Pléitear stair an chraolacháin Ghaeilge thar na cúig bliana is seachtó ó thosaigh an stáisiún raidió 2RN, suas go dtí an lá atá inniu ann agus teacht TG4. Cuirtear an argóint chun cinn go bhfuil coimhlint ann idir dhá idé-eolaíocht – bíonn daoine ag súil go mbeidh TG4 in ann freastal ar an mhionlach a labhrann Gaeilge agus teacht ar airgead ó fhógraíocht a bhíonn ag brath ar lucht féachana níos mó ná mar atá ar fáil i measc lucht labhartha na Gaeilge amháin. Ar an lámh eile de thig le TG4 ról tábhachtach a bheith aici mar réimse miotasach inar féidir le Gaeilgeoirí a bhféiniúlacht a dhlisteanú.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaudrillardJ.1983. In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities. New York: Semiotext(e).
2.
CarpignanoP.AndersenR.AronowitzS.DifazioW., 1990. ‘Chatter in the Age of Electronic Reproduction: Talk Television and the “Public Mind”’, Social Text25/26: pp. 33–55.
3.
DahlgrenP.1991. ‘Introduction,’ i DahlgrenP. agus SparksC. (eagí) Communication and Citizenship: Journalism and the Public Sphere. London: Routledge.
4.
DahlgrenP. agus SparksC.1991. (eagí) Communication and Citizenship: Journalism and the Public Sphere. London: Routledge.
5.
DahlgrenP.1995. Television and the Public Sphere: Citizenship, Democracy and the Media. London: Sage.
6.
Department of Arts, Culture and the Gaeltacht. 1995. Active or Passive? Broadcasting in the Future Tense, Green Paper on Broadcasting. Dublin: Stationery Office.
7.
DoolanL.DowlingJ. agus QuinnB.1969. Sit Down and be Counted: The Cultural Evolution of a Television Station. Dublin: Wellington Publishers Ltd.
8.
GorhamM.1967. Forty Years of Broadcasting. Dublin: RTÉ.
9.
HellerM.NemediD.RényiR., 1994. ‘Structural Changes in the Hungarian Public Sphere under State Socialism’, Comparative Social Research14: pp. 157–171.
10.
HouriganN.1998. ‘Framing Processes and the Celtic Television Campaigns’, Irish Journal of Sociology8: 49–70.
11.
JensenK.1990. ‘The politics of polysemy: Television news, everyday consciousness and political action’, Media, Culture and Society12: pp. 57–77.
12.
KellyM.1992. ‘The Media and National Identity in Ireland,’ lgh 75–90 i ClancyP. (eagí) Ireland and Poland: Comparative Perspectives. Dublin: Department of Sociology, University College Dublin.
13.
Meitheal Oibre ar Chraolachán Teilifíse Trí Ghaeilge1987. Tuarascáil d'Aire na Gaeltachta agus don Aire Cumarsáide. Baile Átha Cliath: Oifig an tSoláthair.
14.
RiagáinP. Ó.1988. ‘Introduction’, Language Planning in Ireland: InternationalJournal of the Sociology of Language70, lgh 5–9.
15.
O'DowdL.1992. ‘State Legitimacy and Nationalism in Ireland,’ lgh 25–42 i ClancyP. (eagí), Ireland and Poland: Comparative Perspectives. Dublin: Department of Sociology, University College Dublin.
16.
WatsonI.1996. ‘The Irish Language and Television: National identity, preservation, restoration and minority rights’, British Journal of Sociology47: 2, lgh 255–74.
17.
WatsonI.1997a. ‘A History of Irish Language Broadcasting: National Ideology, Commercial Interest and Minority Rights,’ lgh 212–30 i KellyM. agus O'ConnorB. (eagí) Media Audiences in Ireland: Power and Cultural Identity. Dublin: UCD Press.
18.
WatsonI.1997b. ‘Teilifís na Gaeilge as a Public Sphere’, Irish Communications Review 7.
