Can new information and communications technologies increase citizen participation in civic life and promote community development? Worldwide studies of community information systems demonstrate that new technologies can enhance the effectiveness of activists. However, there has been little evidence that they bring in new participants. This article argues that e-government systems can, if properly designed and implemented, involve citizens who have not previously been active in local community life, and describes an Irish pilot project which has this capacity. The success of such systems depends not only on design issues, but also on the willingness of government to respond to the resulting policy inputs by citizens.
AgreP. E.2002‘Real-Time Politics: The Internet and the Political Process’, The Information Society18:311–31.
2.
AgreP. E.2004‘The Practical Republic: Social skills and the progress of citizenship’, pp. 201–23 in FeenbergA.BarneyD. (eds) Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
3.
ArnoldM.GibbsM. R.2003‘Intranets and local community: “yes, an intranet is all very well, but do we still get free beer and barbeque?’”, pp. 185–204 in HuysmanM.WengerE.WulfV. (eds), Communities and Technologies. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4.
BantonM. (ed.) 1968The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies. London: Tavistock.
5.
BarringtonT. J.1975From Big Government to Local Government. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
6.
BellC.NewbyH.1971Community Studies. London: George Allen & Unwin.
7.
BerkowitzS. D.1982An introduction to structural analysis. Toronto: Butterworths.
DocterS.DuttonW. H.1998‘The First Amendment online: Santa Monica's public electronic network’, pp. 125–51 in TsagarousianouR.TambiniD.BryanC. (eds), Cyberdemocracy: Technology, Cities and Civic Networks. London: Routledge.
16.
EtzioniA.2004‘On Virtual, Democratic Communities’, pp. 225–38 in FeenbergA.BarneyD. (eds), Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and Practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
FarrJ.2004‘Social Capital: A conceptual history’, Political Theory, 32 (1): 6–33.
19.
FrankenbergR.1969Communities in Britain: Social Life in Town and Country. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
20.
GluckmanM.1971Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
21.
HaaseT.PratschkeJ.2003Digital Divide: Analysis of the uptake of information technology in the Dublin region. Dublin: Dublin Employment Pact.
22.
HamptonK.WellmanB.2000‘Examining community in the digital neighborhood: Early results from Canada's wired suburb’, pp. 194–208 in IshidaT.IsbisterK. K. (eds), Digital Cities: Technologies, Experiences and Future Prospects. Berlin: Springer.
23.
HamptonK. N.WellmanB.2002‘The not so global village of Netville’, pp. 345–71 in WellmanB.HaythornthwaiteC. (eds), The Internet in Everyday Life. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
24.
HollandP. W.LeinhardtS. (eds) 1979Perspectives on Social Network Research. New York: Academic Press.
25.
HuysmanM.WengerE. (eds) 2003Communities and Technologies. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
KavanaughA. L.IsenhourP. L.2005‘Information Technology in Support of Public Deliberation’, in BesselaarP. V. D.de MichelisG.PreeceJ.Communities and Technologies 2005. Dordrecht: Springer.
28.
KavanaughA. L.PattersonS. J.2002‘The impact of community computer networks on social capital and community involvement in Blacksburg’, pp. 325–44 in WellmanB.HaythornthwaiteC. (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life. Oxford: Blackwell.
29.
KavanaughA. L.ReeseD. D.2003‘Weak ties in networked communities’, pp. 265–86 in HuysmanM.WengerE.WulfV. (eds), Communities and Technologies. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
30.
KitchinR.1998Cyperspace: The World in the Wires. Chichester: Wiley.
31.
KolkoB.ReidE.1998‘Dissolution and fragmentation: Problems in on-line communities’, pp. 212–29 in JonesS. G. (ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
KollockP.1999‘The economies of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace’, pp. 220–39 in SmithM. A.KollockP. (eds), Communities in Cyberspace. London: Routledge.
33.
KomitoL.1983‘Development plan rezonings: The political pressures’, pp. 293–302 in BlackwellJ.ConveryF. (eds), Promise and Performance: Irish Environmental Policies Analysed. Dublin: Resource and Environmental Policy Centre, University College Dublin.
34.
KomitoL.1985Politics and Clientelism in Urban Ireland: Information, Reputation, and Brokerage. PhD University of Pennsylvania. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI no. AAD86–03660.
35.
KomitoL.1998‘The Net as a foraging society: Flexible communities’, The Information Society, 14 (2): 97–106.
36.
KomitoL.2001‘Electronic community in the Information Society: Paradise, mirage or malaise?’, Journal of Documentation, 57 (1): 115–29.
37.
KomitoL.2004The Information Revolution and Ireland: Prospects and Challenges. Dublin: UCD Press.
MacintoshA.2004‘Characterising E-Participation in Policy-Making’. 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
40.
MaussM.1967The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. New York: W. W. Norton.
41.
McCaffreyC.2003The Digital Divide in the EU: National Policies and Access to ICTs in the Member States. Dublin: Oscail – National Distance Education Centre, Dublin City University, http://www.oscail.ie/caffrey.pdf
McQuillanH.2002‘Ennis Information Age Town: Virtuality Rooted in Reality’, pp. 139–51 in TanabeM.v. d. BesselaarP.IshidaT. (eds), Digital Cities II: Computational and Sociological Approaches. Berlin: Springer.
44.
MitchellJ. C. (ed.) 1969Social Networks in Urban Situations. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
45.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration2002A Nation Online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Commerce.
46.
NewtonK.1999‘Social capital and democracy in modern Europe’, pp. 3–24 in van DethJ. W.MaraffiM.NewtonK. (eds) Social Capital and European Democracy. London: Routledge.
47.
NieN. H.2001‘Sociability, interpersonal relations and the internet: Reconciling conflicting findings’, American Behavioral Scientist, 45 (3): 420–35.
48.
NieN. H.HillygusD. S.2002‘Internet Use, Interpersonal Relations, and Sociability: A time diary study’, pp. 215–43 in WellmanB.HaythornthwaiteC. (eds), The Internet in Everyday Life. Oxford: Blackwell.
49.
O'DonnellS.2001Towards an inclusive Information Society in Europe: The role of voluntary organisations. Information Society Technologies Research Programme, European Commission.
50.
O'DonnellS.McQuillanH.2003eInclusion: Expanding the Information Society in Ireland. Dublin: Information Society Commission.
O'DonnellS.TrenchB.1998Weak connections: Final report of the research project The Voluntary Sector in the Information Age. Dublin: Dublin City University.
53.
OlsonM.1965The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development2003Promise and Problems of E-Democracy: Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
55.
PEW Internet and American Life Project2001‘Online communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties’, http://www.pewinternet.org.
56.
PiggK. E.CrankL. D.2004‘Building Community Social Capital: The Potential and Promise of Information and Communications Technologies’, Journal of Community Informatics, 1 (1): 58–73.
57.
PolanyiK.1957The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
58.
PortesA.LandoltP.1996‘Unsolved Mysteries: The Tocqueville Files II. The Downside of Social Capital’, The American Prospect, 7, 26.
PutnamR. D.2000Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. New York: Simon & Schuster.
61.
PutnamR. D.LeonardiR.1993Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
RheingoldH.1994The Virtual Community: Finding Connection in a Computerised World. London: Seeker & Warburg.
63.
RobinsK.WebsterF.1986Information Society: Post-Industrial Society or Capitalist Control. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
64.
RobinsK.WebsterF.1987‘Information as capital: A critique of Daniel Bell’, pp. 95–117 in SlackJ. D.FejesF. (eds), The Ideology of the Information Age. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
65.
RocheD.1982Local Government in Ireland. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
66.
RothsteinB.2003‘Social Capital, Economic Growth and Quality of Government: The causal mechanism’, New Political Economy, 8 (1): 49–73.
67.
SahlinsM.1972Stone Age Economics. Chicago: Aldine.
SmithM. A.KollockP. (eds) 1999Communities in Cyberspace. London: Routledge.
70.
TsagarousianouR.TambiniD. (eds) 1998Cyberdemocracy: Technology, Cities and Civic Networks. London: Routledge.
71.
Van der EijkC.FranklinM. N.1996Choosing Europe?: The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
72.
WassermanS.FaustK.1994Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73.
WatsonN.1997‘Why we argue about virtual community: A case study of the phish.net fan community’, pp. 102–32 in JonesS.G. (ed.) Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety. London: Sage.
74.
WellmanB.1988‘The community question re-evaluated’, pp. 81–107 in SmithM. P. (ed.) Power, Community and the City. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
75.
WellmanB, 1996‘Are personal communities local? A Dumptarian reconsideration’, Social Networks18: 347–54.
76.
WellmanB, (ed.) 1999Networks in the Global Village: Life in Contemporary Communities. Boulder, CO: Westview.
77.
WellmanB.BerkowitzS. D.1988Social Structures: A Network Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78.
WellmanB.HaythornthwaiteC. A. (eds) 2002The Internet in Everyday Life. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
79.
WellmanB.Quan-HaaseA.2003‘The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism’, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 8 (3). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol8/issue3/
