Les individus se fient aux avis publiés sur Internet dans leur décision d’achat. Toutefois, la crédibilité des avis d’internautes est remise en cause suite à la croissance des pratiques frauduleuses des entreprises publiant de faux avis. Différents mécanismes qui aident les internautes à détecter les faux avis sont examinés dans trois études expérimentales. Les résultats confirment l’importance d’une activation d’un mode de protection ainsi que les effets de deux des mécanismes potentiels étudiés sur la crédibilité. Cette recherche contribue au champ des interactions en ligne par la mise en avant de l’importance des facteurs contextuels – plutôt que textuels – comme les certifications et la cohérence des avis émis dans le processus de détection des faux-avis par les internautes.
AikenKDBoushDM (2006) Trustmarks, objective-source ratings, and implied investments in advertising: investigating online trust and the context-specific nature of Internet signals. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science34(3): 308–323.
5.
AndrewsJCNetemeyerRGBurtonS (1998) Consumer generalization of nutrient content claims in advertising. Journal of Marketing62(4): 62–75.
6.
Anonyme (2010) Hotelbewertungen im Internet – Jeder ein Tester. Stiftung Warentest. Test 2–2010 (76–79).
7.
BaSPavlouPA (2002) Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly26(3): 243–268.
8.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
9.
BartYShankarVSultanF (2005) Are the drivers and role of online trust the same for all web sites and consumers? A large-scale exploratory empirical study. Journal of Marketing69(4): 133–152.
10.
BenedicktusRL (2011) The effects of 3rd party consensus information on service expectations and online trust. Journal of Business Research64(8): 844–853.
11.
BenedicktusRLBradyMKDarkeP (2010) Conveying trustworthiness to online consumers: reactions to consensus, physical store presence, brand familiarity, and generalized suspicion. Journal of Retailing86(4): 322–335.
12.
BerinskyAJHuberGALenzGS (2012) Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis20(3): 351–368.
13.
BhattaraiARusVDasguptaD (2009) Characterizing comment spam in the blogosphere through content analysis. In: Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Cyber Security (CICS) at the IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI 2009). Nashville, TN.
14.
BoltonGEKatokEOckenfelsA (2004) How effective are electronic reputation mechanisms? An experimental investigation. Management Science50(11): 1587–1602.
15.
BoushDMFriestadMWrightP (2009) Deception in the Marketplace. New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
BradleyGLSparksBA (2009) Dealing with service failures: the use of explanations. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing26(2): 129–143.
17.
BrownJBroderickAJLeeN (2007) Word of mouth communication within online communities: conceptualizing the online social network. Journal of Interactive Marketing21(3): 2–20.
18.
BuhrmesterMDKwangTGoslingSD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: a new source of cheap, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science6(1): 3–5.
19.
ChatterjeeP (2001) Online reviews: do consumers use them? In: GillyMCMyers-LevyJ (éd.) Advances in Consumer Research8: 129–133.
20.
ChevalierJAMayzlinD (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research43(3): 345–354.
21.
CialdiniRB (2007) Influence: the Psychology of Persuasion. New York, NY: HaperCollins.
22.
ColquittJAScottBALePineJA (2007) Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology92(4): 909–927.
DellarocasCZhangXAwadNF (2007) Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: the case of motion pictures. Journal of Interactive Marketing21(4): 23–45.
28.
DuanWGuBWhinstonAB (2008) The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and product sales: an empirical investigation of the movie industry. Journal of Retailing84(2): 233–242.
29.
FormanCGhoseAWiesenfeldB (2008) Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: the role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research19(3): 291–313.
30.
FriestadMWrightP (1994) The Persuasion Knowledge Model: how people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research21(1): 1–31.
31.
GoodmanJKCryderCECheemaA (2013) Data collection in a flat world: the strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making26(3): 213–224.
32.
GrazioliSJarvenpaaSL (2000) Perils of Internet fraud: an empirical investigation of deception and trust with experienced Internet consumers. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans30(4): 395–410.
33.
GrazioliSJarvenpaaSL (2003a) Consumer and business deception on the Internet: content analysis of documentary evidence. International Journal of Electronic Commerce7(4): 93–118.
34.
GrazioliSJarvenpaaSL (2003b) Deceived: under target online. Communications of the ACM46(12): 196–203.
35.
GrazioliSWangA (2001) Looking without seeing: understanding unsophisticated consumers’ success and failure to detect internet deception. In: 22nd International Conference on Information Systems. New Orleans, LA. 193–203.
36.
GuptaPHarrisJ (2010) How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: a motivation to process information perspective. Journal of Business Research63(9/10): 1041–1049.
37.
HairJFJBlackWCBabinBJ (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
38.
HairJFJHultGTMRingleCM (2014) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
39.
HammersleyJSBamberEMCarpenterTD (2010) The influence of documentation specificity and priming on auditors’ fraud risk assessments and evidence evaluation decisions. The Accounting Review85(2): 547–571.
40.
HayesAF. (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
41.
HendersonSGildingM (2004) ‘I’ve never clicked this much with anyone in my life’: trust and hyperpersonal communication in online friendships. New Media & Society6(4): 487–506.
42.
Hennig-ThurauTGwinnerKPWalshG (2004) Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet?Journal of Interactive Marketing18(1): 38–52.
43.
HessRLJrGanesanSKleinNM (2003) Service failure and recovery: the impact of relationship factors on customer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science31(2): 127–145.
44.
HovlandCIJanisILKelleyHH (1953) Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
45.
JindalNLiuB (2008) Opinion spam and analysis. In: 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. Stanford, CA: ACM, 219–230.
46.
JohnsonPEGrazioliSJamalK (2001) Detecting deception: adversarial problem solving in a low base-rate world. Cognitive Science25(3): 355–392.
47.
KelleyHHMichelaJL (1980) Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology31: 457–501.
48.
KirmaniARaoAR (2000) No pain, no gain: a critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. Journal of Marketing64(2): 66–79.
49.
KozinetsRV (1999) E-tribalized marketing?: The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European Management Journal17(3): 252–264.
50.
KozinetsRVBelzF-MMcDonaghP (2012) Social media for social change – A transformative consumer research perspective. In: MickDGPettigrewSPechmannC (éd.) Transformative Consumer Research for Personal and Collective Well-Being. New York, NY: Routledge, 205–223.
51.
KusumasondjajaSShankaTMarchegianiC (2012) Credibility of online reviews and initial trust: the roles of reviewer’s identity and review valence. Journal of Vacation Marketing18(3): 185–195.
52.
LankesD (2008) Trusting the Internet: New approaches to credibility tools. In: MetzgerMJFlanaginAJ (éd.) Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 101–122.
53.
LeeMKOTurbanE (2001) A trust model for consumer Internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce6(1): 75–91.
54.
Lepkowska-WhiteEBrashearTGWeinbergerMG (2003) A test of ad appeal effectiveness in Poland and the United States: the interplay of appeal, product, and culture. Journal of Advertising32(3): 57–67.
55.
LiFHuangMYangY (2011) Learning to identify review spam. In: WalshT (éd.) Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Barcelona, Spain: AAAI Press/International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, 2488–2493.
56.
LimE-PNguyenV-AJindalN (2010) Detecting product review spammers using rating behaviors. In: 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. Toronto, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery.
57.
LindellMKWhitneyDJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-selectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology86(1): 114–121.
58.
LiuY (2006) Word of mouth for movies: its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing70(3): 74–89.
59.
MacKinnonDPFairchildAJFritzMS (2007) Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology58(1): 593–614.
MalhotraNKKimSSPatilA (2006) Common method variance in IS research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science52(12): 1865–1883.
62.
MasipJGarridoEHerreroC (2004) Defining deception. Anales de Psocologica20(1): 147–171.
63.
MasonWSuriS (2012) Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods44(1): 1–23.
64.
MayzlinDDoverYChevalierJ (2014) Promotional reviews: an empirical investigation of online review manipulation. American Economic Review104(8): 2421–2455.
65.
MorganRMHuntSD (1994) The Commitment-Trust Theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing58(3): 20–38.
66.
MukherjeeALiuBGlanceN (2012) Spotting fake reviewer groups in consumer reviews. In: 21st international conference on World Wide Web. Lyon, France: Association for Computing Machinery, 191–200.
67.
MukherjeeALiuBWangJ (2011) Detecting group review spam. In: 20th international conference companion on World wide web. Hyderabad, India: Association for Computing Machinery, 93–94.
68.
MukherjeeAVenkataramanVLiuB (2013) What Yelp fake review filter might be doing? In: 7th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM’13). Boston, MA.
ObermillerCSpangenbergEMacLachlanDL (2005) Ad skepticism: the consequences of disbelief. Journal of Advertising34(3): 7–17.
71.
OliverRLBeardenWO (1985) Crossover effects in the Theory of Reasoned Action: a moderating influence attempt. Journal of Consumer Research12(3): 324–340.
72.
OrvisBRCunninghamJDKelleyHH (1975) A closer examination of causal inference: the roles of consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency information. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology32(4): 605–616.
73.
OttMCardieCHancockJ (2012) Estimating the prevalence of deception in online review communities. In: 21st international conference on World Wide Web. Lyon, France: Association for Computing Machinery, 201–210.
74.
OttMChoiYCardieC (2011) Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In: 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Portland, OR: 309–319.
75.
PanYZhangJC (2011) Born unequal: a study of the helpfulness of user-generated product reviews. Journal of Retailing87(4): 598–612.
76.
PaolacciGChandlerJ (2014) Inside the Turk: understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science23(3): 184–188.
77.
PaolacciGChandlerJIpeirotisPG (2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making5(5): 411–419.
78.
ParkCLeeTM (2009) Antecedents of online reviews’ usage and purchase influence: an empirical comparison of U.S. and Korean consumers. Journal of Interactive Marketing23(4): 332–340.
79.
PavlouPADimokaA (2006) The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation. Information Systems Research17(4): 392–414.
80.
PeerEVosgerauJAcquistiA (2014) Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods46(4): 1023–1031.
81.
PeppersDRogersM (2012) Extreme Trust - Honesty as a Competititive Advantage. New York, NY: Portfolio/Penguin.
82.
PerdueBCSummersJO (1986) Checking the success of manipulations in marketing experiments. Journal of Marketing Research23(4): 317–326.
83.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBJeong-YeonL (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879.
84.
PodsakoffPMOrganDW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management12(4): 531.
85.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods40(3): 879–891.
86.
RandDG (2012) The promise of Mechanical Turk: how online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. Journal of Theoretical Biology299(21): 172–179.
87.
RubleDNFeldmanNS (1976) Order of consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency information and causal attributions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology34(5): 930–937.
88.
SchindlerRMBickartB (2005) Published word of mouth: referable, consumer-generated information on the Internet. In: HaugtvedtCPMachleit etKAYalchRF (éd.) Online Consumer Psychology: Understanding and influencing consumer behavior in the virtual world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 35–61.
89.
SchlosserAEWhiteTBLloydSM (2006) Converting web site visitors into buyers: how web site investment increases consumer trusting beliefs and online purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing70(2): 133–148.
90.
SenSLermanD (2007) Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the Web. Journal of Interactive Marketing21(4): 76–94.
91.
SenecalSNantelJ (2004) The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices. Journal of Retailing80(2): 159–169.
92.
SirdeshmukhDSinghJSabolB (2002) Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing66(1): 15–37.
93.
SmithDMenonSSivakumarK (2005) Online peer and editorial recommendations, trust, and choice in virtual markets. Journal of Interactive Marketing19(3): 15–37.
94.
SpragueRWellsME (2010) Regulating online buzz marketing: untangling a web of deceit. American Business Law Journal47(3): 415–454.
95.
StaussB (1997) Global word of mouth – Service bashing on the Internet is a thorny issue. Marketing Management6(3): 28–30.
SunTYounSWuG (2006) Online word-of-mouth (or mouse): an exploration of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication11(4): 1104–1127.
99.
TsangASLPrendergastG (2009) Is a “star” worth a thousand words?European Journal of Marketing43(11/12): 1269–1280.
