AlbouyJ (2017) Emotions and prosocial behaviours: a study of the effectiveness of shocking charity campaigns. Recherche et Applications en Marketing32(2) : 4–25.
2.
AndreoniJPayneAA (2013) Charitable giving. In: AuerbachAAuerbachAJ (éds) Handbook of Public EconomicsVol. 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1–50.
3.
BarraC (2014) When do political ideologies affect brand extension evaluation? The role of analytic versus holistic mindsets. Thèse de doctorat: University of South Carolina.
4.
BasilDZRidgwayNMBasilMD (2006) Guilt appeals: the mediating effect of responsibility. Psychology et Marketing23(12): 1035–1054.
5.
BatsonCD (1998) Altruism and prosocial behavior. In: GilbertDTFiskeSTLindzeyG (éds) The Handbook of Social Psychology 4ème édition,.Vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill, 282–316.
6.
BatsonCD (2014) The Altruism Question: Toward a Social-psychological Answer. New York et Hove: Psychology Press.
7.
BaughanE (2012) The Imperial War Relief Fund and the All British Appeal: Commonwealth, conflict and conservatism within the British Humanitarian Movement, 1920–25. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History40(5): 845–861.
8.
BaumeisterRFStillwellAMHeathertonTF (1994) Guilt: an interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin115(2): 243–267.
9.
BennettRKerriganFO’ReillyDLeeZSargeantA (2011) Dealing with social desirability bias: an application to charitable giving. European Journal of Marketing45(5) : 703–719.
10.
BergadaàM (2006) Le don d’objet: l’exploration de ses dimensions et des profils de donneurs aux œuvres de bienfaisance. Recherche et Applications en Marketing21(1): 19–39.
11.
BockDEEastmanJKEastmanKL (2018) Encouraging consumer charitable behavior: the impact of charitable motivations, gratitude, and materialism. Journal of Business Ethics150(4): 1213–1228.
12.
BoeufB (2019) Political ideology and health risk perceptions of food. Social Science et Medicine236: 112405.
13.
BrassDJButterfieldKDSkaggsBC (1998) Relationships and unethical behavior: a social network perspective. Academy of Management Review23(1): 14–31.
14.
BrewerMB (2004) Taking the social origins of human nature seriously: toward a more imperialist social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review8(2): 107–113.
15.
BrooksAC (2006) The great divide in American giving. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law9(1): 10.
16.
BrulleRJ (2014) Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of US climate change counter-movement organizations. Climatic Change122(4): 681–694.
17.
CapraraGVZimbardoPG (2004) Personalizing politics: a congruency model of political preference. American Psychologist59(7): 581–594.
18.
CapraraGVAlessandriGEisenbergN (2012) Prosociality: the contribution of traits, values, and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology102(6): 1289–1303.
19.
CapraraGVSchwartzSCapannaCVecchioneMBarbaranelliC (2006) Personality and politics: values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology27(1): 1–28.
20.
CarloGPytlikZilligLMRoeschSCDienstbierRA (2009) The elusive altruist: the psychological study of the altruistic personality. In: NarvaezDLapsleyDK (éds) Personality, Identity, and Character: Explorations in Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 271–294.
21.
CarneyDRJostJTGoslingSDPotterJ (2008) The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology29(6): 807–840.
22.
CastanoEYzerbytVBourguignonDSeronE (2002) Who may enter? The impact of in-group identification on in-group/out-group categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology38(3): 315–322.
23.
ChaMKYiYLeeJ (2020) When people low in social class become a persuasive source of communication: social class of other donors and charitable donations. Journal of Business Research112: 45–55.
24.
ChapmanCMLouisWRMasserBM (2018) Identifying (our) donors: toward a social psychological understanding of charity selection in Australia. Psychology et Marketing35(12): 980–989.
ChomaBLBusseriMASadavaSW (2009) Liberal and conservative political ideologies: different routes to happiness?Journal of Research in Personality43(3): 502–505.
27.
CialdiniRBBrownSLLewisBPLuceCNeubergSL (1997) Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship: when one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology73(3): 481–494.
28.
CopelandL (2014). Value change and political action: postmaterialism, political consumerism, and political participation. American Politics Research42(2): 257–282.
29.
CopelandLBoulianneS (2020) Political consumerism: a meta-analysis. International Political Science Review43(1): 3–18.
30.
CuryFElliotASarrazinPDa FonsecaDRufoM (2002) The trichotomous achievement goal model and intrinsic motivation: a sequential mediational analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology38(5): 473–481.
31.
DavisMH (1994) Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Madison WI: Brown, Benchmark.
32.
De HoogeIENelissenRBreugelmansSMZeelenbergM (2011) What is moral about guilt? Acting “prosocially” at the disadvantage of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology100(3): 462–473.
33.
De VriesNJReisRMoscatoP (2015) Clustering consumers based on trust, confidence and giving behaviour: data-driven model building for charitable involvement in the Australian not-for-profit sector. PLos One10(4): e0122133.
34.
DenisEPecheuxCWarlopL (2020) When public recognition inhibits prosocial behavior: the case of charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly49(5): 951–968.
DuartePAdOSilvaSC (2020) The role of consumer-cause identification and attitude in the intention to purchase cause-related products. International Marketing Review37(4): 603–620
37.
EinolfCJ (2017) Cross-national differences in charitable giving in the west and the world. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations28(2): 472–491.
38.
ElliotAJ (1999) Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist34(3): 169–189.
39.
ElliotAJConroyDE (2005) Beyond the dichotomous model of achievement goals in sport and exercise psychology. Sport and Exercise Psychology Review1(1): 17–25.
40.
ElliotAJHarackiewiczJM (1996) Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: a mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology70(3): 461–475.
41.
ElliotAJGableSLMapesRR (2006) Approach and avoidance motivation in the social domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin32(3): 378–391.
42.
FajardoTMTownsendCBolanderW (2018) Toward an optimal donation solicitation: evidence from the field of the differential influence of donor-related and organization-related information on donation choice and amount. Journal of Marketing82(2): 142–152.
43.
FatkeM (2017) Personality traits and political ideology: a first global assessment. Political Psychology38(5): 881–899.
44.
FélixA (2015) The other side of the coin: women’s participation in far right parties and movements in Greece and Hungary. Intersections1(1).
45.
FernandesD2020Politics at the Mall: the moral foundations of boycotts. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing39(4): 494–513.
46.
FernandesDMandelN (2014) Political conservatism and variety-seeking. Journal of Consumer Psychology24(1): 79–86.
47.
FissPCHirschPM (2005) The discourse of globalization: framing and sensemaking of an emerging concept. American Sociological Review70(1): 29–52.
48.
FrederiksenCS (2010) The relation between policies concerning corporate social responsibility (CSR) and philosophical moral theories–an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics93(3): 357–371.
49.
FriesenJPCampbellTHKayAC (2015) The psychological advantage of unfalsifiability: the appeal of untestable religious and political ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology108(3): 515–529.
50.
GableSL (2006) Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. Journal of Personality74(1): 175–222.
51.
GhorbaniMLiaoYÇayköylüSChandM (2013) Guilt, shame, and reparative behavior: the effect of psychological proximity. Journal of Business Ethics114(2): 311–323.
52.
Giving USA Foundation (2019) The Annual Report on Philantropy. Disponible en ligne: https://givingusa.org/
53.
GoldbergLR (1999) A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe7(1): 7–28.
54.
GorenP (2012) Political values and political awareness. Critical Review24(4): 505–525.
55.
GrahamJHaidtJNosekBA (2009) Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96(5): 1029–1046.
56.
GratonARicFGonzalezE (2016) Reparation or reactance? The influence of guilt on reaction to persuasive communication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology62: 40–49.
57.
HaidtJ (2008) Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science. Association for Psychological Science3(1): 65–72.
58.
HaugeKE (2016) Generosity and guilt: the role of beliefs and moral standards of others. Journal of Economic Psychology54: 35–43.
59.
HongYHuYBurtchG (2018) Embeddedness, pro-sociality, and social influence: evidence from online crowdfunding. MIS Quarterly42(4):1211–1224.
60.
HuangCLTsaiJL (2015) Managerial morality and philanthropic decision-making: a test of an agency model. Journal of Business Ethics132(4): 795–811.
61.
JamalAYaccobABartikowskiBSlaterS (2019) Motivations to donate: exploring the role of religiousness in charitable donations. Journal of Business Research103: 319–327.
62.
Janoff-BulmanR (2009) To provide or protect: motivational bases of political liberalism and conservatism. Psychological Inquiry20(2–3): 120–128.
63.
Janoff-BulmanRSheikhSBaldacciKG (2008) Mapping moral motives: approach, avoidance, and political orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology44(4): 1091–1099.
64.
JedingerABurgerAM (2021) Do smarter people have more conservative economic attitudes? Assessing the relationship between cognitive ability and economic ideology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Disponible en ligne: doi:10.1177/01461672211046808.
65.
JinFZhuHTuP (2020) How recipient group membership affects the effect of power states on prosocial behaviors. Journal of Business Research108: 307–315.
66.
JonesTM (1991) Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review16(2): 366–395.
67.
JostJT (2006) The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist61(7): 651–670.
68.
JostJT (2017) Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology38(2): 167–208.
69.
JostJTFedericoCMNapierJL (2009) Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology60: 307–337.
70.
JungKGarbarinoEBrileyDAWynhausenJ (2017) Blue and red voices: effects of political ideology on consumers’ complaining and disputing behavior. Journal of Consumer Research44(3): 477–499.
71.
KaikatiAMTorelliCJWinterichKPRodasMA (2017) Conforming conservatives: how salient social identities can increase donations. Journal of Consumer Psychology27(4): 422–434.
72.
KamathamSHPahwaPJiangJKumarN (2021) Effect of appeal content on fundraising success and donor behavior. Journal of Business Research125: 827–839.
73.
KerrJPanagopoulosCvan der LindenS (2021) Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States. Personality and Individual Differences179: 110892.
74.
KhanRMisraKSinghV (2013) Ideology and brand consumption. Psychological Science24(3): 326–333.
75.
KidwellBFarmerAHardestyDM (2013) Getting liberals and conservatives to go green: political ideology and congruent appeals. Journal of Consumer Research40(2): 350–367.
76.
KimJCParkBDuboisD (2018) How consumers’ political ideology and status-maintenance goals interact to shape their desire for luxury goods. Journal of Marketing82(6): 132–149.
77.
KleinSAHeckDWReeseGHilbigBE (2019) On the relationship between openness to experience, political orientation, and pro-environmental behavior. Personality and Individual Differences138: 344–348.
78.
Le Gall-ElyM (2013) Giving in consumer research and marketing: a state of the art. Recherche et Applications en Marketing28(4): 44–67.
79.
LeeSWinterichKPRossWTJr (2014) I’m moral, but I won’t help you: the distinct roles of empathy and justice in donations. Journal of Consumer Research41(3): 678–696.
80.
LeeZSargeantA (2011) Dealing with social desirability bias: an application to charitable giving. European Journal of Marketing45(5): 703–719.
81.
LevinIPSchneiderSLGaethGJ (1998) All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes76(2): 149–188.
82.
LochbaumMJean-NoelJPinarCGilsonT (2017) A meta-analytic review of Elliot’s (1999) Hierarchical Model of Approach and Avoidance Motivation in the sport, physical activity, and physical education literature. Journal of Sport and Health Science6(1): 68–80.
83.
LorozPS (2007) The interaction of message frames and reference points in prosocial persuasive appeals. Psychology et Marketing24(11): 1001–1023.
84.
MaderMSteinerNDSchoenH (2020) The globalisation divide in the public mind: belief systems on globalisation and their electoral consequences. Journal of European Public Policy27(10): 1526–1545.
85.
MargolisMFSancesMW (2017) Partisan differences in nonpartisan activity: the case of charitable giving. Political Behavior39(4): 839–864.
86.
MenclJMayDR (2008) The effects of proximity and empathy on ethical decision-making: an exploratory investigation. Journal of Business Ethics85: 201–226.
87.
MerchantAFordJBRoseG (2011) How personal nostalgia influences giving to charity. Journal of Business Research64(6): 610–616.
88.
MichelGRieunierS (2012) Nonprofit brand image and typicality influences on charitable giving. Journal of Business Research65(5): 701–707.
89.
MocanNTekinE (2007) The determinants of the willingness to donate an organ among young adults: evidence from the United States and the European Union. Social Science et Medicine65(12): 2527–2538.
90.
MukherjeeALeeSYBurnhamT (2020) The effect of others’ participation on charitable behavior: moderating role of recipient resource scarcity. Journal of Business Research120: 213–228.
91.
MuralidharanSSheehanK (2018) The role of guilt in influencing sustainable pro-environmental behaviors among shoppers: differences in response by gender to messaging about England’s plastic-bag levy. Journal of Advertising Research58(3): 349–362.
92.
NilssonAErlandssonAVästfjällD (2016) The congruency between moral foundations and intentions to donate, self-reported donations, and actual donations to charity. Journal of Research in Personality65: 22–29.
93.
OrdabayevaNFernandesD (2018) Better or different? How political ideology shapes preferences for differentiation in the social hierarchy. Journal of Consumer Research45(2): 227–250.
94.
OysermanD (2006) High power, low power, and equality: culture beyond individualism and collectivism. Journal of Consumer Psychology16(4): 352–356.
95.
OysermanDSchwarzN (2017) Conservatism as a situated identity: implications for consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology27(4): 532–536.
96.
PecotFVasilopoulouSCavallaroM (2021) How political ideology drives anti-consumption manifestations. Journal of Business Research128: 61–69.
PetersonNTripoliELangenbachKDevasagayamR (2018) Celebrity endorsements and donations: empirical investigation of impact on philanthropic giving. Business Perspectives and Research6(2): 79–89.
99.
PittmanM (2020) Accountability moderates the effects of egoistic and altruistic appeals in prosocial messages. Journal of Consumer Marketing37(7): 807–820.
100.
PriorM (2013) Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science16: 101–127.
101.
RanganathanSKHenleyWH (2008) Determinants of charitable donation intentions: a structural equation model. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing13(1): 1–11.
102.
RifkinJRDuKMBergerJ (2021) Penny for your preferences: leveraging self-expression to encourage small prosocial gifts. Journal of Marketing85(3): 204–219.
103.
RoosJMShacharR (2014) When Kerry met Sally: politics and perceptions in the demand for movies. Management Science60(7): 1617–1631.
104.
SaltmarshJ (1997) Addams, Day, and Dewey: the emergence of community service in American culture. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning137–149.
105.
SargeantA (1999) Charitable giving: towards a model of donor behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management15(4): 215–238.
106.
SargeantAJayE (2014) Fundraising Management: Analysis, Planning and Practice. Londres et New York: Routledge.
107.
SchatzRTStaubELavineH (1999) On the varieties of national attachment: blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology20(1): 151–174.
108.
ShangJReedASargeantACarpenterK (2020) Marketplace donations: the role of moral identity discrepancy and gender. Journal of Marketing Research57(2): 375–393.
109.
SchwartzSHHowardJA (1981) A normative decision-making model of altruism. In: RushtonPJSorrentinoRM (éds) Altruism and Helping Behavior: Social, Personality, and Developmental Perspectives. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 189–211.
110.
SkitkaLJMorganGSWisneskiDC (2015) Political orientation and moral conviction: a conservative advantage or an equal opportunity motivator of political engagement. In: ForgasJPFiedlerKCranoWD (éds) Social Psychology and Politics. New York et Londres: Psychology Press, 57–74.
111.
SneddonJNEversULeeJA (2020) Personal values and choice of charitable cause: an exploration of donors’ giving behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly49(4): 803–826.
112.
SommetNElliotAJJamiesonJPButeraF (2019) Income inequality, perceived competitiveness, and approach-avoidance motivation. Journal of Personality87(4): 767–784.
113.
SpillerSAFitzsimonsGJLynchJGJrMcClellandGH (2013) Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research50(2): 277–288.
114.
SteinerNDHillenS (2021) Vote choices of left-authoritarians: misperceived congruence and issue salience. Electoral Studies70, 102280.
115.
StrachmanAGableSL (2006) Approach and avoidance relationship commitment. Motivation and Emotion30(2): 117–126.
116.
TedinKL (1987) Political ideology and the vote. Research in Micropolitics2(1): 63–94.
117.
VaidyanathanBHillJPSmithC (2011) Religion and charitable financial giving to religious and secular causes: does political ideology matter?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion50(3): 450–469.
118.
ValdesoloPDeStenoD (2011) Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion. Emotion11(2): 262–266.
119.
ValentinovV (2011) The meaning of nonprofit organization: insights from classical institutionalism. Journal of Economic Issues45(4): 901–916.
120.
Van DiepenMDonkersBFransesPH (2009) Does irritation induced by charitable direct mailings reduce donations?International Journal of Research in Marketing26(3): 180–188.
121.
Van DijkMVan HerkHPrinsR (2019) Choosing your charity: the importance of value congruence in two-stage donation choices. Journal of Business Research105: 283–292.
122.
Van EschPCuiYGJainSP (2021) The effect of political ideology and message frame on donation intent during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Research125: 201–213.
123.
Van KenhovePVermeirIVerniersS (2001) An empirical investigation of the relationships between ethical beliefs, ethical ideology, political preference and need for closure. Journal of Business Ethics32(4): 347–361.
124.
Van LangePABekkersRChirumboloALeoneL (2012) Are conservatives less likely to be prosocial than liberals? From games to ideology, political preferences and voting. European Journal of Personality26(5): 461–473.
125.
VerhaertGAVan den PoelD (2011) Empathy as added value in predicting donation behavior. Journal of Business Research64(12): 1288–1295.
126.
VerveniotiT (2002) Charity and nationalism. The Greek Civil War and the entrance of right-wing women into politics. In: BacchettaPPowerM (éds) Right-Wing Women: from Conservatives to Extremists Around the World. New York et Londres: Routledge, 115–226.
127.
WallaceEBuilIetDeChernatonyL (2020) ‘Consuming good’on social media: what can conspicuous virtue signalling on Facebook tell us about prosocial and unethical intentions?Journal of Business Ethics162(3): 577–592.
128.
WatkinsLAitkenRMatherD (2016) Conscientious consumers: a relationship between moral foundations, political orientation and sustainable consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production134: 137–146.
129.
WinterichKPMittalVRossWTJr (2009) Donation behavior toward in-groups and out-groups: the role of gender and moral identity. Journal of Consumer Research36(2): 199–214.
130.
WinterichKPZhangYMittalV (2012) How political identity and charity positioning increase donations: insights from moral foundations theory. International Journal of Research in Marketing29(4): 346–354.
131.
WinterichKZhangY (2014) Accepting inequality deters responsibility: how power distance decreases charitable behavior. Journal of Consumer Research41(2): 274–293.
132.
YangYLiuP (2021) Are conservatives more charitable than liberals in the US? A meta-analysis of political ideology and charitable giving. Social Science Research102598.
133.
ZallerJR (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
134.
ZhangXJeongEOlsonEDEvansG (2020) Investigating the effect of message framing on event attendees’ engagement with advertisement promoting food waste reduction practices. International Journal of Hospitality Management89: 102589.
135.
ZhuHWongNHuangM (2019) Does relationship matter? How social distance influences perceptions of responsibility on anthropomorphized environmental objects and conservation intentions. Journal of Business Research95: 62–70.
136.
ZlatevJJMillerDT (2016) Selfishly benevolent or benevolently selfish: when self-interest undermines versus promotes prosocial behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes137: 112–122.