L'objet de cette recherche est de vérifier si, comme
l'affirment Cronin et Taylor (1992), mesurer la qualité de service
par un score de différence n'ajoute rien à la
prédiction empirique de ses composantes. Une première partie
présente les deux principales approches de la qualité de service :
l'approche par l'évaluation des écarts et
l'approche analytique des performances de l'entreprise. Une
seconde partie compare, sur les critères de fiabilité et de
validité, deux versions adaptées des échelles de
Parasuraman, Zeithaml et Berry (1988) et de Cronin et Taylor (1992). Les
résultats obtenus confirment que SERVQUAL et SERVPERF évaluent
bien le même construit mais ce dernier est appréhendé de
façon différente. SERVQUAL est un bon outil de mesure permettant
d'obtenir, à un instant donné, le niveau de qualité
de service perçue d'un acheteur. Alors que SERVPERF est une
formule expliquant comment ce niveau d'attitude a été
atteint.
AverousB.
(1993), Pour améliorer la qualité
de service. Les choix méthodologiques de la Régie des
Transports de Marseille, Revue Française du
Marketing, 144–145,
4–5,
125–134
2.
AndersonJ.
C.GerbingD.
W. (1982),
Some Methods for Respecifying Measurement Models to Obtain
Unidimensional Construct Measure-ment, Journal of
Marketing Research, 19, 4,
453–460
3.
BabakusE.BollerG.W.
(1992), An Empirical Assessment of the SERVQUAL
Scale, Journal of Business Research,
24, 2,
253–268
4.
BenMiled
H.LeLouarn
P. (1994),
Analyse comparative de deux échelles de mesure du
leadership d'opinion: Validité et
interprétation, Recherche et Application en
Marketing, 9, 4,
23–51
5.
BossJ.-P.
(1993), Pourquoi la satisfaction des
clients?, Revue française du
marketing, 144–145,
4–5,
5–27
6.
CampbellD.
T. (1960),
Recommendations for ATA Tests Standards Regarding Construct,
Trait or Discriminant Validity, American
Psychologist, 15, 8,
546–553
7.
CampbellD.
T.FiskeD.
W. (1959),
Convergent and Discriminant Validation by
Multitrait-multimethod Matrix, Psychological
Bulletin, 56, 1,
81–105
8.
CarmanJ.
M. (1990),
Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality: An Assessment of the
SERVQUAL Dimensions, Journal of Retailing,
66, 1,
33–55
9.
ChurchillG.
(1979), A Paradigm for Developing Better
Measures of Marketing Constructs, Journal of
Marketing Research, 16, 1,
64–72
10.
11.
CortinaJ.
M. (1993),
What is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory
and Applications, Journal of Applied
Psychology, 78, 1,
98–104
12.
CroninJ.
J.TaylorS.
A. (1992),
Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and
Extension, Journal of Marketing,
56, 3,
55–68
13.
CroninJ.
J.TaylorS.
A. (1994),
SERVPERF Versus SERVQUAL: Reconciling Performance-Based and
Perceptions-Minus-Expectations Measurement of Service
Quality, Journal of Marketing,
58, 1,
125–131
14.
CoxE.
P. (1980),
The Optimal Number of Reponse Alternatives for a Scale: A
Review, Journal of Marketing Research,
17, 4,
407–422
15.
DawkinsP.Reichhed
(1990), Customer Retention as a Competitive
Weapon, Directors and Boards,
14, 42–47
16.
EiglierP.LangeardE.
(1987), Servuction — le marketing des
services, Paris, Mc
Graw-Hill
17.
EiglierP.LangeardE.DagevilleC.
(1989), La qualité de
services, Revue Française du
Marketing, 121, 1,
93–100
18.
EvrardY.PrasB.RouxE.
(1993), Market: études et recherches en
marketing, Paris,
Nathan
19.
FeyR.GogueJ.M.
(1981), La maîtrise de la
qualité, Paris,
Les Editions
d'Organisation
20.
FinnD.
W.LambC.
J. (1991),
An Evaluation of the SERVQUAL Scales in a Retail
Setting, Advances in Consumer Research,
18, ed. HolmanR.H.SolomanM.G.,
Provo, Utah, Association for
Consumer Research,
483–489
21.
FishbeinM.
(1963), An Investigation of the Relationship
between Beliefs about an Object and the Attitude toward an
Object, Human Relations,
16, 8,
233–40
22.
GinterJ.
L. (1974),
An Experimental Investigation of Attitude Change and Choice
of a New Brand, Journal of Marketing
Research, 11, 1,
361–370
23.
HeelerR.
M.RayM.
L. (1972),
Measure Validation in Marketing,
Journal of Marketing Research, 9,
4, 361–370
24.
HolmbergU.NilssonG.MartensonR.OssianssonE.
(1991), Customers' Perception of Service in
Retailing, Proceedings, World Conference on
Research in the Distributive Trades, Den Haag,
60–67
25.
KoëlemeijerK.
(1991), Perceived Customer Service Quality: Issues on
Theory and Measurement, Proceedings, World
Conference on Research in the the Distributive Trades, Den Haag,
68–76
26.
LehmannD.
R. (1972),
Television Show Preference: Application of a choice
Model, Journal of Marketing Research,
8, 1,
47–55
27.
LehtinenU.LehtinenJ.
R. (1982), Service
Quality: A Study of Quality Dimensions, Unpublished working
paper, Helsinki, Finland OY:
Service Management Institute
28.
MazisM.
B.AtholaO.
T.KlippelR.
E. (1975),
A Comparison of Four Multi-Attribute Models in the Prediction
of Consumer Attitudes, Journal of Consumer
Research, 2, 1,
38–52
29.
McDougallG.LevesqueT.
(1992), The Measurement of Service Quality: Some
Methodology Issues, Séminaire International
de Recherche en Management des Activités de Service,
2, IAE Aix-en-Provence,
411–431
30.
NunnallyJ.
(1978), Psychometric Theory (2nd
ed.), Mac Graw-Hill Book
Company
31.
OliverR.
(1981), Measurement and Evaluations of
Satisfaction Process in Retail Settings, Journal of
Retailing, 57, 3,
25–48
32.
ParasuramanA.ZeithamlV.
A.BerryL.
L. (1985),
A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications
for Future Research, Journal of Marketing,
49, 3,
41–50
33.
ParasuramanA.ZeithamlV.
A.BerryL.
L. (1988),
SERVQUAL: A Multi-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer
Perceptions of Service Quality, Journal of
Retailing, 64, 1,
12–40
34.
ParasuramanA.BerryL.
L.ZeithamlV.
A. (1991),
Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL
Scale, Journal of Retailing,
67, 4,
420–450
35.
ParasuramanA.BerryL.
L.ZeithamlV.
A. (1993),
More on Improving Service Quality
Measurement, Journal of Retailing,
69, 1,
140–147
36.
ParasuramanA.ZeithamlV.
A.BerryL.
L. (1994),
Reassessment of Expectations as a Comparison Standard in
Measuring Service Quality: Implications for Further
Research, Journal of Marketing,
58, 1,
111–123
37.
PeterJ.
P. (1981),
Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing
Practices, Journal of Marketing Research,
18, 2,
133–145
38.
PeterJ.
P.ChurchillG.
A. (1986),
Relationship Among Research Design Choices and Psychometric
Properties of Rayting Scales: A Meta-Analysis,
Journal of Marketing Research, 23,
3, 1–10
39.
PrakashV.
(1984), Validity and Reliability of the
Confirmation of Expectations Paradigm as a Determinant of Consumer
Satisfaction, Journal of the Academy of Marketing
Science, 12, 4,
63–76
40.
ReichheldF.SasserW.
E. (1990),
Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services,
Harvard Business Review, 68,
4, 105–111
41.
SwanJ.
E.TrawickI.
F. (1980),
Satisfaction Related to Predictive vs Desired
Expectations, Refining Concepts and Measures of
Consumer Satisfaction and Complaining Behavior, ed. HuntH.K.DayR.L.,
Bloomington School of Business, Indiana
University,
7–12
42.
TeasR.
K. (1993),
Expectations, Performance Evaluation and Consumer's
Perceptions of Quality, Journal of
Marketing, 57, 4,
18–34
43.
TseD.
K.WilsonP.
C. (1988),
Models of Consumer Satisfaction Formation: An
Extension, Journal of Marketing Research,
25, 2,
204–212
44.
ZeithamlV.
A.ParasuramanA.BerryL.
L. (1990),
Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and
Expectations, New York,
The Free Press
45.
ZeithamlV.
A.BerryL.
L.ParasuramanA.
(1996), The Behavioral Consequences of Service
Quality, Journal of Marketing,
60, 2,
31–46
