AcarOA (2018) Harnessing the creative potential of consumers: money, participation, and creativity in idea crowdsourcing. Marketing Letters29(2): 177–188.
2.
AcarOA (2019) Motivations and solution appropriateness in crowdsourcing challenges for innovation. Research Policy48(8): 103716–103716.
3.
AfuahATucciCL (2012) Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management Review37(3): 355–375.
4.
AllenBJChandrasekaranDBasuroyS (2018) Design crowdsourcing: the impact on new product performance of sourcing design solutions from the “crowd”. Journal of Marketing82(2): 106–123.
5.
AuhSMengucBKatsikeasCSJungYS (2019) When does customer participation matter? An empirical investigation of the role of customer empowerment in the customer participation–performance link. Journal of Marketing Research56(6): 1012–1033.
6.
AartsHGollwitzerPMHassinRR (2004) Goal contagion: perceiving is for pursuing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology87(1): 23–37.
7.
BachoucheHSabriO (2019) Empowerment in marketing: synthesis, critical review, and agenda for future research. AMS Review9(3): 304–323.
8.
BelkRWFischerEKozinetsRV (2013) Qualitative Consumer and Marketing Research. Londres: SAGE.
9.
BournoisFPointSFourboulC (2002) L’analyse des données qualitatives assistée par ordinateur. Revue Française de Gestion28: 71–84.
10.
BrdarIRijavecMMiljkovićD (2009) Life goals and well-being: are extrinsic aspirations always detrimental to well-being?Psihologijske teme18(2): 317–334.
11.
CappaFOrianiRPinelliMetdeMassisA (2019) When does crowdsourcing benefit firm stock market performance?Research Policy48(9): 103825.
12.
ChaudhuriA (1999) Does brand loyalty mediate brand equity outcomes?Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice7(2): 136–146.
13.
ChenLXuPLiuD (2020) Effect of crowd voting on participation in crowdsourcing
14.
CrittendenKS (1983) Sociological aspects of attribution. Annual Review of Sociology9: 425–446.
15.
DahlDWFuchsCSchreierM (2015) Why and when consumers prefer products of user-driven firms: a social identification account. Management Science61(8): 1978–1988.
16.
DahlDWMoreauCP (2007) Thinking inside the box: why consumers enjoy constrained creative experiences. Journal of Marketing Research44(3): 357–369.
17.
DikGAartsH (2007) Behavioral cues to others’ motivation and goal pursuits: the perception of effort facilitates goal inference and contagion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology43(5): 727–737.
18.
DionD (2008) A la recherche du Consommateur. Nouvelles techniques pour mieux comprendre le client. Paris: Dunod.
19.
DjelassiSDecoopmanI (2013) Customers’ participation in product development through crowdsourcing: issues and implications. Industrial Marketing Management42(5): 683–692.
20.
EtgarM (2008) A descriptive model of the consumer co-production process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science36(1): 97–108.
21.
FrankeNShahS (2003) How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy32(1): 157–178.
22.
FreyKLüthjeCHaagS (2011) Whom should firms attract to open innovation platforms? The role of knowledge diversity and motivation. Long Range Planning44(5/6): 397–420.
23.
FuchsCPrandelliESchreierM (2010) The psychological effects of empowerment strategies on consumer’s product demand. Journal of Marketing74(1): 65–79.
24.
FuchsCPrandelliESchreierMDahlDW (2013) All that is users might not be gold: how labeling products as user designed backfires in the context of luxury fashion brands. Journal of Marketing77(5): 75–91.
25.
FuchsCSchreierM (2011) Customer empowerment in new product development*. Journal of Product Innovation Management28(1): 17–32.
26.
FaullantRHolzmannPSchwarzEJ (2016) Everybody is invited but not everybody will come — the influence of personality dispositions on users’ entry decisions for crowdsourcing competitions. International Journal of Innovation Management20(06): 1–20.
27.
GirotraKTerwieschCUlrichKT (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Science56(4): 591–605.
28.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
29.
GuptaSVajicM (2000) The contextual and dialectical nature of experiences. In: FitzsimmonsJFitzsimmonsM (éds) New Service Development. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 33–51.
30.
Hamdi-KidarLKeinzPLe NagardEVernetteE (2019) Comparing lead users to emergent-nature consumers as sources of innovation at early stages of new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management36: 616–631.
31.
HastariRAdelaZAlkhairHWibowoI (2020) Direct and indirect effects of operant resources on co-creation experience: empirical evidence from Airbnb consumers. Business: Theory & Practice21(1): 92–103.
32.
HoffmanDLKopallePKNovakTP (2010) The “right” consumers for better concepts: identifying consumers high in emergent nature to develop new product concepts. Journal of Marketing Research47(5): 854–865.
33.
HofstedeG (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
34.
HofstetterRZhangJZHerrmannA (2018) Successive open innovation contests and incentives: winner-take-all or multiple prizes?Journal of Product Innovation Management35(4): 492–517.
35.
InnocentMGabrielPDivardR (2017) Comprendre l’expérience de participation des meilleurs contributeurs dans un contexte de crowdsourcing d’activités inventives. Recherche et Applications en Marketing32(1): 3–21.
36.
JonesEEDavisKE (1965) From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology2: 219–266.
37.
KatzEBlumlerJGGurevitchM (1973) Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly37(4): 509–523.
38.
KavaliovaMVirjeeFMaehleNIngeborgAK (2016) Crowdsourcing innovation and product development: gamification as a motivational driver. Cogent Business & Management3(1): 1128132.
39.
KrugerJWirtzDVan BovenLAlternattTW (2004) The effort heuristic. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology40(1): 91–98.
40.
KullAJHeathTB (2016) You decide, we donate: Strengthening consumer–brand relationships through digitally co-created social responsibility. International Journal of Research in Marketing33(1): 78–92.
41.
LejeuneC (2019) Manuel d’analyse qualitative. Analyser sans compter ni classer 2ème édition. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur.
42.
LiljedalKT (2016) The effects of advertising consumer co-created new products: a brand-alliance framework model can predict perceptions about co-created brands and their creators. Journal of Advertising Research56(1): 53–63.
43.
LiljedalKTBergH (2020) Consumer responses to pictures of co-creating consumers in marketing communications. Journal of Consumer Marketing37(7): 775–784.
44.
LiljedalKTDahlénM (2018) Consumers’ response to other consumers’ participation in new product development. Journal of Marketing Communications24(3): 217–229.
45.
LoerschCPayneBK (2011) The situated inference model: an integrative account of the effects of primes on perception, behavior, and motivation. Perspectives on Psychological Science6(3): 234–252.
46.
MartinezMG (2017) Inspiring crowdsourcing communities to create novel solutions: competition design and the mediating role of trust. Technological Forecasting and Social Change117: 296–304.
47.
MeißnerMHaurandMDStummerC (2017) With a little help from my customers: the influence of customer empowerment on consumers’ perceptions of well-established brands. International Journal of Innovation Management21(06): 1–28.
48.
MoayedikiaAYeohWOngKLBooYL (2019) Improving accuracy and lowering cost in crowdsourcing through an unsupervised expertise estimation approach. Decision Support Systems122: 113065–113065.
49.
MorgesonFPHumphreySE (2006) The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology91(6): 1321–1339.
50.
NambisanSBaronRA (2009) Virtual customer environments: testing a model of voluntary participation in value co-creation activities. Journal of Product Innovation Management26(4): 388–406.
51.
NishikawaHSchreierMOgawaS (2013) User-generated versus designer-generated products: a performance assessment at Muji. International Journal of Research in Marketing30(2): 160–167.
52.
NishikawaHSchreierMFuchsCOgawaS (2017) The value of marketing crowdsourced new products as such: evidence from two randomized field experiments. Journal of Marketing Research54(4) : 525–539.
53.
OertzenASOdekerken-Schröder, BraxSMaherB (2018) Co-creating services—conceptual clarification, forms and outcomes. Journal of Service Management29(4): 641–679.
54.
OgawaSPillerFT (2006) Reducing the risks of new product development. Sloan Management Review47(2): 65–71.
55.
PahariaNSwaminathanV (2019) Who is wary of user design? The role of power-distance beliefs in preference for user-designed products. Journal of Marketing83(3): 91–107.
56.
PiazzaMMazzolaEPerroneG (2022) How can I signal my quality to emerge from the crowd? A study in the crowdsourcing context. Technological Forecasting and Social Change176(121473): 1–12.
57.
PoetzMKSchreierM (2012) The value of crowdsourcing: can users really compete with professionals in generating new products ideas?Journal of Product Innovation Management29(2): 245–256.
58.
PointSFourboulC (2006) Le codage à visée théorique. Recherche et Applications en Marketing21(4) : 61–78.
59.
PrahaladCKRamaswamyV (2004) Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing18(3): 5–14.
60.
RamaniGKumarV (2008) Interaction orientation and firm performance. Journal of Marketing72(1): 27–45.
61.
RamaswamyVGouillartF (2010) Building the co-creative enterprise. Harvard business Review88(10): 100–109.
62.
RyanRMDeciEL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist55(1): 68–78.
63.
RyanRMDeciEL (2008) A Self-determination theory approach to psychotherapy: the motivational basis for effective change. Canadian Psychology49(3): 186–193.
64.
SalgadoSHemonnet-GoujotAHenardDHetDeBarnierV (2020) The dynamics of innovation contest experience: an integrated framework from the customer’s perspective. Journal of Business Research117: 29–43.
65.
SchreierMFuchsCDahlCD (2012) The innovation effect of user design: exploring consumers’ innovation perceptions of firms selling products designed by users. Journal of Marketing76(5): 18–32.
66.
ShawIHollandS (2014) Doing Qualitative Research in Social Work. London: SAGE.
67.
ShawGBaileyAWilliamsA (2011) Aspects of service-dominant logic and its implications for tourism management: examples from the hotel industry. Tourism Management32(2): 207–214.
68.
SheldonKMKasserT (1995) Coherence and congruence: two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology68(3): 531–543.
69.
SheldonKMMcGregorHA (2000) Extrinsic value orientation and “The Tragedy of the Commons”. Journal of Personality68(2): 383–411.
70.
ShiXEvansRPanWShanW (2022) Understanding the effects of personality traits on solver engagement in crowdsourcing communities: a moderated mediation investigation. Information Technology & People35(2): 750–780.
71.
SpeerPWPetersonNAArmsteadTL, et al. (2013) The influence of participation, gender and organizational sense of community on psychological empowerment: the moderating effects of income. Journal of Community Psychology51(1): 103–113.
72.
SteilsNHanineS (2016) Creative contests: knowledge generation and underlying learning dynamics for idea generation. Journal of Marketing Management32(17–18): 1647–1669.
73.
StewartDW (2009) Marketing accountability: linking marketing actions to financial results. Journal of Business Research62(6): 636–643.
74.
ThompsonDVMalaviyaP (2013) Consumer-generated ads: does awareness of advertising co-creation help or hurt persuasion?Journal of Marketing77(3): 33–47.
75.
UllahAZhangQAhmedM (2021) The influence of intellectual property rights protection on contribution efforts of participants in online crowdsourcing contests. Computers in Human Behavior123: 106869.
76.
Van DijkJAntonidesGSchillewaertN (2014) Effects of co-creation claim on consumer brand perceptions and behavioral intentions. International Journal of Consumer Studies38(1): 110–118.
77.
VerleyeK (2015) The co-creation experience from the customer perspective: its measurement and determinants. Journal of Service Management26(2): 321–342.
78.
VernetteEHamdi-KidarL (2013) Co-creation with consumers: who has the competence and wants to cooperate. International Journal of Market Research55(4): 539–561.
79.
VernetteETissier-DesbordesE (2012) La participation du client, la co-production, la co-création: un nouvel eldorado pour le marketing?Décisions Marketing (65): 5–8.
80.
VernetteEBeji-BecheurAGolletyMHamdi-KidarL (2013) Les lead-users en marketing : interrogations et nouvelles contributions psychométriques. Recherche et Applications en Marketing28(4): 3–27.
81.
Von HippelE (1998) Economics of product development by users: the impact of “sticky” local information. Management Science44(5): 629–644.
82.
Von HippelEVon KroghG (2003) Open Source Software and the ‘private-collective’ innovation model: issues for organization science. Organization Science14(2): 209–223.
83.
WangHSNobleCHDahlDWParkS (2019) Successfully communicating a cocreated innovation. Journal of Marketing83(4):38–57.
84.
WormSBharadwajSUlagaWReinartzW (2017) When and why do customer solutions pay off in business markets?Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science45(4): 490–512.
85.
ZhuHDjurjaginaKLekerJ (2014) Innovative behaviour types and their influence on individual crowdsourcing performancesInternational Journal of Innovation Management. 18(6): 1–18.
86.
ZimmermanMARappaportJ (1988) Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology16(5): 725–750.