Purpose: To analyze, from the parents’ point of view, the effects of respite services offered at a children's hospice, the Maison André-Gratton. Method: Qualitative methodology (participatory approach) using mainly semi-structured interviews with parents (25 mothers and 8 fathers). Thematic analysis of the data was done. Findings: Respite stays allow parents to get some rest, to feel liberated from the responsibility of taking care of their sick child for a few days, to focus on their other children and their life as a couple, and to break their social isolation. For siblings, the main benefits are having their parents to themselves and sharing activities with them. Conclusion: Two characteristics of the respite program contribute to the positive effects of respite on families — the high quality of the care offered by a qualified staff, and the adequate length of respite stays.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MongeauS., CarignanP., ChampagneM.Au-delà du répit et des activités…un message de solidarité — évaluation du programme Répit à domicile, Le Phare, Enfants et Familles, Phase II.Montreal: Université du Québec à Montréal/Le Phare, Enfants et Familles; 2004.
2.
Le Phare, Enfants, et FamillesPhilosophie et valeurs des employés et des bénévoles.Montreal: author; 2011.
3.
EatonN.“I don't know how we coped before”: a study of respite care for children in the home and hospice.J Clin Nurs2008; 17(23): 3196–3204.
4.
SteeleR., DermanS., CadellS.Families’ transition to a Canadian paediatric hospice. Part two: results of a pilot study.Int J Palliat Nurs2008; 14(6): 287–295.
5.
DaviesB., SteeleR., CollinsJ.B.The impact on families of respite care in a children's hospice program.J Palliat Care2004; 20(4): 277–286.
6.
HorsburghM., TrenholmeA., HuckleT.Paediatric respite care: a literature review from New Zealand.Palliat Med2002; 16(2): 99–105.
7.
MongeauS., LaurendeauM.C., CarignanP.Un soutien qui fait une différence — évaluation de la phase pilote du programme Répit à domicile.Montreal: Le Phare, Enfants et Familles/Université du Québec à Montréal/Régie régionale de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal-Centre; 2001.
8.
Groupe de travail sur les normes en matière de soins palliatifs pédiatriques.Normes en matière de soins palliatifs pédiatriques.Quebec: Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux; 2006.
9.
ThurgateC.Respite for children with complex health needs: issues from the literature.Paediatr Nurs2005; 17(3): 14–18.
10.
DamianiG., RosenbaumP., SwintonM.Frequency and determinants of formal respite service use among caregivers of children with cerebral palsy in Ontario.Child Care Health Dev2004; 30(1): 77–86.
11.
KirkS., GlendinningC.Developing services to support parents caring for a technology-dependent child at home.Child Care Health Dev2004; 30(3): 209–218.
12.
MillerS.Respite care for children who have complex healthcare needs.Paediatr Nurs2002; 14(5): 33–37.
13.
WatsonD., TownsleyR., AbbottD.Exploring multi-agency working in services to disabled children with complex healthcare needs and their families.J Clin Nurs2002; 11(3): 367–375.
14.
PollockN., LawM., KingS.Respite services: a critical review of the literature.Hamilton (ON): CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research; 2001.
15.
Steering Committee of the EAPC task force on palliative care for children and adolescents.IMPaCCT: standards for paediatric palliative care in Europe.Eur J Palliat Care2007; 14(3): 109–114.
16.
Association for Children with Life-threatening or Terminal Conditions and Their Families (ACT), Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH).A guide to the development of children's palliative care services.2nd ed.Bristol (UK): ACT; 2003.
17.
MaynardL., RennieT., ShirtliffeJ.Seeking and using families’ views to shape children's hospice services.Int J Palliat Nurs2005; 11(12): 624–630.
18.
RobinsonC., JacksonP., TownsleyR.Short breaks for families caring for a disabled child with complex health needs.Child Family Soc Work2001; 6(1): 67–75.
19.
SteinA., WoolleyH.An evaluation of hospice care for children. In: BaumJ.D., DominicaF., WoodwardR.N., editors. Listen. My child has a lot of living to do: the partnership between parents and professionals in caring for children with life-threatening conditions.Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1990.
PattonM.Q.Qualitative research and evaluation methods.Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2002.
22.
Savoie-ZajcL.L'entrevue semi-dirigée. In: GauthierB., editor. Recherche sociale.4th ed.Sainte Foy (QC): Presses de l'Université du Québec; 2003.
23.
PailléP., MucchielliA.L'analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales.Paris: Armand Colin; 2003.
24.
SkilbeckJ.K., PayneS.A., IngletonM.C.An exploration of family carers’ experience of respite services in one specialist palliative care unit.Palliat Med2005; 19(8): 610–618.
25.
McConkeyR., TruesdaleM., ConliffeC.The features of short-break residential services valued by families who have children with multiple disabilities.J Soc Work2004; 4(1): 61–75.
26.
JacksonP., RobinsonC.E.Children's hospices: where do they fit?Crit Soc Pol2003; 23(1): 103–112.
