This paper presents an overview of a qualitative study of six recently discharged hospice patients, who had experienced at least two episodes of inpatient palliative care and who were interviewed about their experience of care. The resulting data formed a representation — the Circle of Care — with a central theme being the recognition of patient identity. Other emerging themes were: humour, being watched, caring manner, being safe, chosen isolation, relinquishment and relaxation, keeping control, awareness of mortality, recognition of the palliative care philosophy, and the effect of the aesthetic and spiritual environment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
van ManenM.Researching lived experience.Albany:State University of New York Press, 1990.
2.
van ManenM.Max van Manen. Workshop notes. Monash University, Churchill, Gippsland. January 23–25, 1995.
3.
KingA.The New Zealand Palliative Care Strategy.Wellington:Ministry of Health, 2001.
4.
McDonnellM.Patients perceptions of their care at Our Ladies Hospice, Dublin. Palliat Med1989; 3: 47–53.
5.
ArblasterG, BrooksD, HudsonR, PettyM.Terminally ill patients’ expectations of nurses. Aust J Adv Nurs1990; 7 (3):34–43.
6.
BergenA.Evaluating nursing care of the terminally ill in the community: a case study approach. Int J Nurs Stud1992; 29 (1):81–94.
7.
GatesM, LackeyN, WhiteM.Needs of hospice and clinic patients with cancer. Cancer Pract1995; 3 (4):226–232.
8.
SchmeleJ.Perception of a dying patient of the quality of care and caring: an interview with Ivan Hanson. J Nurs Care Qual1995; 9 (4):31–42.
9.
GreisingerA, LorimorR, AdayL, WinnR, BaileW.Terminally ill cancer patients: their most important concerns. Cancer Pract1997; 5 (3):147–155.
NormanI, RedfernS, TomalinD, OliverS.Developing Flanagan's critical incident technique to elicit indicators of high and low quality care from patients and their nurses. J Adv Nurs1992; (17): 590–600.
17.
AvisM, BondM, ArthurA.Satisfying solutions? A review of some unresolved issues in the measurement of patient satisfaction. J Adv Nurs1995; (22): 316–322.
18.
MahonP.An analysis of the concept ‘patient satisfaction’ as it relates to contemporary nursing care. J Adv Nurs1996; (24): 1241–1248.
19.
MillerK.Keeping the care in nursing care. J Nurs Adm1995; 25 (11):29–32.
20.
SnyderM.Critical thinking: a foundation for consumer-focused care. J Cont Ed Nurs1993; 24 (5):206–210.
21.
PriceP.Parents’ perceptions of the meaning of quality care. Adv Nurs Sci1993; 16 (1):33–41.
22.
SykesN, PearsonS, ChellS.Quality of care of the terminally ill: the carer's perspective. Palliat Med1992; 6: 227–236.
Ludwig-BeymerP, RyanC, JohnsonN, HennesseyK, GattusoM, EpsomR, . Using patient perceptions to improve quality care. J Nurs Care Qual1993; 7 (2):42–51.
27.
MeisenheimerC.The consumer: silent or intimate player in the quality revolution. Holistic Nurs Pract1991; 5 (3):39–50.
28.
Swanson-KaffmanK, SchonwaldE.Phenomenology. In: SarterB (ed). Paths to Knowledge.New York:National League of Nursing, 1988; pp. 97–105.
29.
RayM.The richness of phenomenology: philosophic, theoretic and methodologic concerns. In: MorseJ (ed). Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. London: Sage Publications, 1994; pp. 117–135.
30.
BennerP.The tradition and skill of interpretive phenomenology in studying health, illness and caring practices. In: BennerP (ed.) Interpretive Phenomenology.California:Sage Publications, 1994; pp. 99–129.
31.
SandelowskiM.“To be of use”: enhancing the utility of qualitative research. Nurs Outlook1997; 45 (3):125–132.
32.
SandelowskiM.The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Adv Nurs Sci1986; 83: 27–37.
33.
SandelowskiM.Rigor and rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Adv Nurs Sci1993; 162: 1–8.
34.
de RaeveL.Ethical issues in palliative care research. Palliat Med1994; 8: 292–305.
35.
SpeckP.Consideration of consent in clinical research. Palliat Med1996; 10: 163–164.
36.
ArandaS.Conducting research with the dying: ethical considerations and experience. Int J Palliat Nurs1995; 1 (1):41–47.
37.
CornerJ.Is there a research paradigm for palliative care?Palliat Med1996; 10: 201–208.
38.
FieldD, DouglasC, JaggerC, DandP.Terminal illness: views of patients and their lay-carers. Palliat Med1995; 9: 45–54.
39.
GrayR, FitchM, GreenburgM, ShapiroS.Consumer participation in cancer service planning. J Palliat Care1995; 11 (4):27–33.
40.
WakefieldM, AshbyM.Attitudes of surviving relatives to terminal care in South Australia. J Pain Symptom Manage1993; 8 (8):529–538.
41.
GiordanoB.Quality is in the eye of the consumer. AORN J1994; 59 (4):792–795.
42.
KyleT.The concept of caring: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs1995; 21: 506–514.
43.
BrownL.The experience of care: patients’ perspectives. Top Clin Nurs1986; 8: 56–62.
44.
DysonJ.Nurses’ conceptualisations of caring attitudes and behaviours. J Adv Nurs1996; 23: 1263–1269.
45.
ForrestD.The experience of caring. J Adv Nurs.1989; 14: 815–823.
46.
GendronD.The tapestry of care. Adv Nurs Sci1994; 17 (1):25–30.
47.
O'HenleyA, CurzioJ, HuntJ.Palliative care services and settings: improving care. Int J Palliat Nurs1997; 3 (4):227–231.
48.
PeplerC, LynchA.Relational messages of control in nurse-patient interactions with terminally ill patients with AIDS and cancer. J Palliat Care1991; 7: 18–29.
