Increasingly, palliative patients and their families are going online. A series of cases are presented to explore the reasons they go online and the effects of their online activity, both harmful and beneficial. This paper highlights the need to take this growing phenomenon and its effects on patient care seriously, and identifies key areas that need to be explored further.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EngT.R., MaxfieldA., PatrickK., DeeringM.J., RatzanS.C., GustafsonD.H.Access to health information and support. A public highway or a private road?JAMA1998; 280: 1371–1375.
2.
BrownM.The HealthNet retrievers: profiles of consumers using online health and medical information.New York: Cyber Dialogue; 1998.
3.
PereiraJ., ManciniI., WalkerP.The role of bisphosphonates in malignant bone pain: a review. J Palliat Care1998; 14: 25–36
4.
BuchananJ., BorlandR., CosoloW., MillershipR., HainesI., ZimetA.Patients’ beliefs about cancer management. Support Care Cancer1996; 4: 110–117.
5.
CassilethB.R., ZupkisR.V., Sutton-SmithK., MarchB.A.Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med1980; 92: 832–836.
6.
StrullW.M., BernardL.O., CharlesG.Do patients want to participate in medical decision-making?JAMA1984; 252: 2990–2994.
7.
DeberR.B., KraetschmerN., IrvineJ.What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?Arch Intern Med1996; 156: 1414–1420.
8.
KaplanS.H., GreenfieldS., GandekB., RogersW.H., WareJ.E.J.Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Intern Med1996; 124: 497–504.
9.
KassirerJ.P.The next transformation in the delivery of health care. N Engl J Med.1995; 332: 52–54.
10.
BlumenthalD.The future of quality measurement and management in a transforming health care system. JAMA1997; 278: 1622–1625.
11.
GogginsM., LietmanA., MillerR.E., YeoC.J., JaffeeE., ColemanJ.Use and benefits of web site for pancreatic cancer. JAMA1998; 280: 1309–1310.
12.
GroveA.S.The X factor. JAMA1998, 280: 1385.
13.
CoeiraE.The Internet's challenge to health care provision. Br Med J1996; 312: 3–4.
14.
WidmanL.E., TongD.A.Requests for medical advice from patients and families to health care providers who publish on the World Wide Web. Arch Intern Med1997; 157: 209–212.
15.
DownerS.M., CodyM.M., McCluskeyP., WilsonP.D., Arno«S.J., ListerT.A.Pursuit and practice of complementary therapies by cancer patients receiving conventional treatment. Br Med J1994; 309: 86–89.
16.
BegbieS.P., KerestesZ.L., BellD.R.Patterns of alternative medicine use by cancer patients. Med J Aust1996; 165: 545–548.
17.
RisbergT., LundE., WistE., DahlO., SundstromS., AndersenO.K.The use of non-proven therapy among patients treated in Norwegian oncological departments: a cross-sectional national multi-centre study. Eur J Cancer1995; 31A(11): 1785–1789.
18.
OneschukD., FennellL., HansonJ., BaieraE.The use of complementary medications by cancer patients attending an outpatient pain and symptom clinic. J Pall Care1998; 14: 21–26.
19.
AstinJ.A.Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. JAMA1998; 279: 1548–1553.
20.
FisherP., WardA.Complementary medicine in Europe. Br Med J1994; 309: 107–111.
21.
MacLennanA.H., WilsonD.H., TaylorA.W.Prevalence and cost of alternative medicine in Australia. Lancet1996; 347: 569–573.
22.
EisenbergD.M., DavisR.B., EttnerS.L., AppelS., WilkeyS., Van RompayM.Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997. Results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA1998; 280: 1569–1575.
23.
BowerH.Internet sees growth of unverified health claims. Br Med J1996; 313: 381
24.
EysenbachG., DiepgenT.L.Patients looking for information on the Internet and seeking teleadvice: motivations, expectations and misconceptions as expressed in e-mails sent to physicians. Arch Dermatol1999; 135: 151–156.
25.
ErnstE., ReschK.L., HillS.Do complementary practitioners have a better bedside manner than physicians?J R Soc Med1997; 90: 33–39.
26.
HollandJ.C.Why patients seek unproven cancer remedies: a psychological perspective. CA Cancer J Clin1982; 32: 11–15.
27.
CassilethB.R., LuskE.J., StrouseT.B., BodenheimerB.J.Contemporary unorthodox treatments in cancer medicine: a study of patients, treatments, and practitioners. Ann Intern Med1984; 101: 105–112.
28.
BorowitzS.M., WyattJ.C.The origin, content, and workload of email consultations. JAMA1998; 280: 1321–1324.
29.
RobinsonT.N.Community health behaviour change through computer network health promotion: preliminary findings from Stanford Health-Net. Comput Methods Programs Biomed1989; 30: 137–144.
30.
LockeS.E., KowaloffH.B., HoffR.G., SafranC., PopovskyM.A., CottonD.J.Computer-based interview for screening blood donors for risk of HIV transmission. JAMA1992; 268: 1301–1305.
31.
GustafsonD.H., McTavishF., HawkinsR., PingreeS., AroraN., MendenhallJ.Computer support for elderly woman with breast cancer. JAMA1998; 280: 1305.
32.
FergusonT.Health Information Online: how to find health information, support groups, and self-help communities in cyberspace.Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1996.
33.
PetersR., SikorskiR.Digital dialogue: sharing information and interests on the Internet. JAMA1997; 277: 1256–1260.
34.
GustafsonD.H., HawkinsR.P., BobergE.W., BrickerE., PingreeS., ChanC.L.The use and impact of a computer-based support system for people living with AIDS and HIV infection. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care1994; 604–608.
35.
WeinbergN., SchmaleJ., UkenJ., WesselK.Online help: cancer patients participate in a computer-mediated support group. Health Soc Work1996; 21: 24–29.
36.
MayerM., TillJ.E.The Internet: a modern Pandora's box?Qual Life Res1996; 5: 568–571.
37.
FernsterJ.I., ManchesteerU.Evaluation of a computer-based cancer support network. Cancer Pract1997; 5: 46–51.
38.
ScolamieroS.J.Support groups in cyberspace. MD Comput1997; 14: 12–14.
39.
KlemmP., ReppertK., VisichL.A non-traditional cancer support group: the Internet. Comput Nurs1998; 16: 33–36.
40.
SonnenbergF.A.Health information on the Internet: opportunities and pitfalls. Arch Intern Med1997; 157: 151–152.
41.
SilbergW.M., LundbergG.D., MusacchioR.A.Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor — let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA, 1997; 277: 1244–1245.
42.
WeisbordS.D., SouleJ.B., KimmelP.L.Poison on line — acute renal failure caused by oil of wormwood purchased through the Internet. New Engl J Med1997; 337: 825–827.
43.
StephensonJ.Patient pretenders weave tangled “Web” of deceit. JAMA1998; 280: 1297.
44.
BuckmanR.How to break bad news: a guide for health care professionals.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992; pp. 65–97.
45.
FeldmanM.D., BibbyM., CritesS.D.‘Virtual’ factitious disorders and Munchausen by proxy. West J Med1998; 168: 537–539.
46.
WeijerC., SingerP.A., DickensB.M., WorkmanS.Bioethics for clinicians: dealing with demands for inappropriate treatment. CMAJ1998; 159: 817–821.
47.
PicardEl, RobertsonG.B.Legal liability of doctors and hospitals in Canada. 3rd edition.Scarborough: Carswell, 1996; pp. 235–269.
48.
GatehouseJ.Taking up Tyrol's fight. National Post1999; May 11: A3.
49.
KrishnaS., BalasE.A., SpencerD.C., GriffinJ.Z., BorenS.A.Clinical trials of interactive computerized patient education: implications for family practice. J Fam Pract1997; 45: 25–33.
50.
RobinsonT.N., PatrickK., EngT.R., GustafsonD.An evidence-based approach to interactive health communication: a challenge to medicine in the information age. JAMA1998; 280: 1264–1269.
51.
TaylorE.Interactive technology enters realm of cancer education. J Natl Cancer Inst1994; 7C: 37–38.
52.
BuhleE.L.Jr., GoldweinJ.J.W., BenjaminI.OncoLink: a multimedia oncology information resource on the Internet. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care1994; XX: 103–107.
53.
BaderS.A., BraudeR.M.“Patient Informatics”: creating new partnerships in medical decision making. Acad Med1998; 73: 408–411.
54.
KahnG.Computer-based patient education: a progress report. MD Comput1993; 10(2): 93–99.
55.
TangP.C., JaworskiM.A., FelencerCA, KreiderN., La RosaM.P., MarquardtW.C.Clinician information activities in diverse ambulatory care practices. Proc AMIA Ann Fall Symp1996; 12–16.
56.
CalkinsD.R., DavisR.B., ReileyP., PhillipsR.S., PineoK.L., DelbancoT.L.Patient-physician communication at hospital discharge and patients’ understanding of the postdischarge treatment plan. Arch Intern Med1997; 157: 1026–1030
57.
FallowfieldL., HallA., MaguireG.P., BaumM.Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial. Br Med J1990; 301: 575–580.
BuchananJ., BorlandR., CosoloW., MillershipR., HainesI., ZimetA.Patients’ beliefs about cancer management. Support Care Cancer1996; 4: 110–117.
60.
PereiraJ., BrueraE.The Internet as a resource for palliative care arid hospice: a review and proposals. J Pain Symptom Manage1998; 16: 59–68.
61.
SikorskiR., PetersR.Where to find reliable cancer information on the Internet. JAMA1997; 277: 1431–1432.
62.
EisenbergD.M.Advising patients who seek alternative medical therapies. Ann Intern Med1997; 127: 61–69.
63.
ChapmanC.R.The World Wide Web: a pain and symptom control resource for professionals and the public. J Pharm Care in Pain & Symp Control1998; 6: 23–35.
64.
MackillopW.J., StewartW.E., GinsburgA.D., StewartS.S.Cancer patients perceptions of their disease and its treatment. Br J Cancer1988; 58: 355–358.
65.
JenkinsC., ScarfeA., BrueraE.Integration of palliative care with alternative medicine in patients who have refused curative cancer therapy: a report of two cases. J Palliat Care1998; 14: 55–59.
66.
EisenbergD.M., KesslerR.C., FosterC., NorlockF.E., CalkinsD.R., DelbancoT.L.Unconventional medicine in the United States: prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med1993; 328: 246–252.
67.
Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA1992; 268: 2420–2425.
68.
BiermannJ.S., GooloadayG.J., GreenfieldMLVH, BakerL.H.Evaluation of cancer information on the Internet. Cancer1999; 86: 381–390.
69.
WyattJ.Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the world wide web. Br Med J1997; 314: 1879–1880.
70.
Health On The Net Foundation.Health On The Net code of conduct (HONcode) for medical and health web sites. Available at: http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html. Accessed October 22, 1999.
71.
JadadA.R., GagliardiA.Rating health information of the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel?JAMA1998, 279: 611–614.
72.
ImpicciatoreP., PandolfiC., CasellaN., BonatiM.Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: a systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. Br Med J1997; 314: 1875–1879.
73.
Juhling McClungH., MurrayR.D., HeitlingerL.A.The Internet as a source for current patient information. Pediatrics1998; 101: 1065.
74.
StrullW.M., BernardL.O., CharlesG.Do patients want to participate in medical decision-making?JAMA1984; 252: 2990–2994.
75.
WinkerM.A., FlanaginA., Chi-LumB., WhiteJ., AndrewsK., KennettR.L.Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the Internet: principles governing AMA Web sites. JAMA2000; 283: 1600–1606.
76.
LewisP.H.Follow-up survey reports growth and Internet users. New York Times1996; August 14: D2.
77.
BursteinH.J., GelberS., GuadagnoliE., WeeksJ.C.Use of alternative medicine by women with early-stage breast cancer. New Engl J Med1999; 340: 1733–1739.
