Le modèle logit à coefficients aléatoires est le modèle le plus prometteur parmi les modèles de choix discrets. Il généralise le modèle logit multinomial standard et utilise des méthodes de simulation pour l'estimation du modèle. De plus, il permet d'estimer la distribution des propensions marginales à payer.
Ben AkivaM.BolducD.BradleyM. (1993), Estimation of travel choice models with randomly distributed values of time, Transportation Research Record, 1413, 88–97.
2.
BhatC. (2000), Incorporating observed and unobserved heterogeneity in urban work mode choice modeling, Transportation Science, 34, 228–238.
3.
BhatC. (2001), Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model, Transportation Research, Partie B, 35, 677–693.
4.
BonnetC.SimioniM. (2001), Assessing consumer response to protected designation of origin labelling: a mixed multinomial logit approach, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 28, 4, 433–449.
5.
BoizotC.LecoqS. (2003), Demand systems for differentiated products: an application to the foie gras market, Miméo.
6.
BoydJ.MellmanJ. (1980), The effect of fuel economy on the US automotive market: a hedonic demand analysis, Transportation Research, 14, Partie A (5-6), 367–378.
7.
BrownstoneD.TrainK. (1999), Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns, Journal of Econometrics, 89, 109–129.
8.
CardellN.DunbarF. (1980), Measuring the impact of automobile downsizing, Transportation Research, 14, Partie A (5-6), 423–434.
9.
ErdemT. (1996), A dynamic analysis of market structure based on panel data, Marketing Science, 15, 359–378.
10.
GuadagniP.LittleJ. (1983), A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data, Marketing Science, 2, 3, 203–237.
11.
HayashiF. (2000), Econometrics, Princeton University Press.
12.
HensherD.GreeneW. (2002), The mixed logit practice: the state of the practice, Transportation, 30, 2, 133–76.
13.
JuddK.L. (1998), Numerical methods in economics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
McFaddenD.TrainK. (2000), Mixed MNL models for discrete response, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 81, 447–470.
15.
PetrinA.TrainK. (2004), Omitted product attributes in discrete choice model, Université de Chicago et Université de Californie, Berkeley.
16.
ReveltD.TrainK. (1998), Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 4, 647–657.
17.
RuudP. (1996), Approximation and simulation of the multinomial probit model: an analysis of covariance matrix estimation, Berkeley Department of Economics, Université de Californie.
18.
SilvermanB.W. (1986), Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, Londres, Chapman and Hall.
19.
SwaitJ.Ben AkivaM. (1986), Analysis of the effects of captivity on travel time and constant elasticities, Annales de la Conférence Internationale 1985 Travel Behavior, Noordwijk, Hollande, 113–128.
20.
TrainK. (1986), Qualitative choice analysis: theory, econometrics, and an application to automobile demand, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
21.
TrainK. (1998), Recreation demand models with taste variation over people, Land Economics, 74, 2, 230–239.
22.
TrainK. (1999), Halton sequences for mixed logit, papier de recherche n° E00-278, Berkeley Department of Economics, Université de Californie, Berkeley.
23.
TrainK.McFaddenD.Ben AkivaM. (1987), The demand for local telephone service: a fully discrete model of residential calling patterns and services choices, Rand Journal of Economics, 18, 1, 109–123.
24.
TrainK.McFaddenD.GoettA. (1987), Consumer attitudes and voluntary rate schedules for public utilities, Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 3, 383–391.
WalkerJ.Ben AkivaM.BolcucD. (2001), Specification, identification and estimation of the logit kernel (or continuous mixed logit) model, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
