AakkoMNiinimäkiK (2021) Quality matters: reviewing the connections between perceived quality and clothing use time. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management26(1): 107–125.
2.
AbricJ-C (2003) L’étude expérimentale des représentations sociales. In: JodeletD (éd.) Les représentations sociales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
3.
AchabouMADekhiliS (2013) Luxury and sustainable development: Is there a match?Journal of Business Research66(10): 1896–1903.
4.
AchabouMADekhiliSCondiniAP (2020) Consumer preferences towards animal-friendly fashion products: an application to the Italian market. Journal of Consumer Marketing37(6): 661–673.
5.
AchabouMA (2021) Utilisation des matériaux d’origine animale dans le luxe : point de vue des consommateurs et des professionnels. Decisions Marketing103(3): 107–133.
6.
AchrolRKotlerP (2011) Frontiers of the marketing paradigm in the third millennium. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science40: 35–52.
ArmstrongCKarellEKujalaSLangCNiinimäkiK (2015) Sustainable product-service systems for clothing: exploring consumer perceptions of consumption alternatives in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production97: 30–39.
10.
AyediMKammounM (2019) L’effet de la conscience écologique et des valeurs environnementales sur l’attitude à l’égard des produits écologiques d’entretien : Etude longitudinale. Gestion 200036(4): 87–115.
11.
BahlSBoesen-MarianiSChanSChoY-NChuganiSDorseyJGrierSGouldSMickDMilneGMurdockMRossSSchindlerR (2016) Mindfulness: its transformative potential for consumer, societal, and environmental well-being. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing35(2): 198–210.
12.
Balas-ChanelA (2002) L’Entretien d’explicitation. Accompagner l’apprenant vers la métacognition explicite. Recherches & Education1(2): 40–51.
13.
BardinL (2013) L’analyse de contenu. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
14.
BlanchetV (2017) ‘We make markets’: The role of the Ethical Fashion Show in categorising the ethical fashion. Recherche et Applications en Marketing32(2): 27–47.
BlySGwozdzWReischLA (2015) Exit from the high street: an exploratory study of sustainable fashion consumption pioneers: Sustainable fashion consumption pioneers study. International Journal of Consumer Studies39(2): 125–135.
17.
BoströmMMichelettiM (2016) Introducing the sustainability challenge of textiles and clothing. Journal of Consumer Policy39(4): 367–375.
18.
CareyLCervellonMC (2014) Ethical fashion dimensions: pictorial and auditory depictions through three cultural perspectives. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management18(4): 483–506.
19.
CartonGParigotJ (2022) Disappearing natural resources: what flowers tell us about new value chains. Journal of Business Strategy43(4): 222–228.
20.
CervellonMCWernerfeltAS (2012) Knowledge sharing among green fashion communities online. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: 16(2): 176–192.
21.
ChoiY-HKyu-HyeL (2021) Ethical consumers’ awareness of vegan materials: focused on fake fur and fake leather. Sustainability13(1): 436.
22.
CiaunicaA (2017) Qu’est-ce que la conscience?Paris: Vrin.
ChandyRKJoharGVMoormanCRobertsJH (2021) Better marketing for a better world. Journal of Marketing85(3): 1–9.
25.
Commission Européenne (2022) Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions: EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles. Disponible en ligne: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52022DC0141 [Consulté le 1er avril 2022].
26.
ConnellKYH (2011) Exploring consumers’ perceptions of eco-conscious apparel acquisition behaviors. Social Responsibility Journal7(1): 61–73.
27.
ConnellKYHKozarJM (2014) Environmentally sustainable clothing consumption: knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. In: MuthuSS (éd.) Roadmap to Sustainable Textiles and Clothing: Environmental and Social Aspects of Textiles and Clothing Supply Chain. Singapore: Springer, 41–61.
28.
Connor-CrabbARigbyE (2019) Garment quality and sustainability: a user-based approach. Fashion Practice11(3): 346–374.
29.
CwernerS (2001) Clothes at rest: elements for a sociology of the wardrobe. Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body & Culture5(1): 79–92.
30.
DamasioA (1999) Le Sentiment même de soi: Corps, émotions, conscience. Paris: Odile Jacob.
31.
DamasioA (2021) Sentir et Savoir, Une Nouvelle Théorie de La Conscience. Paris: Odile Jacob.
32.
DartiguepeyrouC (2010) Prospective culturelle de nos sociétés. In: DartiguepeyrouC (éd.) Prospective d’un monde en mutation. Paris: L’Harmattan, 97–120.
33.
de LamballerieEGuillardVDekhiliSCondaminE (à paraitre) Cas Fairly Made. Communiquer sur la traçabilité et l’impact environnemental et social dans l’industrie de la mode. In : DekhiliSReniouF (ed.) Cas en marketing durable. Une vision renouvelée des approches et pratiques en marketing. Caen : Editions EMS.
34.
DekhiliSAchabouMA (2016) Luxe et développement durable : quelles sources de dissonance ?Decisions Marketing83: 97–121.
35.
DekhiliSAchabouMAAlharbiF (2019) Could sustainability improve the promotion of luxury products?European Business Review31(4): 488–511.
36.
DekhiliSMerleAOchsA (2021) Marketing durable. Paris: Pearson France.
37.
DeprazN (2001) La Conscience : Approches croisées, des classiques aux sciences cognitives. Paris: Armand Colin.
38.
DeprazN (2014) Attention et vigilance ; à la croisée de la phénomenologie et des sciences cognitives. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
39.
DiamantopoulosABohlenGMSinkovicsRRBBSchlegelmilch (2003) Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research56(6):465–480.
40.
EyH (1963) La conscience. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
FerreiroE (2001) On the links between equilibration, causality and ‘prise de conscience’ in Piaget’s theory. Human Development44(4): 214–219.
43.
FletcherK (2012) Durability, fashion, sustainability: the processes and practices of use. Fashion Practice: The Journal of Design, Creative Process & the Fashion4(2): 221–238.
44.
FletcherK IKleppM (éds) (2017) Opening up the Wardrobe. Bollington: Novus.
45.
FreireP (1974) Education for Critical Consciousness. New York: Seabury Press.
46.
GardettiM (2017) Sustainability in the textile and fashion industries: animal ethics and welfare. In: Muthu SSTextiles and Clothing Sustainability: Implications in Textiles and Fashion. New York: Springer.
47.
GatéJ-P (2004) A la rencontre des pratiques d’apprentissage. Réflexions à propos d’un modèle d’entretien de recherche à visée métacognitive. Recherches & éducations Disponible en ligne: https://doi.org/10.4000/rechercheseducations.347 [consulté le 21 mars 2023].
48.
GicquelI (2011) Relations entre le système de consommation et les comportements en magasin : une approche par la valeur. Application au vêtement. Thèse de doctorat en Sciences de Gestion: IAE Dijon, France.
49.
GorgeHÖzçağlar-ToulouseNToussaintS (2014) Bien-être and well-being in consumer research: A comparative analysis. Recherche et Applications en Marketing30(2): 104–123.
50.
GuillardV (2018) Anticonsumption consciousness in pursuit of sustainability. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing37(2): 274–290.
51.
GuillardV (2021) Comment consommer avec sobriété. Paris: De Boek Supérieur.
52.
GwiltARissanenT (éds) (2011) Shaping Sustainable Fashion. Changing the Way We Make and Use Clothes. London: Earthscan from Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
53.
HaugABuschJ (2015) Towards an ethical fashion framework. Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body & Culture20:1–23.
54.
HenningerCAlevizouPOatesJ (2016) What is sustainable fashion?Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management20(4): 400–416.
55.
HenningsNBehrensSKlarmannCWiedmannK (2013) Sustainability as part of the luxury essence: delivering value through social and environmental excellence. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship52: 25–35.
56.
HinesJDO’NealGS (1995) Underlying determinants of clothing quality: the consumers’ perspective. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal13(3) 227–233.
57.
HinesJDSwinkerME (2001) Knowledge: a variable in evaluating clothing quality. International Journal of Consumer Studies25(1): 72–76.
58.
IngoldT (2007) Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues14(2): 1–16.
59.
JacobyJHaddockROlsonJ (1971) Price, brand name, and product composition characteristics as determinants of perceived quality. Journal of Applied Psychology. 55(6): 570–579.
60.
JägelTGruberTKeelingKReppelA (2012) Individual values and motivational complexities in ethical clothing consumption: ameans-end approach. Journal of Marketing Management28(3–4): 373–396.
61.
JoergensC (2006) Ethical fashion: myth or future trend?Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management10(3): 360–371.
62.
KarellENiinimäkiK (2019) Addressing the dialogue between design, sorting and recycling in a circular economy. Design Journal22(1): 997–1013.
63.
KemperJBallantineP (2019) What do we mean by sustainability marketing?Journal of Marketing Management35(3)4): 1–33.
64.
KimHDamhorstML (1998) Environmental concern and apparel consumption. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal16(3): 126–133.
65.
KimHChooHJYoonN (2013) The motivational drivers of fast fashion avoidance. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management17(2) 243–260.
66.
KleppIGBjerckM (2014) A methodological approach to the materiality of clothing: wardrobe studies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology17(4): 373–386.
67.
LaitalaK (2014) Consumers’ clothing disposal behaviour – a synthesis of research results: clothing disposal behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies38(5): 444–457.
MarleauME (2009) Des liens à tisser entre la prise de conscience et l’action environnementales. Éducation et francophonie37(2): 11–32.
72.
MartinDSchoutenJ (2014) The answer is sustainable marketing, when the question is: what can we do?Recherche et Applications en Marketing29(3): 107–109.
73.
McCracken (1988) The Long Interview. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
74.
McDonaghPDobschaSProtheroA (2011) Sustainable consumption and production challenges for transformative consumer research. In: Glen MickDPettigrewSPechmannCOzanneJ (éds) Transformative Consumer Research for Personal and Collective Well-Being. New York: Routledge, 267–282.
75.
McNeillLMooreR (2015) Sustainable fashion consumption and the fast fashion conundrum: fashionable consumers and attitudes to sustainability in clothing choice. International Journal of Consumer Studies39(3): 212–222.
76.
MilesMBHubermanAMSaldañaJ (2013) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook and The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
77.
MickDOzanneJPechmannCPettigrewS (2012) Transformative Consumer Research for Personal and Collective Well-being. New York: Routledge.
78.
MukendiADaviesIGlozerSMcDonaghP (2020) Sustainable fashion: current and future research directions. European Journal of Marketing54(11): 2873–2909.
79.
NagelT (1974) What is it like to be a bat?Philosophical Review83: 435–50.
80.
NiinimäkiK (2010) Eco-clothing, consumer identity and ideology. Sustainable Development18(3): 150–162.
81.
NiinimäkiKArmstrongC (2013) From pleasure in use to preservation of meaningful memories: a closer look at the sustainability of clothing via longevity and attachment. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education6(3): 190–199.
82.
NiinimäkiKDahlboHGwiltAPetersGPerryPRissanenT (2020) The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment1(4): 189–200.
83.
PaçoALealFAvilaLDennisK (2021) Fostering sustainable consumer behavior regarding clothing: assessing trends on purchases, recycling and disposal. Textile Research Journal. 91(3–4): 373–384.
84.
Papetti TisseronYTisseronS (1987) L’érotisme du toucher des étoffes. Paris: Editions Séguier.
85.
PetersGLenzenMLiM (2021) The need to decelerate fast fashion in a hot climate – A global sustainability perspective on the garment industry. Journal of Cleaner Production295: 126390.
86.
PiagetJ (1967) La conscience. In: AlexandreP (éd.) L’aventure humaine: encyclopédie des sciences de l’homme, vol. 5: l’homme à la découverte de lui-même. Genève: Kister; Paris: La Grange Batelière, 48–52.
87.
PiagetJ (1974) La prise de conscience. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France.
88.
PointSVoynnet FourboulS (2006) Le codage à visée théorique. Recherche et Applications en Marketing21(4): 61–78.
89.
PollioHRHenleyTThompsonCB (1997) The Phenomenology of Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
90.
PolonskyMJ (2011) Transformative green marketing: impediments and opportunities. Journal of Business Research64(12): 1311–1319.
91.
PookulangaraSShephardA (2013) Slow fashion movement: understanding consumer perceptions—an exploratory study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services20(2): 200–206.
92.
ProtheroAMcDonaghP (2014) Sustainability marketing research: past, present and future. Journal of Marketing Management30(11–12): 1186–1219.
93.
ProtheroADobschaSFreundJKilbourneWLuchsMOzanneLThøgersenJ (2011) Sustainable consumption: opportunities for consumer research and public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing30(1): 31–38.
94.
ReimersVChaoFMagnusonB (2016) The academic conceptualisation of ethical clothing: could it account for the attitude behaviour gap?Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management20(4): 383–399.
95.
RestivoLApostolidisTRebeccan-ReynierC (2018) Pratiquer l’analyse interprétative phénoménologique : intérêts et illustration dans le cadre de l’enquête psychosociale par entretiens de recherche. Pratiques Psychologiques (24)4: 427–449.
RuyerR (1963) Les rapports de la science et de la philosophie et l’étroitesse de la conscience. Revue internationale de Philosophie17(64-2): 141–154.
98.
SandinGPetersGRoosSSpakBZamaniB (2019) Environmental Assessment of Swedish Clothing Consumption - Six Garments, Sustainable Futures. Mistra Future Fashion, Report no. 5. Göteborg, Sweden.
99.
SimonnotB (2006). Le besoin d’information: principes et compétences. In: Thémat’IC 2006, Information: besoins et usages. Strasbourg, IUT Robert Schuman, 17mars2006.
100.
SmithJ (2011) Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review5(1): 9–27.
101.
StoneGBarnesJHMontgomeryC (1995) Ecoscale: ascale for the measurement of environmentally responsible consumers. Psychology & Marketing12(7): 595–612.
102.
SunJJBellezzaSPahariaN (2021) Buy less, buy luxury: understanding and overcoming product durability neglect for sustainable consumption. Journal of Marketing85(3): 28–43.
103.
SwinkerMEHinesJD (2006) Understanding consumers’ perception of clothing quality: a multidimensional approach. International Journal of Consumer Studies30(2): 218–223.
TheureauJ (2010) Les entretiens d’autoconfrontation et de remise en situation par les traces matérielles et le programme de recherche « cours d’action ». Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances4(4–2): 287–322.
106.
TisseronS (2016) Un objet qui colle à la peau, le vêtement. In: TisseronS (éd.) Comment l’esprit vient aux objets. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 27–47.
107.
TrembleySd’AlmeidaNLibaertT (éds) (2018) Développement durable. Une communication qui se démarque. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
108.
VermerschP (1994) L’entretien d’explicitation en formation initiale et en formation continue. Paris: ESF.
109.
VygotskiL (2003) Conscience, inconscient, émotions. Paris: La dispute.
110.
WegnerMHeinzelT (2020) Human perceptions of recycled textiles and circular fashion: a systematic literature review. Sustainability12: 10599.
111.
WoodsideAG. (2012) Economic psychology and fashion marketing theory appraising Veblen’s theory of conspicuous consumption. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing3(2): 55–60.