President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 1983.
2.
RuarkJ.E., RaffinT.A. the Stanford University Medical Center Committee on Ethics. Initiating and withdrawing life support. Principles and practice in adult medicine. N Engl J Med1988; 318: 25–30.
3.
BoneR.C., RackowE.C., WegJ.G., Members of the ACCP/SCCM Consensus Panel. Ethical and moral guidelines for the initiation, continuation, and withdrawal of intensive care. Chest1990; 97: 949–957.
4.
Task Force on Ethics of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.Consensus report on the ethics of foregoing life-sustaining treatments in the critically ill. Crit Care Med1990; 18: 1435–1439.
5.
American Thoracic Society.Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Ann Intern Med1991; 115: 478–484.
6.
The Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee.Attitudes of critical care medicine professionals concerning forgoing life-sustaining treatments. Crit Care Med1992; 20: 320–326.
7.
Forgoing life-supporting or death-prolonging therapy: a policy statement.Cleve Clin J Med1993; 60: 81–5.
8.
CMA Policy Summary.Advanced directives for resuscitation and other life-saving or sustaining measures. CMAJ1992; 146(6): 1072A.
9.
Special Senate Committee on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide.Of Life and Death.Ottawa, June 1995.
10.
The Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care Medicine's Ethics Committee regarding futile and other possibly inadvisable treatments. Crit Care Med1997; 25: 887–891.
11.
CMA Policy.Joint statement on preventing and resolving ethical conflicts involving health care providers and persons receiving care. CMAJ1999; 160(12): 1757–1760.
12.
Medical futility in end of life care.Report of the council on ethical and judicial affairs. JAMA1999; 281: 937–941.
13.
Multifaith Information Manual1995. Ontario Multifaith Council on Spiritual and Religious Care, Publishing Trust Committee, 35 McCaul Street, Suite 200, Toronto, ON M5T 107. Tel: (416) 326–6867. Fax: (416) 326–6858.
14.
IrishD.P., LundquistK.F., NelsenV.J. (eds). Ethnic Variation in Dying, Death and Grief: Diversity in Universality.Washington, D.C.: Taylor and Francis, 1993.
Faber-LangendoenK.The clinical management of dying patients receiving mechanical ventilation – a survey of physician practice. Chest1994; 106: 880–888.
17.
LeeD.K.P., SwinburneA.J., FedulloA.J., WahlG.W.Withdrawing care: experience in a medical intensive care unit. JAMA1994; 271: 1358–1361.
18.
WegJ.G.: To live, to keep alive, to let die. Chest1994; 106: 1646–1648.
19.
AschD.A., Hansen-FlaschenJ., LankenP.N.Decisions to limit or continue life-sustaining treatment by critical care physicians in the United States: conflicts between physicians’ practices and patients’ wishes. Am J Resp Crit Care Med1995; 151: 288–292.
20.
CookD.J., GuyattG.H., JaeschkeR., ReeveJ., SpanierA., KingD.Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. JAMA1995; 273: 703–708.
21.
LuceJ.M.Physicians do not have a responsibility to provide futile or unreasonable care if a patient or family insists. Crit Care Med1995; 23: 760–766.
22.
The SUPPORT Principle Investigators.A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA1995; 274: 1591–1598.
23.
WoodG.G., MartinE.Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy in a Canadian intensive care unit. Can J Anaesth1995; 42: 186–191.
24.
Faber-LangendoenK.A multi-institutional study of care given to patients dying in hospitals. Arch Intern Med1996; 156: 2130–2136.
25.
BrodyH., CampbellM.L., Faber-LangendoenK., OgleK.S.Withdrawing intensive life-sustaining treatment – recommendations for compassionate clinical care. N Engl J Med1997; 336: 652–657.
26.
HofmannJ.C., WengerN.S., DavisR.B., TenoJ., ConnorsA.F.Jr., DesbiensN, Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. Ann Intern Med1997; 127: 1–12.
27.
KeenanS.P., BuscheK.D., ChenL.M., McCarthyL., InmanK.J., SibbaldW.J.A retrospective review of a large cohort of patients undergoing the process of withholding or withdrawal of life support. Crit Care Med1997; 25: 1324–1331.
28.
LaveryJ.V., DickensB.M., BoyleJ.M., SingerP.A.Bioethics for clinicians: 11. Euthanasia and assisted suicide. CMAJ1997; 156: 1405–1408.
29.
OrentlicherD.The Supreme Court and physician-assisted suicide. Rejecting assisted suicide but embracing euthanasia. N Engl J Med1997; 337: 1236–1239.
30.
PrendergastT.J., LuceJ.M.Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Resp Crit Care Med1997; 155: 15–20.
31.
EmanuelE.J., DanielsE.R., FaircloughD.L., ClarridgeB.R.The practice of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the United States. Adherence to proposed safeguards and effects on physicians. JAMA1998; 280: 507–513.
32.
KeenanS.P., BuscheK.D., ChenL.M., EsmailR., InmanK.J., SibbaldW.J.Withdrawal and withholding of life support in the intensive care unit: A comparison of teaching and community hospitals. Crit Care Med1998; 26: 245–251.
33.
PrendergastT.J., ClaessensM.T., LuceJ.M.A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Resp Crit Care Med1998; 158: 1163–1167.
34.
WalterS.D., CookD.J., GuyattG.H., SpanierA., JaeschkeR., ToddT.R.Confidence in life-support decisions in the intensive care unit: A survey of healthcare workers. Crit Care Med1998; 26: 44–49.
35.
AschD.A., Faber-LangendoenK., SheaJ.A., ChristakisN.A.The sequence of withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from patients. Am J Med1999; 107: 153–156.
36.
CookD.J., GiacominiM., JohnsonN., WillmsD.Life support in the intensive care unit: a qualitative investigation of technological purposes. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. CMAJ1999; 161: 1109–1113.
37.
DanisM., FedermanD., FinsJ.J., FoxE., KastenbaumB., LankenP.N.Incorporating palliative care into critical care education: principles, challenges, and opportunities. Crit Care Med1999; 27: 2005–2013.
38.
EschunG.M., JacobsohnE., RobertsD., SneidermanB.Ethical and practical considerations of withdrawal of treatment in the intensive care unit. Can J Anaesth1999; 46: 497–504.
39.
HamelM.B., TenoJ.M., GoldmanL., LynnJ., DavisR.B., GalanosA.N.Patient age and decisions to withhold life-sustaining treatments from seriously ill, hospitalized adults. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Ann Intern Med1999; 130: 116–125.
40.
Principe-RodriguezK., Rodriguez-CintronW., Torres-PalaciosA., Casai-HidalgoJ.Substituted judgement: should life-support decisions be made by a surrogate?P R Health Sci J1999; 18: 405–409.
41.
VincentJ.L.Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: the results of an ethical questionnaire. Crit Care Med1999; 27: 1626–1633.
42.
McLeanR.F., TarshisJ., MazerC.D., SzalaiJ.P.Death in two Canadian intensive care units: institutional difference and changes over time. Crit Care Med2000; 28: 100–103.