotional significance of food. Food Foodways. 2005;13(4):273–207.
13.
HamburgMEFinkenauerCSchuengelC. Food for love: the role of food offering in the empathic emotion regulation. Front Psychol. 2014;5:32.
14.
EsbensenK. A closer look at health care providers’ moral distress regarding the withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration. AJOB Neuroscience. 2016;7(1):1–4.
15.
IvanovićNBücheDFringerA. Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking at the end of life—“a systematic search and review” giving insight into an option of hastening death in capacitated adults at the end of life. BMC Palliat Care. 2014;13(1):1.
