Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec.Politique en soins palliatifs de fin de vie.Quebec: author; 2010.
2.
World Health Organization (WHO).WHO definition of palliative care.Geneva: author; 2012.
3.
CrawfordG.B., PriceS.D.Team working: palliative care as a model of interdisciplinary practice.Med J Aust2003; 179(6 Suppl): S32–S34.
4.
McCallinA.Interdisciplinary practice — a matter of teamwork: an integrated literature review.J Clin Nurs2001; 10(4): 419–428.
5.
National End of Life Care Programme, National Health Service.Optimising the role and value of the interdisciplinary team: providing person-centred end of life care.Leeds (UK): author; 2013. Accessed February 15, 2014. http://capcsd.org/interpro-fessional/EoLC.pdf
6.
MoulinP., FravalJ.Interdisciplinarité: regard croisé sur deux cultures de services hospitaliers.Rech Soins Infirm2004; (79): 19–30.
7.
Wittenberg-LylesE.M., OliverD.P., DemirisG.Assessing the nature and process of hospice interdisciplinary team meetings.J Hosp Palliat Nurs2007; 9(1): 17–21.
8.
Les équipes interdisciplinaires en oncologie, Comité des équipes interdisciplinaires de lutte contre le cancer.Direction de la lute contre le cancer.Quebec: Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec; 2005 Aug. Accessed February 15, 2014. http://www.ferasi.umontreal.ca/fra/05_etudi-ants/doc_2002/MSSS%20tremblay.pdf
9.
O'ConnorM., FisherC., GuilfoyleA.Interdisciplinary teams in palliative care: a critical reflection.Int J Palliat Nurs2006; 12(3): 132–137.
10.
GoldsmithJ., Wittenberg-LylesE., RodriguezD.Interdisciplinary geriatric and palliative care team narratives: collaboration practices and barriers.Qual Health Res2010; 20(1): 93–104.
National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care.Clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care.2nd ed.Pittsburgh: author; 2009. Accessed February 15, 2014. http://www.nationalconsensusproject.org/guideline.pdf
RadbruchL., PayneS.White Paper on standards and norms for hospice and palliative care in Europe: part 1.Eur J Palliat Care2009; 16(6): 278–89.
16.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence.Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer.London: author; 2004.
17.
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.Guidelines for a palliative approach for aged care in the community setting: best practice guidelines for the Australian context.Canberra: author; 2011.
18.
FranckeA.L.Evaluative research on palliative support teams: a literature review.Patient Educ Couns2000; 41(1): 83–91.
19.
HardingR., KarusD., EasterbrookP.Does palliative care improve outcomes for patients with HIV/AIDS? A systematic review of the evidence.Sex Transm Infect2005; 81(1): 5–14.
20.
HigginsonI.J., FinlayI., GoodwinD.M.Do hospital-based palliative teams improve care for patients or families at the end of life?J Pain Symptom Manage2002; 23(2): 96–106.
21.
HigginsonI.J., FinlayI.G., GoodwinD.M.Is there evidence that palliative care teams alter end-of-life experiences of patients and their caregivers?J Pain Symptom Manage2003; 25(2): 150–168.
22.
HigginsonI.J., EvansC.J.What is the evidence that palliative care teams improve outcomes for cancer patients and their families?Cancer J2010; 16(5): 423–435.
23.
LorenzK.A., LynnJ., DyS.M.Clinical guidelines. Evidence for improving palliative care at the end of life: a systematic review.Ann Intern Med2008; 148(2): 147–159.
24.
ZimmermannC., RiechelmannR., KrzyzanowskaM.Effectiveness of specialized palliative care: a systematic review.JAMA2008; 299(14): 1698–1709.
25.
LiberatiA., AltmanD.G., TetzlaffJ.The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.Ann Intern Med2009; 151(4): W65–W94.
26.
MoherD., LiberatiA., TetzlaffJ.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.Int J Surg2010; 8(5): 336–341.
27.
ButtersE.H., HigginsonI.Two HIV/AIDS community support teams: patient characteristics, problems at referral and during the last 6 weeks of life.AIDS Care1995; 7(5): 593–603.
28.
ØvretveitJ.Five ways to describe a multidisciplinary team.J Interprof Care1996; 10(2): 163–171.
29.
BrumleyR.D., EnguidanosS., CherinD.A.Effectiveness of a home-based palliative care program for end-of-life.J Palliat Med2003; 6(5): 715–724.
30.
CieminsE.L., BlumL., NunleyM.The economic and clinical impact of an inpatient palliative care consultation service: a multifaceted approach.J Palliat Med2007; 10(6): 1347–1355.
31.
HigginsJ.P.T., AltmanD.G., SterneJ.A.C. In: HigginsJ.P.T., GreenS., editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0. London: Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Chapter 8, Assessing risk of bias in included studies.
32.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), University of York.Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care.York (UK): University of York; 2009 Jan. Accessed February 15, 2014. http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/pdf/Systematic_Reviews.pdf
33.
National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools.Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies.Hamilton (ON): author; 2008.
34.
Armijo-OlivoS., StilesC.R., HagenN.A.Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research.J Eval Clin Pract2012; 18(1): 12–18.
35.
ThomasB.H., CiliskaD., DobbinsM.A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions.Worldviews Evid Based Nurs2004; 1(3): 176–184.
HigginsJ.P., AltmanD.G., GøtzscheP.C.The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.BMJ2011; 343: d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
38.
PetticrewM., RobertsH.Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide.Chichester (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; 2005.
39.
BrumleyR., EnguidanosS., JamisonP.Increased satisfaction with care and lower costs: results of a randomized trial of in-home palliative care.J Am Geriatr Soc2007; 55(7): 993–1000.
40.
GadeG., VenohrI., ConnerD.Impact of an inpatient palliative care team: a randomized control trial.J Palliat Med2008; 11(2): 180–190.
41.
EnguidanosS.M., CherinD., BrumleyR.Home-based palliative care study: site of death, and costs of medical care for patients with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer.J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care2005; 1(3): 37–56.
42.
ChengS.Y., DyS., FangP.H.Evaluation of inpatient multi-disciplinary palliative care unit on terminally ill cancer patients from providers’ perspectives: a propensity score analysis.Jpn J Clin Oncol2013; 43(2): 161–169.
43.
EastaughA.N.Approaches to palliative care by primary health care teams: a survey.J Palliat Care1996; 12(4): 47–50.
44.
CarusoB.The Garfield Memorial Fund: helping KP clinicians and researchers come through the front door with their ideas.Perm J2006; 10(2): 67–69.
45.
OandasanI., BakerG.R., BarkerK.Teamwork in healthcare: promoting effective teamwork in healthcare in Canada.Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2006.
46.
BalshemH., HelfandM., SchunemannH.J.GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.J Clin Epidemiol2011; 64(4): 401–406.
47.
GuyattG., GuttermanD., BaumannM.H.Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an American College of Chest Physicians task force.Chest2006; 129(1): 174–181.
48.
GomesB., HigginsonI.J.Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill patients with cancer: systematic review.BMJ2006; 332(7540): 515–521.
49.
MundayD., PetrovaM., DaleJ.Exploring preferences for place of death with terminally ill patients: qualitative study of experiences of general practitioners and community nurses in England.BMJ2009; 339: b2391. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2391.
50.
ShucksmithJ., CarlebachS., WhittakerV.Dying: discussing and planning for end of life. British Social Attitudes 30.London: NatCen Social Research; 2013.
51.
CritchleyP., JadadA.R., TaniguchiA.Are some palliative care delivery systems more effective and efficient than others? A systematic review of comparative studies.J Palliat Care1999; 15(4): 40–47.
52.
CherinD., EnguidanosS., BrumleyR.Reflection in action in caring for the dying: applying organizational learning theory to improve communications in terminal care.Home Health Care Serv Q2001; 19(4): 65–78.
53.
BrumleyR.D., EnguidanosS., HillaryK.The palliative care program.Perm J2003; 7(2): 7–12.
54.
KruseR.L., Parker OliverD., Wittenberg-LylesE.Conducting the ACTIVE randomized trial in hospice care: keys to success.Clin Trials2013; 10(1): 160–169.
55.
SimonS., HigginsonI.J.Evaluation of hospital palliative care teams: strengths and weaknesses of the before-after study design and strategies to improve it.Palliat Med2009; 23(1): 23–28.
56.
McQuayH., MooreA.Need for rigorous assessment of palliative care.BMJ1994; 309(6965): 1315–1316.