Potential Measurement Properties of a Questionnaire for Eating-Related Distress Among Advanced Cancer Patients With Cachexia: Preliminary Findings of Reliability and Validity Analysis
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2022
Potential Measurement Properties of a Questionnaire for Eating-Related Distress Among Advanced Cancer Patients With Cachexia: Preliminary Findings of Reliability and Validity Analysis
Background: There are no validated tools for measuring eating-related distress among patients with advanced cancer. Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the potential measurement properties of a questionnaire for eating-related distress. Methods: This is a secondary analysis. We performed an exploratory factor analysis for factorial validity and calculated Cronbach’s α for internal consistency. Patients were classified into the 2 groups categorized using the international cachexia criteria. The total scores of each factor and all items were calculated, and comparisons were performed for known-group validity. We performed statistical correlation analysis for concurrent validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity using Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient. Results: A total of 140 patients responded. Three factors were identified. The values of Cronbach’s α were 0.90, 0.89, and 0.86, respectively. Patients were classified into 2 groups: Non-cachexia/Pre-cachexia (n = 57) and Cachexia/Refractory cachexia (n = 83). Significant differences were observed in the total scores of each factor and all items: (factor 1) 7.5 vs. 11.0, p < 0.001; (factor 2) 8.0 vs. 13.0, p < 0.001; (factor 3) 5.0 vs. 10.0, p < 0.001; (all items) 20.0 vs. 35.0, p < 0.001, respectively. The total scores of each factor and all items significantly correlated with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised and the nutrition impact symptoms: 0.62 (p < 0.001) and 0.63 (p < 0.001), respectively. Scaling success rates were 100% in factor 1, 2, and 3. Conclusion: The questionnaire appears to be useful. Eating-related distress in patients with advanced cancer had 3 factors.
FearonKCStrasserFAnkerSD, et al.Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(5):489–495.
2.
TisdaleMJ. Mechanisms of cancer cachexia. Physiol Rev. 2009;89(2):381–410.
3.
FearonKArendsJBaracosV. Understanding the mechanisms and treatment options in cancer cachexia. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10(2):90–99.
4.
AmanoKMaedaIMoritaT, et al.Clinical implications of C-reactive protein as a prognostic marker in advanced cancer patients in palliative settings. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016;51(5):860–867.
5.
ArendsJBachmannPBaracosV, et al.ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(1):11–48.
6.
AmanoKMaedaIMoritaT, et al.C-reactive protein, symptoms and activity of daily living in patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2017;8(3):457–465.
SadeghiMKeshavarz-FathiMBaracosV, et al.Cancer cachexia: diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018;127:91–104.
9.
McClementSDegnerLHarlosM. Family beliefs regarding the nutritional care of a terminally ill relative: a qualitative study. J Palliat Med. 2003;6(5):737–748.
10.
McClementSEDegnerLFHarlosM. Family responses to declining intake and weight loss in a terminally ill relative. Part 1: fighting back. J Palliat Care. 2004;20(2):93–100.
11.
McClementS. Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome: psychological effect on the patient and family. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2005;32(4):264–268.
12.
StrasserFBinswangerJCemyTKesselringA. Fighting a losing battle: eating related distress of men with advanced cancer and their female partners: a mixed methods study. Palliat Med. 2007;21(2):129–137.
13.
HopkinsonJBOkamotoIAddington-HallJM. What to eat when off treatment and living with involuntary weight loss and cancer: a systematic search and narrative review. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19(1):1–17.
14.
OberholzerRHopkinsonJBBaumannK, et al.Psychosocial effects of cancer cachexia: a systematic literature search and qualitative analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013;46(1):77–95.
15.
HopkinsonJB. Psychosocial impact of cancer cachexia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2014;5(2):89–94.
16.
ReidJ. Psychosocial, educational and communicative interventions for patients with cachexia and their family carers. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2014;8(4):334–338.
17.
CooperCBurdenSTChengHMolassiotisA. Understanding and managing cancer-related weight loss and anorexia: insights from a systematic review of qualitative research. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2015;6(1):99–111.
18.
HopkinsonJB. Food connections: a qualitative exploratory study of weight- and eating-related distress in families affected by advanced cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016;20:87–96.
19.
WheelwrightSDarlingtonASHopkinsonJBFitzsimmonsDJohnsonC. A systematic review and thematic synthesis of quality of life in the informal carers of cancer patients with cachexia. Palliat Med. 2016;30(2):149–160.
20.
AmanoKMaedaIMoritaT, et al.Need for nutritional support, eating-related distress and experience of terminally ill cancer patients: a survey in an inpatient hospice. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2016;6(3):373–376.
21.
AmanoKMaedaIMoritaT, et al.Eating-related distress and need for nutritional support of families of advanced cancer patients: a nationwide survey of bereaved family members. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016;7(5):527–534.
22.
HopkinsonJB. The nourishing role: exploratory qualitative research revealing unmet support needs in family carers of patients with advanced cancer and eating problems. Cancer Nurs. 2018;41(2):131–138.
23.
AmanoKMoritaTMiyamotoJUnoTKatayamaHTataraR. Perception of need for nutritional support in advanced cancer patients with cachexia: a survey in palliative care settings. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(8):2793–2799.
24.
AmanoKMoritaTKoshimotoSUnoTKatayamaHTataraR. Eating-related distress in advanced cancer patients with cachexia and family members: a survey in palliative and supportive care settings. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(8):2869–2876.
25.
KoshimotoSArimotoMSaitouK, et al.Need and demand for nutritional counselling and their association with quality of life, nutritional status and eating-related distress among patients with cancer receiving outpatient chemotherapy: a cross-sectional study. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(9):3385–3394.
26.
AmanoKBaracosVHopkinsonJ. Integration of palliative, supportive, and nutritional care to alleviate eating-related distress among advanced cancer patients with cachexia and their family members. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019;143:117–123.
27.
BrueraEKuehnNMillerMJSelmserPMacmillanK. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. 1991;7(2):6–9.
28.
BauerJCapraSFergusonM. Use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56(8):779–785.
29.
GelhornHLGriesKSSpeckRM, et al.Comprehensive validation of the functional assessment of anorexia/cachexia therapy (FAACT) anorexia/cachexia subscale (A/CS) in lung cancer patients with involuntary weight loss. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(6):1641–1653.
30.
WheelwrightSJHopkinsonJBDarlingtonAS, et al.Development of the EORTC QLQ-CAX24, a questionnaire for cancer patients with cachexia. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;53(2):232–242.
