AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 179–211.
2.
AjzenI (2011) The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health26(9): 1113–1127.
3.
AmireaultSGodinGVohlMCPérusseL (2008) Moderators of the intention-behaviour and perceived behavioural control-behaviour relationships for leisure-time physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity5(1): 1–11.
4.
BagozziRPYiY (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science16: 74–94.
5.
BaileyJPenaMTudorT (2015) Strategies for improving recycling at a higher education institution: a case study of the University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados. The Open Waste Management Journal8(1): 1–11.
6.
BambergSMöserG (2007) Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of proenvironmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology27(1): 14–25.
7.
BarghJAChenMBurrowsL (1996) Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71(2): 230–244.
8.
BarrS (2007) Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: a U.K. case study of household waste management. Environment and Behavior39(4): 435–473.
9.
BarrSShawGColesTPrillwitzJ (2010) “A holiday is a holiday”: practicing sustainability, home and away. Journal of Transport Geography18(3): 474–481.
10.
BatesonMNettleDRobertsG (2006) Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters2(3): 412–414.
11.
BaumeisterRFStillwellAMHeathertonTF (1994) Guilt: an interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin115(2): 243–267.
12.
BenjaminiYHochbergY (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological)57(1): 289–300.
13.
BerlinNGueyeMMonjonS (2025) Feedback and cooperation: an experiment in sorting behavior. Ecological Economics230: 108505.
14.
BotetzagiasIDimaAFMalesiosC (2015) Extending the theory of planned behavior in the context of recycling: the role of moral norms and of demographic predictors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling95: 58–67.
15.
BrooksR (2007) Friends, peers and higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education28(6): 693–707.
16.
CarrusGPassafaroPBonnesM (2008) Emotions, habits and rational choices in ecological behaviours: the case of recycling and use of public transportation. Journal of Environmental Psychology28(1): 51–62.
17.
ChanLBishopB (2013) A moral basis for recycling: extending the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology36: 96–102.
18.
ChenMFTungPJ (2010) The moderating effect of perceived lack of facilities on consumers’ recycling intentions. Environment and Behavior42(6): 824–844.
19.
ChinWW (1998) Commentary: issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly22(1): vii–xvi.
20.
ChinWWDibbernJ (2009) A permutation based procedure for multi-group PLS analysis: results of tests of differences on simulated data and a cross of information system services between Germany and the USA. In: VinziVEChinWWHenselerJWangH. (éds) Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications in Marketing and Related Fields. Berlin: Springer, 171–193.
21.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2ème éditon. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
22.
ConnerMArmitageCJ (1998) Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology28(15): 1429–1464.
23.
De YoungR (1989) Exploring the difference between recyclers and non-recyclers: the role of information. Journal of Environmental Issues18(4): 341–351.
ElgaaiedL (2012) Exploring the role of anticipated guilt on pro-environmental behavior–a suggested typology of residents in France based on their recycling patterns. Journal of Consumer Marketing29(5): 369–377.
27.
ErgunAKulkulC (2019) Defining semi-public space: a case study in the gated communities of Yaşamkent, Ankara. Turkish Studies20(5): 776–793.
28.
ErtzMHuangRJoMSKarakasFSarigöllüE (2017) From single-use to multi-use: study of consumers’ behavior toward consumption of reusable containers. Journal of Environmental Management193: 334–344.
FeiginSOwensGGoodyear-SmithF (2014) Theories of human altruism: a systematic review. Annals of Neuroscience and Psychology1(1): 1–9.
31.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
32.
FranceyDBergmüllerR (2012) Images of eyes enhance investments in a real-life public good. PLoS One7(5): e37397.
33.
GefenDStraubD (2005) A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems16(1): 5.
34.
GeigerJLStegLVan Der WerffEÜnalAB (2019) A meta-analysis of factors related to recycling. Journal of Environmental Psychology64: 78–97.
35.
GeigerJLvan der WerffEÜnalABStegL (2022) Context matters: the role of perceived ease and feasibility vis-à-vis biospheric values in recycling behaviour. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances16: 200122.
36.
GirardonKGabrielPDupréM (2022) Incitation au tri des déchets: expérimentation de signalisations sur point d’apport volontaire. Décisions Marketing1: 111–131.
37.
GohEEsfandiarKJieFBrownKDjajadikertaH. (2022) Please sort out your rubbish! An integrated structural model approach to examine antecedents of residential households’ waste separation behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production35: 131789.
38.
GrassiasJD (2025) Dis-moi où tu habites, je te dirai si tu tries ! Le rôle du contexte résidentiel pour expliquer le tri des foyers. Thèse de doctorat: Université de Bretagne-Sud.
39.
HairJFHultGTMRingleCMSarstedtM (2022) A Primer on Partial Least Square Equation Modelling (PSL-SEM), 53ème édition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
HollandRWAartsHLangendamD (2006) Breaking and creating habits on the working floor: a field-experiment on the power of implementation intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology42(6): 776–783.
41.
HornikJCherianJMadanskyMNarayanaC (1995) Determinants of recycling behavior: a synthesis of research results. Journal of Socio-Economics24(1): 105–127.
42.
HurstKFSintovND (2022) Guilt consistently motivates pro-environmental outcomes while pride depends on context. Journal of Environmental Psychology80: 101776.
43.
IslamMTDiasPHudaN (2021) Young consumers’ e-waste awareness, consumption, disposal, and recycling behavior: a case study of university students in Sydney, Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production282: 124490.
44.
JöreskogKG (1971) Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika36(2): 109–133.
45.
KahnemanD (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. Londres: Macmillan.
46.
KazaSYaoLBhada-TataPVan WoerdenF (2018) What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. Washington DC: World Bank Publications.
47.
KellyTCMasonIGLeissMWGaneshS (2006) University community responses to on-campus resource recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling47(1): 42–55.
48.
KnickmeyerD (2020) Social factors influencing household waste separation: a literature review on good practices to improve the recycling performance of urban areas. Journal of Cleaner Production245: 118605.
49.
KnussenCYuleF (2008) “I’m not in the habit of recycling”: the role of habitual behavior in the disposal of household waste. Environment and Behavior40(5): 683–702.
50.
KnussenCYuleFMacKenzieJWellsM (2004) An analysis of intentions to recycle household waste: the roles of past behaviour, perceived habit, and perceived lack of facilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology24(2): 237–246.
51.
KormosCGiffordR (2014) The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology40: 359–371.
52.
KraftPRiseJSuttonSRøysambE (2005) Perceived difficulty in the theory of planned behaviour: perceived behavioural control or affective attitude?British Journal of Social Psychology44(3): 479–496.
53.
KronrodAGrinsteinAWathieuL (2012) Go green! Should environmental messages be so assertive?Journal of Marketing76(1): 95–102.
54.
LakshmiGNguyenKMazhikeyevAHack-PolayDAnafiyayevaZ (2022) Nudging student recycling behaviour: an experimental study in Kazakhstan and UK higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production377: 134164.
55.
LeeYJDe YoungRMaransRW (1995) Factors influencing individual recycling behavior in office settings: a study of office workers in Taiwan. Environment and Behavior27(3): 380–403.
56.
LinZYWangXLiCJGordonMPHarderMK (2016) Visual prompts or volunteer models: an experiment in recycling. Sustainability8(5): 458.
57.
LittlefordCRyleyTFirthS (2014) Context, control and the spillover of energy use behaviours between office and home settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology40: 157–166.
58.
LoSHPetersGJYKokG (2012) Energy-related behaviors in office buildings: a qualitative study on individual and organizational determinants. Applied Psychology61(2): 227–249.
59.
MannettiLPierroALiviS (2004) Recycling: planned and self-expressive behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology24(2): 227–236.
60.
MansteadASR (2000) The role of moral norm in the attitude-behavior relation. In: TerryDJHoggMA (éds), Attitudes, Behavior, and Social Context. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 11–30.
61.
MatiiukYLiobikienèG (2021) The impact of informational, social, convenience and financial tools on waste sorting behavior: assumptions and reflections of the real situation. Journal of Environmental Management297: 113–119.
62.
MonnotEReniouFRouquetA (2014) Recycling household waste: a classification of the logistics used by consumers. Recherche et Applications en Marketing29(3): 75–97.
63.
ÖlanderFThøgersenJ (1995) Understanding of consumer behaviour as a prerequisite for environmental protection. Journal of Consumer Policy18(4): 345–385.
64.
OnwezenMCAntonidesGBartelsJ (2013) The Norm Activation Model: an exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology39: 141–153.
65.
ParguelBFraccaroAMacéS (2022) Compromise pricing in luxury. Journal of Product and Brand Management31(3): 506–517.
66.
ParkinsonBIllingworthS (2009) Guilt in response to blame from others. Cognition and Emotion23(8): 1589–1614.
67.
PeiZ (2019) Roles of neighborhood ties, community attachment and local identity in residents’ household waste recycling intention. Journal of Cleaner Production241: 118217.
68.
PelozaJWhiteKShangJ (2013) Good and guilt-free: the role of self-accountability in influencing preferences for products with ethical attributes. Journal of Marketing77(1): 104–119.
69.
ReniouFRobert-MonnotEParguelBMonjonS (2026) Inconsistency in waste-sorting behavior: Place matters!. Décisions Marketing, forthcoming.
70.
SchultzPWOskampSMainieriT (1995) Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors. Journal of Environmental Psychology15(2): 105–121.
71.
SchwartzSH (1977) Normative influences on altruism. In: BerkowitzL (éd.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 10. Academic Press, 221–279.
72.
SetiawanBAfiffAZHeruwastoI (2020) Integrating the theory of planned behavior with norm activation in a pro-environmental context. Social Marketing Quarterly26(3): 244–258.
73.
ShenWXiaoWWangX (2016) Passenger satisfaction evaluation model for Urban rail transit: a structural equation modeling based on partial least squares. Transport Policy46: 20–31.
74.
SmithAMO’SullivanT (2012) Environmentally responsible behaviour in the workplace: an internal social marketing approach. Journal of Marketing Management28(3/4): 469–493.
75.
StegLde GrootJ (2019) Environmental Psychology: An Introduction. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
76.
StegLVlekC (2009) Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology29(3): 309–317.
77.
SternP (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues56(3): 407–424.
78.
ThøgersenJ (2006) Norms for environmentally responsible behaviour: an extended taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology26(4): 247–261.
79.
TimlettRWilliamsID (2011) The ISB model (infrastructure, service, behaviour): a tool for waste practitioners. Waste Management31(6): 1381–1392.
80.
TudorTBarrSGilgA (2007) A tale of two locational settings: is there a link between pro-environmental behaviour at work and at home?Local Environment12(4): 409–421.
81.
TudorTLBarrSWGilgAW (2008) A novel conceptual framework for examining environmental behavior in large organizations: a case study of the Cornwall National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom. Environment and Behavior40(3): 426–450.
82.
VarottoASpagnolliA (2017) Psychological strategies to promote household recycling. A systematic review with meta-analysis of validated field interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology51: 168–188.
83.
VenkateshVBalaH (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences39(2): 273–315.
84.
WangJNketiahECaiXObuobiBAdu-GyamfiGAdjeiM (2023) What establishes citizens’ household intention and behavior regarding municipal solid waste separation? A case study in Jiangsu province. Journal of Cleaner Production423: 138642.
85.
WangJWuL (2016) The impact of emotions on the intention of sustainable consumption choices: evidence from a big city in an emerging country. Journal of Cleaner Production126: 325–336.
86.
WhitmarshLEHaggarPThomasM (2018) Waste reduction behaviors at home, at work, and on holiday: what influences behavioral consistency across contexts?Frontiers in Psychology9: 2447.
87.
YurievABoiralOFrancœurVPailléP (2018) Overcoming the barriers to pro-environmental behaviors in the workplace: a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production182: 379–394.
88.
YurievADahmenMPailléPBoiralOGuillaumieL (2020) Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: a scoping review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling155: 104660.
89.
ZhangBLaiKHWangBWangZ (2019) From intention to action: how do personal attitudes, facilities accessibility, and government stimulus matter for household waste sorting?Journal of Environmental Management233: 447–458.