To identify factors associated with caregiver burden among those caring for terminally ill patients with cancer.
Design
Cross-sectional study of interviews with primary caregivers (n=206) of consecutive patients with cancer enrolled in the largest hospice in Connecticut.
Methods
Data were collected on the caregivers’ sociodemographic characteristics, social network index, and number of restrictions in their own activities due to their caregiving role. The outcome was a nine-item questionnaire adapted from the Zarit Burden Inventory.
Results
The highest burden was reported among caregivers with more limited social networks (OR 1.38, CI 1.02–1.87), more restrictions in their daily activities (OR 1.35, CI 1.13–1.61), and who were younger (OR 1.46, CI 1.10–1.93).
Conclusions
Variations exist in the intensity of caregiver burden based on subjective experiences and social support, rather than on the amount of assistance provided. Clinicians should consider factors such as these when targeting caregivers for interventions to alleviate burden.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics.Older Americans 2000: key indicators of well-being.Hyattsville, Maryland: Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. Available at: <http://www.aginstats.gov/chartbook2000/OlderAmericans2000.pdf> Accessed November 29, 2003.
2.
Spiritual Beliefs and the Dying Process: a report on a national survey.New York: The Nathan Cummings Foundation, 1997.
3.
CovinskyK.E., GoldmanL., CookE.F., OyeR., DesbiensN., RedingD.The impact of serious illness on patients’ families. JAMA1994; 272(23): 1839–1844.
4.
DonnelanK., HillC., HoffmanC., ScolesK., FeldmanP.H., LevineC., GouldD.Challenged to care: informal caregivers in a changing health system. Health Aff2002; 21(4): 222–231.
5.
ArnoP., LevineC., MemmottM.The economic value of informal caregiving. Health Aff1999; 18(2): 182–188.
6.
ConnellC.M., GibsonG.D.Racial, ethnic, and cultural differences in dementia caregiving: review and analysis. Gerontologist1997; 37(3): 355–364.
7.
BeachS.R., SchulzR., YeeJ.L., JacksonS.Negative and positive health effects of caring for a disabled spouse: longitudinal findings from the Caregiver Health Effects Study. Psychol Aging2000; 15(2): 259–271.
8.
SchulzR., NewsomJ., MittelmarkM., BurtonL., HirschC., JacksonS.Health effects of caregiving: the caregiver health effects study: an ancillary study of the Cardiovascular Health Study. Ann Behav Med1997; 19(2): 110–116.
9.
SchulzR., BeachS.R.Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA1999; 282(23): 2215–2219.
10.
PruchnoR.A., ReschN.L.Husbands and wives as caregivers: antecedents of depression and burden. Gerontologist1989; 29(2): 159–165.
11.
ZaritS.H., ReeverK.E., Bach-PetersonJ.Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist1980; 20(6): 649–655.
12.
KatzS., DownsT., CashH., GrotzR.Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist1970; 10(1): 20–30.
13.
LawtonM., BrodyE.Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist1969; 9(3): 179–186.
14.
BerkmanL.F., SymeS.L.Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol1979; 109(2): 186–204.
15.
BedardM.The Zarit Burden Interview: a new short version and screening version. Gerontologist2001; 41(5): 652–657.
16.
BeeryL.C., PrigersonH.G., BierhalsA.J., SantucciL.M., NewsomJ.T., MaciejewskiP.K.Traumatic grief, depression, and caregiving in elderly spouses of the terminally ill. Omega1997; 35(3): 261–279.
17.
HebertR.Reliability, validity and reference values of the Zarit Burden Inventory for assessing informal caregivers of community-dwelling older persons with dementia. Can J Aging2002; 19(4): 494–507.
18.
WhitlachC.Efficacy of interventions with caregivers: a re-analysis. Gerontologist1991; 31(1): 9–14.
19.
KinsellaG., CooperB., PictonC., MurtaghD.A review of the measurement of caregiver and family burden in palliative care. J Palliat Care1998; 14(2): 37–45.
20.
GrbichC., ParkerD., MaddocksI.The emotions and coping strategies of caregivers of family members with a terminal cancer. J Palliat Care.2001; 17(1): 30–36.
21.
The SAS System for Windows [computer program].Version 8.00.Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute, Inc., 1999.
22.
KawachiI., BerkmanL.F.Social ties and mental health. J Urban Health2001; 78(3): 458–467.
23.
SeemanT.E., McEwenB.S.Impact of social environment characteristics on neuroendocrine regulation. Psychosom Med1996; 58(5): 459–471.
24.
BerkmanL.F.The role of social relations in health promotion. Psychosom Med1995; 57(3): 245–254.
25.
EmanuelE.J., FaircloughD.L., SlutsmanJ., EmanuelL.L.Understanding economic and other burdens of terminal illness: the experience of patients and their caregivers. Ann Intern Med2000; 132(6): 451–459.
26.
CameronJ.I., FrancheR-L, CheungA.M., StewartD.E.Lifestyle interference and emotional distress in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients. Cancer2002; 94(2): 521–527.
27.
GilbarO.Gender as a predictor of burden and psychological distress of elderly husbands and wives of cancer patients. Psychooncology1999; 8(4): 287–294.
28.
HagedoornM., BuunkB.P., KuijerR.G., WobbesT., SandermanR.Couples dealing with cancer: role and gender differences regarding psychological distress and quality of life. Psychooncology2000; 9(3): 232–242.
29.
PrigersonH., CherlinE., ChenJ., KaslS., HurzelerR., BradleyE.The Stressful Caregiving Adult Reactions to Experiences of Dying (SCARED) Scale: a measure to assess caregiver exposures and responses in terminal care. [Submitted for publication, 2002.]
30.
KnightR., SayersA., GreenT., GrestiniR., PaceC.Love Matters. A profile of Connecticut Hospice. Caring2001; 20(2): 32–36.
31.
SorcinelleR., Johnson-HurzelerR., AbbottJ.W., ThistleD., FlatowF.A.Management and the dying patient: hospice, a life force. In: GalloJ.J., ReichelW. (eds). Reichel's Care of the Elderly: clinical aspects of aging.Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins, 1999; pp. 763–780.
