L'objet de cet article est d'étudier les relations entre le concept de recherche de variété dans le choix du point de vente et le concept plus classique de tendance à l'exploration par le lèchevitrine. Une première partie précise la définition de chacun des concepts, la proposition et le test d'échelles de mesure étant présentés dans une deuxième partie. Les résultats obtenus confirment que ces deux concepts sont distincts, et montrent l'influence positive de la tendance à l'exploration par le lèchevitrine sur la recherche de variété dans le choix du point de vente.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmineA. (1990), «Contribution à l'étude des relations entre l'implication du consommateur et son activité de recherche d'information préalable à l'acte d'achat», thèse de doctorat en Sciences de gestion, Université de Paris I.
2.
AurierP. (1991), Recherche de variété: Un concept majeur de la théorie en marketing, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 6, 1, 85–106.
3.
BabinB. J.DardenW. R.GriffinM. (1994), Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value, Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 2, 644–656.
4.
BagozziR. P.WarshawP. R. (1990), Trying to consume, Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 3, 127–140.
5.
BlochP. H.RichinsM. L. (1983), Shopping without purchase: An investigation of consumer browsing behavior, in BagozziR.TyboutA. (Eds), Advances in Consumer Research, 10, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 389–393.
6.
BlochP. H.SherellD. L.RidgwayN. M. (1989), Extending the concept of shopping: An investigation of browsing activity, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 17, 4, 13–22.
7.
BlochP. H.RidgwayN. M.DawsonS. (1994), The shopping mall as consumer habitat, Journal of Retailing, 70, 1, 22–41.
8.
CalderB.PhillipsJ.TyboutA. (1980), The design, conduct and application of consumer research: Theory vs effects oriented studies, in Marketing in the eighties, eds Bagozzi et al., Chicago, A.M.A., 307–311.
9.
DillonW. R.GoldsteinM. (1984), Multivariate Analysis, Methods and applications, Wiley series in probabilities and mathematical statistics, North Holland.
10.
FulgoniG. M.EskinG. J. (1983), The behaviorscan research facility for studying retail shopping patterns, in Patronage behavior and retail management, W. R. Darden, R. F. Lusch, New York: North Holland, 269–275.
11.
GaulinLarocheMcDougallMasonMeyerEzell (1993) Les commerces de détail, Marketing et gestion, Gaetan Morin Editeur.
12.
GerbingD. W.AndersonJ. C. (1988), An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment, Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 2, 186–192.
HirschmanE. C. (1980), Innovativeness, novelty seeking and consumer creativity, Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 3, 283–295.
15.
HoyerW. D.RidgwayN. M. (1984), Variety seeking as an explanation for exploratory purchase behavior: A theoretical model, in KinnearT.C. (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, 11, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 114–119.
16.
JallaisJ.OrsoniJ.FadyA. (1994), Le Marketing dans le commerce de détail, Vuibert, Paris.
17.
JoreskogK. G.SorbomD. (1993), Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the Simplis Command Language, Lawrence Elbaum Associates Publishers, 111–131.
18.
KengA. K.EhrenbergA. S. C. (1984), Patterns of store choice, Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 4, 399–409.
19.
LaurentG. (1978), A study of multiple variant consumption for frequently purchased consumer products, unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachussets Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
20.
MidgleyD. F.DowlingG. R. (1978), Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement, Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 2, 229–242.
21.
McAlisterL.PessemierE. (1982), Variety seeking behavior: An interdisciplinary review, Journal of consumer Research, 9, 4, 311–321.
22.
PinsonC.JainA.MalhotraN. (1980), Identifying cognitive style determinants of retail patronage, Marketing into the eighties, Proceedings of the 1980 Annual Conference of the Market Research Society, Brighton, UK, 19–21 March, 358–379.
23.
RajuP. S. (1980), Optimum Stimulation Level: Its relationship to personality, demographics, and exploratory behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 4, 272–282.
24.
RajuP. S.VenkatesanM. (1980), Exploratory behavior in the consumer context: A state of the art review, in Advances in Consumer Research, 7, Association for Consumer Research, 258–263.
25.
ReynoldsF. D.DardenW. R.MartinW. S. (1974), Developing an image of the store loyal consumer, Journal of retailing, 50, 4, 73–84.
26.
RoehrichG. (1994), Innovativités hédoniste et sociale: Proposition d'une échelle de mesure, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 9, 2, 19–42.
27.
SteenkampJ.-B.BaumgartnerH. (1992), The role of optimum stimulation level in exploratory consumer behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 4, 434–448.
28.
SteenkampJ.-B.Van TrijpH. (1991), The use of Lisrel in validating marketing constructs, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8, 3, 283–299.
