Although several instruments have been developed to measure the quality of life (QOL) of palliative care patients, a rigorous research study has not specifically asked patients themselves what is important to their QOL. It is, therefore, not clear whether these instruments measure what is most important to these patients’ QOL.
Purpose
To understand the primary determinants of the QOL of palliative care patients with cancer.
Method
The study used a qualitative paradigm. Participants were interviewed concerning what was important to their QOL. A systematic content analysis of the transcripts was carried out by all the investigators.
Results
Five broad domains were found to be important determinants of patient QOL: (1) the patient's own state, including physical and cognitive functioning, psychological state, and physical condition; (2) quality of palliative care; (3) physical environment; (4) relationships; and (5) outlook.
Conclusions
Existing instruments cover many of these domains, but no single instrument includes all of the relevant content. The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire, which we developed previously, has been revised based on these data.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WHO Expert Committee.Cancer Pain Relief and Palliative Care. WHO Technical Report Series 804. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1990.
2.
CohenS.R., MountB.M., StrobelM.G., BuiF.The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire: a measure of quality of life appropriate for people with advanced disease. A preliminary study of validity and acceptability. Palliat Med1995; 9: 207–219.
3.
CohenS.R., HassanS.A., LapointeB.J.Mount BM. Quality of life in HIV disease as measured by the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire. AIDS1996; 10: 1421–1427.
4.
CohenS.R., MountB.M., TomasJ., MountL.Existential well-being is an important determinant of quality of life: evidence from the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire. Cancer1996; 77: 576–586.
5.
CohenS.R., MountB.M., BrueraE., ProvostM., RoweJ., TongK.Validity of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire in the palliative care setting: a multi-centre Canadian study demonstrating the importance of the existential domain. Palliat Med1997; 11: 3–20.
6.
CohenS.R., MountB.M.Living with cancer: “Good” days and “bad” days—what produces them?Cancer2000; 89(8): 1854–1865.
7.
CohenS.R., BostonP., MountB.M., PorterfieldP.Changes in quality of life following admission to palliative care units. Palliat Med2001; 15: 363–371.
8.
CohenS.R., MountB.M.Quality of life assessment in terminal illness: defining and measuring subjective well-being in the dying. J Palliat Care1992; 8: 40–45.
9.
AndersonK.L., BurckhardtC.S.Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life as an outcome variable for health care intervention and research. J Adv Nurs1999; 29(2): 298–306.
10.
DegnerL.F., HenteleffP.D.The relationship between theory and measurement in evaluations of palliative care services. J Palliat Care1987; 3: 8–13.
11.
McMillanS.C., MahonM.A study of quality of life of hospice patients on admission and at week 3. Cancer Nurs1994; 17: 52–60.
12.
PadillaG.V., FerrellB., GrantM.M., RhinerM.Defining the content domain of quality of life for cancer patients with pain. Cancer Nurs1990; 13: 108–115.
13.
ChaturvediS.K.What's important for quality of life to Indians—in relation to cancer. Soc Sci Med1991; 33: 91–94.
14.
GreisingerA.J., LorimorR.J., AdayL.A., WinnR.J., BaileW.F.Terminally ill cancer patients. Their most important concerns. Cancer Pract1997; 5: 147–154.
15.
LevE.L.Dealing with loss: concerns of patients and families in a hospice setting. Clin Nurse Spec1991; 5(2): 87–93.
16.
WaldronD., O'BoyleC.A., KearneyM., MoriartyM., CarneyD.Quality-of-life measurement in advanced cancer: assessing the individual. J Clin Oncol1999; 17(11): 3603–3611.
17.
HearnJ., HigginsonI.Outcome measures in palliative care for advanced cancer patients: a review. J Public Health Med1997; 19(2): 193–199.
18.
TenoJ.M., ByockI., FieldM.J.Research agenda for developing measures to examine quality of care and quality of life of patients diagnosed with life-limiting illness. J Pain Symptom Manage1999; 17(2): 75–82.
19.
McGeeH.M., O'BoyleCa, HickeyA., O'MalleyK., JoyceC.R.Assessing quality of life of the individual: the SEIQoL with a healthy and gastroenterology unit population. Psychol Med1991; 21: 749–759.
20.
HickeyA.M., BuryG., O'BoyleC.A., BradleyF., O'KellyF.D., ShannonW.A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS. BMJ1996; 313: 29–33.
21.
CohenS.R.Defining and measuring quality of life in palliative care. In: BrueraE., PortenoyR. (eds). Topics in Palliative Care, volume 5.New York: Oxford University Press, 2001; pp. 137–156.
22.
CrabtreeB.F., MillerW.L.Doing Qualitative Research. Research Methods for Primary Care, volume 3. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1992.
23.
CobbA.K., HagemasterJ.N.Ten criteria for evaluating qualitative research proposals. J Nurs Educ1987; 26: 138–143.
24.
PattonM.Q.How to use qualitative methods in evaluation.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1987.
25.
PattonM.Q.Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2rd edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.
26.
SkevingtonS.M.Investigating the relationship between pain and discomfort and quality of life, using the WHOQOL. Pain1998; 76: 395–406.
27.
ChochinovH.M., HackT., McClementS., HarlosM., KristjansonL.Dignity in the terminally ill: a developing empirical model. Soc Sci Med2002; 54(3): 433–443.
28.
SeymourJ., ClarkD.Phenomenological approaches to palliative care research. Palliat Med1998; 12: 127–131.
