La Russie a été choisie pour étudier le processus d'évolution des valeurs terminales et instrumentales. De cette étude, à caractère essentiellement exploratoire, deux observations se dégagent:
D'une part, la stabilité globale des systèmes de valeurs : la régression de certaines valeurs est compensée par la progression d'autres valeurs. Ceci pose la question de la pertinence des stratégies marketing, notamment « moyens-fins », fondées sur une unique valeur des consommateurs.
D'autre part, on observe une plus grande stabilité des valeurs instrumentales que des valeurs terminales; par suite, il semble que plus d'attention devrait être accordée aux valeurs instrumentales quand des stratégies durables de segmentation et de positionnement sont recherchées.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmineA.ForguesB. (1993), Vers une mesure de la désirabilité sociale dans les réponses aux questionnaires, in Actes de l'Association Française du Marketing, 9, 111–125.
2.
AndersonJ.C.GerbingD.W. (1988), Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103, 31, 411–23.
3.
AurifeilleJ.M. (1991), Contribution of Instrumental Values to Means-End Chain Analysis and to Advertising Conceptualization, Workshop on Value and Lifestyle Research in Marketing, Bruxelles: EIASM.
4.
AurifeilleJ.M. (1993a), La segmentation par les chaînes moyens-fins: Méthodologie et validité prédictive, in Actes de l'Association Française du Marketing, 9, 363–394.
5.
AurifeilleJ.M. (1993b), Une Procédure d'Affectation pour l'Aggrégation des Systèmes de Valeurs Individuels, Poitiers: IAE.
6.
BartlettM.S. (1950), Tests of Significance in Factor Analysis, The British Journal of Psychology, 77–85.
7.
BeattyS.E.HomerP.M.KahleL.R. (1988), Problems with VALS in International Marketing Research: An Example from an Application of the Empirical Mirror Technique, Advances in Consumer Research, 15, 375–80.
8.
BeattyS.E.KahleL.R.HomerP.M.MisraS. (1985), Alternative Measurement Approaches to Consumer Values: The List of Values and the Rokeach Value Survey, Psychology and Marketing, 181–200.
9.
BeckerB.W.ConnorP.E. (1981), Personal Values of the Heavy User of Mass Media, Journal of Advertising Research, 21, 37–43.
10.
BouffardL.LensW.NuttinJ.R. (1983), Extension de la Perspective Temporelle Future en Relation avec la Frustration, International Journal of Psychology, 18, 429–42.
11.
CattellR. B. (1966), The Scree Test for the Number of Factors, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 245–276.
12.
CrosbyL.A.BitnerM.J.GillJ.D. (1990), Organizational Structure of Values, Journal of Business Research, 20, 123–134.
13.
DeMaioT.J. (1984), Social Desirability and Survey Measurement: A Review, in Surveying Subjective PhenomenaTurnerC.F.MartinE. eds., New York: Russell Sage, 257–282.
14.
DillmanD.A. (1983), Mail and Other Self-administrated Questionnaires, in Handbook of Survey Research, RossiP. ed., Academic Press, 359–377.
15.
EisenhowerD.MathiowetzN.A.MorgensteinD. (1991), Recall Error: Sources and Bias Reduction Techniques, in Measurement Errors in Surveys, BiemerP., eds, New York: Wiley, 127–144.
16.
FeatherN.T.PeayE.R. (1975), The Structure of Terminal and Instrumental Values: Dimensions and Clusters, Australian Journal of Psychology, 151–164.
17.
GrunertS.C. (1991), Une recherche inter-culturelle sur les valeurs personnelles des consommateurs et quelques suggestions pour leur utilisation en publicité, in Actes de l'Association française du Marketing, 7, 75–78.
18.
GrunertS.C.JuhlH.J. (1991), Values, Environmental Attitudes and Buying of Organic Foods: Their Relationships in a Sample of Danish Teachers, Workshop on Value and Lifestyle Research in Marketing, Bruxelles: EIASM.
19.
InglehartR. (1985), Aggregate Stability and Individual-Level Flux in Mass Belief Systems: The Level of Analysis Paradox, American Political Science Review, 79, 97–116.
20.
HowardJ.A. (1977), Consumer Behavior: Application of Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
KahleL.R. (1983), Social Values and Social Change: Adaptation to Life in America, ed. KahleL.R., New York: Praeger.
23.
KahleL.R.TimmerS. (1983), A Theory and Method for Studying Values, in Social Values and Social Change: Adaptation to Life in America, ed. KahleL.R., New York: Praeger, 43–69.
24.
KahleL.R.PoulosB.SukhdialA. (1988), Changes in Social Values in the United States during the Past Decade, Journal of Advertising Research, 28, 35–41.
25.
KaiserH.F. (1970), A Second Generation Little Jiffy, Psychometrika, 401–415.
26.
KamakuraW.A.MazzonJ.A. (1991), Value Segmentation: A Model for the Measurement of Values and Value Systems, Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 2, 208–18.
27.
KapfererJ.N.LaurentG. (1983), La sensibilité aux marques, Paris: Jours de France.
28.
KluckhohnC. (1951), Values and Value-Orientations in the Theory of Action, in Toward a General Theory of Action, eds. ParsonsT.ShilsE.A., Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 388–433.
29.
KoG.GentryJ.W. (1991). The Development of Time Orientation Measures for Use in Cross-Cultural Research, Advances in Consumer Research, 18, 135–142.
30.
LaskeyH.A. (1991), Measurement Issues in Cross-Cultural Values Research, Workshop on Value and Lifestyle Research in Marketing, Brussels: EIASM.
31.
LybergL.KasprzykD. (1991), Data Collection Methods and Measurement Error: An Overview, in Measurement Errors in Surveys, BiemerP.Al, eds., New York: Wiley, 237–257.
32.
MarcotorchinoMichaud (1979), Optimisation en Analyse Ordinale des Données, Paris: Masson.
33.
MaslowA.H. (1954), Motivation and Personality, New York: Harper.
34.
MullerT.E.KahleL.R. (1991), Analyzing Long-Term Changes in Consumer Values: The Case of North America's Aging Baby Boomers, Worshop on Value and Lifestyle Research in Marketing, Bruxelles: EIASM.
35.
MunsonJ.M.McQuarrieE.F. (1988), Shortening the Rokeach Value Survey for Use in Consumer Research, Advances in Consumer Research, 15, 381–6.
36.
ReynoldsT.J.CraddockA.B. (1988), The Application of the Meccas Model to the Development and Assessment of Advertising Strategy: A Case Study, Journal of Advertising Research, 28, 1, 43–54.
37.
ReynoldsT.J.GutmanJ. (1988), Laddering Theory, Method Analysis and Interpretation, Journal of Advertising research, 28, 1, 11–31.
38.
RokeachM. J. (1960), The Open and Closed Mind, New York: Basic Books.
39.
RokeachM.J. (1973), The Nature of Human Values, New York: Free Press.
40.
RokeachM.J.Ball-RokeachS.J., (1989), Stability and Change in American Value Priorities, 1968–1981, American Psychologist, 44, 775–784.
41.
SchwartzS. (1991), Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advance and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries, In: ZannaM. (ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, Academic Press.
42.
SchwartzS.BilskyW. (1990), Toward a Theory of Universal Content and Structure of Values: Extensions and Cross-Cultural Replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 5, 878–891.
43.
TriandisH.C. (1972), The Analysis of Subjective Culture, New York: Wiley and Sons.
44.
UsunierJ-C.Valette-FlorenceP.FalcyS. (1992), Systèmes de valeurs et styles de temps: Une approche exploratoire de leur complémentarité, in Actes de l'Association Française du Marketing, 8, 271–294. Lyon: AFM.
45.
Valette-FlorenceP. (1988), Analyse structurelle comparative des composantes des systèmes de valeurs selon Kahle et Rokeach, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 3, 1, 15–34.
46.
Valette-FlorenceP.GrunertS.C.GrunertK.G.BeattyS. (1991), Une comparaison franco-allemande de l'adhésion aux valeurs personnelles, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 6, 3, 5–20.
47.
Valette-FlorenceP.AurifeilleJ.M.RapacchiB. (1993), Apport d'un modèle d'équations structurelles à l'analyse des chaînages cognitifs, in Actes de l'Association Française du Marketing, 9, 85–108.
48.
VinsonD.MunsonJ.NakanishiM. (1977), An Investigation of the Rokeach Value Survey for Consumer Research Application, Advances in Consumer Research, 5, 247–252.
49.
WilliamsR.M. (1968), Values, in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, ed. SillsE., New York: MacMillan, 203–207.
50.
YankelovichD. (1981), New Rules Searching for Self-Fulfillment in a World Turned Upside Down.New York: Bantam.
51.
ZinkhanG.M.HongJ.W.LawsonR. (1990), Achievement and Affiliation Motivation, Journal of Business Research, 20, 2, 135–143.
