Much concern has centred on the “good” death since the modern hospice/palliative care movement began, and considerable progress has been made in urban services to promote the good death. Little is known about the perspectives of people who live in rural and remote areas of Canada on the good death and how this good death might be enabled in those areas. This report is of an ethnographic study in rural Alberta involving English-speaking Albertans. An identical study in Quebec will be reported elsewhere. The 2006–07 Alberta study involved 13 interviews with individuals to understand their personal viewpoints or perspectives and how they were shaped by their experiences, followed by focus group discussions in two representative rural communities for additional insights from rural policy-makers and care providers. Four themes in the Alberta data highlight critical elements of the good rural death. These findings are expected to contribute to rural/remote palliative and end-of-life care developments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ProulxK., JacelonC.Dying with dignity: the good patient versus the good death.Am J Hosp Palliat Care2004; 21(2): 116–120.
PongR.W.Rural health research in Canada: at the crossroads.Aust J Rural Health2000; 8: 261–265.
4.
Government of Canada.Canadian rural partnership research and analysis: Canadian rural population trends.Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2002. Available from: http://www.rural.gc.ca/research/note/note1_e.phtml
5.
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI).How healthy are rural Canadians? An analysis of their health status and health determinants.Ottawa: CIHI; 2006.
6.
GermainC.P.Ethnography: the method. In: MunhallP.L., editor. Nursing research: a qualitative perspective.Sudbury, MA: Jones Bartlett; 2001. p. 277–306.
7.
LeiningerM.L.Nature, rationale and importance of qualitative research methods in nursing. In: LeiningerML, editor. Qualitative research methods in nursing.Columbus, OH: Greydon; 1998. p. 1–25.
RoperJ.M., ShapiraJ.Ethnography in nursing research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2000.
10.
SpezialeH.S.Ethnography as method. In: SpezialeH.S., Rinaldi CarpenterD., editors. Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative.3rd ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2003. p. 153–180.
11.
VoltzR., AkabayashiA., ReeseC., OhiG., SassH.M.End-of-life decisions and advance directives in palliative care: a cross-cultural survey of patients and health-care professionals.J Pain Symptom Manage1998; 16(3): 153–162.
12.
ThomasR., WilsonD.M., JusticeC., BirchS., ShepsS.A literature review of preferences for end-of-life care in developed countries by individuals with different affiliations and ethnicity.J Hosp Palliat Nurs2008; 10(3): 142–163.
13.
DoorenbosA.Z., NiesM.A.The use of advance directives in a population of Asian Indian Hindus.J Transcul Nurs2003; 14(1): 17–24.
14.
McGrathP., VunM., McLeodL.Needs and experiences of non-English-speaking hospice patients and families in an English-speaking country.Am J Hosp Palliat Care2001; 18(5): 305–312.
15.
KouchM.Managing symptoms for a “good death.”Nursing2006; 36(11): 58–64.
16.
KehlK.A.Moving toward peace: an analysis of the concept of a good death.Am J Hosp Palliat Care2006; 23(4): 277–286.
17.
EngelbergR.A.Measuring the quality of dying and death: methodological considerations and recent findings.Curr Opin Crit Care2006; 12(5): 381–387.
18.
HattoriK., McCubbinM.A., IshidaD.N.Concept analysis of good death in the Japanese community.J Nurs Scholarsh2006; 38(2): 165–168.
19.
ChanT.H., ChanF.M., FayeM.Y., TinA.G., ChowY.M., ChanC.L.W.Death preparation and anxiety: A survey in Hong Kong.Omega - J Death & Dying 2006–2007; 54(1): 67–78.
20.
GoldsteinM., HoutepenR., ProotI.M., Abu-SaadH.H., SpreeuwenbergC., WiddershovenG.What is a good death? Terminally ill patients dealing with normative expectations around death and dying.Patient Educ Couns2006; 64(1-3): 378–386.
21.
EasomL.R., GalatasS., WardaM.End-of-life care: an educational intervention for rural nurses in southeastern USA.Int J Palliat Nurs2006; 12(11): 526–534.
22.
JusticeC.Dying the good death: the pilgrimage to die in India's holy city.Albany: State University of New York Press; 1997.
23.
RietjensJ.A., Van der HeideA., Onwuteaka-PhilipsenB.D., Van der MaasP.J., Van der WalG.Preferences of the Dutch general public for a good death and associations with attitudes towards end-of-life decision-making.Palliat Med2006; 20(7): 685–692.
24.
ConstantiniM., BalziD., GarronecE., OrlandiniC., ParodiS., VercelliM.Geographical variations of place of death among Italian communities suggest an inappropriate hospital use in the terminal phase of cancer disease.Public Health2000 Jan; 114(1): 15–20.
25.
HerdE.B.Terminal care in a semi-rural area.Br J Gen Pract1990; 40(335): 248–251.
26.
GottM., SeymourJ., BellamyG., ClarkD., AhmedzaiS.Older people's views about home as a place of care at the end of life.Palliat Med2004; 18(5): 450–467.
27.
FloryJ., Young-XuY., GurolI., LevinskyN., AshA., EmanuelE.Place of death: U.S. trends since 1980.Health Aff2004; 23(3): 194–200.
28.
KelleyM.L., SellickS., LinkewichB.Rural nonphysician providers’ perspectives on palliative care services in northwestern Ontario, Canada.J Rural Health2003; 19(1): 55–62.
29.
McConigleyR., KristjansonL., NikolettiS.Palliative care in western Australia: an assessment of information and support needs.Int J Palliat Nurs2001; 7(11): 555–564.
30.
HuW.Y., ChiuT.Y., DaiY.T., ChangM., JaingT., ChenC.H.Nurses’ willingness and the predictors of willingness to provide palliative care in rural communities of Taiwan.J Pain Symptom Manag2003; 26(2): 760–768.
31.
MacLeanM.J., KelleyM.L.Palliative care in rural Canada.Rural Soc Work2001; 6(3): 63–73.
32.
TrollorJ.Rural general practitioners and palliative care in the north-west of New South Wales.Aust Fam Physician1995; 24(6): 1106–1109.
33.
WilkesL.M., BealeB.Palliative care at home: stress for nurses in urban and rural New South Wales, Australia.Int J Nurs Pract2001; 7(5): 306–313.
34.
AngrosinoM.V.Recontextualizing observation: ethnography, pedagogy, and the prospects for a progressive political agenda. In: DenzinN.K., LincolnY.S., editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research.3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2005. p. 729–746.
35.
LoiselleC.G., Profetto-McGrathJ., PolitD.F., BeckC.T.Canadian essentials of nursing research.Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2004.
36.
HolmesD.R., MarcusG.E.Refunctioning ethnography: the challenge of an anthropology of the contemporary. In: DenzinN.K., LincolnY.S., editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research.3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2005. p. 1099–1114.
37.
WilliamsA.M., CutchinM.P.The rural context of health care provision.J Interprof Care2002; 16(2): 107–115.
38.
EmersonR.M., FretzR.I., ShawL.L.Writing ethnographic field-notes.Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1995.
39.
FinlayL., GoughB., editors. Reflexivity: a practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences.Oxford: Blackwell Sciences; 2003.
40.
LipsonJ.G.The use of self in ethnographic research. In: MorseJM, editor. Qualitative nursing research: a contemporary dialogue. Rev. ed.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1991. p. 73–89.
41.
RubinH.J., RubinI.S.Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data.2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2005.
42.
LowesL., ProwseM.A.Standing outside the interview process? The illusion of objectivity in phenomenological data generation.Int J Nurs Stud2001; 38: 471–480.
