Cet article a pour objectif de tester la transposition d'une échelle de personnalité humaine (Saucier, 1994) sur les marques au moyen d'une analyse factorielle confirmatoire. Notre étude s'appuie sur un échantillon de convenance de 537 étudiants et traite de seize marques achetées dans un contexte français. Une analyse de congruence entre les deux échelles de personnalité montre leur équivalence structurelle; une analyse en composantes principales non linéaires sur les associations entre les traits de personnalité humains et ceux de la marque établit leur équivalence sémantique. Enfin, une analyse canonique généralisée non linéaire permet d'apprécier la validité prédictive de la personnalité du consommateur et celle de la marque.
AakerJ.L. (1997), Dimensions of brand personality, Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 3, 347–356.
2.
AakerJ.L.FournierS. (1995), A brand as a character, a partner and a person: three perspectives on the question of brand personality, Advances in Consumer Research, éds. Kardes et Sujan, 22, 391–395.
3.
AakerJ.L.Benet-MartinezV.GaroleraJ. (2001), Consumption symbols as carriers of culture: a study of Japanese and Spanish brand personality constructs, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 3, 249–264.
4.
AakerJ.L.FournierSBraselS.A. (2001), Charting the development of consumer brand relationships, papier de recherche, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 1716.
5.
AllenD.E.OlsenJ. (1995), Conceptualizing and creating brand personality: a narrative theory approach, papier présenté à l'Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, 22.
6.
AllportG.W. (1937), Personality: a psychological interpretation, New York: Holt.
7.
BatraR.LehmannD.R.SinghD. (1993), The brand personality component of brand goodwill: some antecedents and consequences, Brand equity and advertising, éds. AakerBiel, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 83–96.
8.
BelkR.W. (1988), Possessions and the extended self, Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 2, 139–168.
9.
Benet-MartinezV.WallerN.G. (1997), Further evidence for the cross-cultural generality of the « big seven » model: imported and indigenous Spanish personality construct, Journal of Personality, 65, 3, 567–598.
10.
BentleyC. (1999), Who is my paper anyway? Personality profiling to assess newspaper brand identity, The Community Media Newspapers and Community Building Seminar, National Newspaper Association, 114th Annual Convention, Boston.
11.
BielA. (1993), Converting image into equity, Brand equity and advertising, éds. AakerBiel, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 67–82.
12.
BlockJ. (1995), A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description, Psychological Bulletin, 117, 2, 187–215.
13.
BlockJ. (2001), Brief report. Millennial contrarianism: the five-factor approach to personality description 5 years later, Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 1, 98–107.
14.
BrowneM.CudeckR. (1989), Single sample cross validation indices for covariance structures, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 4, 445–455.
15.
BrowneM.CudeckR. (1993), Alternative ways of assessing model fit, Testing structural equation models, éds. BollenLong, Sage, 136–163.
16.
CapraraG.V.BarbaranelliC.GuidoG. (1997), Personality as metaphor: extension of the psycho-lexical hypothesis and the five-factor model to brand and product personality description, European Advances in Consumer Research, éds. EnglisOlofsson, 3, 61–69.
17.
CapraraG.V.BarbaranelliC.GuidoG. (2001), Brand personality: how to make the metaphor fit?, Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 3, 377–395.
18.
CapraraG.V.BarbaranelliC.LiviS. (1994), Mapping personality dimensions in the big five model, European Review of Applied Psychology, 44, 1, 9–15.
19.
CattellR.B. (1950), Personality: a systematic theoretical and factual study, New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
CattellR.B.EberH.W.TatsuokaM.M. (1970), The handbook for the sixteen-personality factor questionnaire, Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
21.
ChanW.HoR.LeungK.ChanD.YungY. (1999), An alternative method for evaluating congruence coefficients with procrustes rotation: a bootstrap procedure, Psychological Methods, 4, 4, 378–403.
22.
ChurchA.T.KatigbakM.S.ReyesJ.A. (1998), Further exploration of Filipino personality structure using the lexical approach: do the big-five or big-seven dimensions emerge?, European Journal of Personality, 12, 4, 249–269.
23.
ChurchillG.A.Jr (1979), A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs, Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 1, 64–73.
24.
ComreyA. (1970), Manual for the Comrey personality scales, San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
25.
CostaP.T.Jr.McCraeR.R. (1992), Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual, Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
De RaadB.SzirmackZ. (1994), The search for the big five in a non-Indo-European language: the Hungarian trait structure and its relationship to the EPQ and the PTS, European Review of Applied Psychology, 44, 1, 17–24.
28.
De RaadB.PeruginiM.HrebickovaM.SzarotaP. (1998), Lingua franca of personality: taxonomies and structures based on the psycho-lexical approach, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 1, 212–232.
29.
DigmanJ.M. (1990), Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model, Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.
30.
DigmanJ.M. (1997), Higher-order factors of the big five, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 6, 1246–1256.
31.
DobniD.ZinkhanG.M. (1990), In search of brand image: a foundation analysis, Advances in Consumer Research, éds. GoldbergGornPollay, 17, 110–119.
32.
EysenckH.J. (1960), The structure of human personality, London: Methuen.
33.
FerrandiJ.-M. (1994), Les effets de la culture sur le comportement du consommateur: complexité du concept et limites de la mesure, Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion, Université de Nice.
34.
FerrandiJ.-M.Fine-FalcyS.Valette-FlorenceP. (1999), L'échelle de personnalité des marques d'Aaker appliquée au contexte français: un premier test, Actes du Congrès de l'Association Française de Marketing, Strasbourg, 15, 1089–1112.
35.
FerrandiJ.-MValette-FlorenceP.Fine-FalcyS. (2000), Aaker's brand personality scale in a French context: a replication and a preliminary test of its validity, Developments In Marketing Science, éds. SpottsMeadow, Academy of Marketing Science, 23, 7–13.
36.
FornellC.LarckerD.F. (1981), Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1, 39–50.
37.
FournierS. (1998), Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research, Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 4, 343–373.
38.
FunderD.C. (2001), Personality, Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197–221.
GoldbergL.R. (1990), An alternative description of personality: the big five-factor structure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 6, 1216–1229.
41.
GoldbergL.R. (1992), The development of markers for the big-five factor structure, Psychological Assessment, 4, 1, 26–42.
42.
HofsteeW.K.B.De RaadB.GoldbergL.R. (1992), Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 1, 146–163.
43.
HofsteeW.K.KiersH.A.De RaadB.GoldbergL.R.OstendorfF. (1997), A comparison of big five structures of personality traits in Dutch, English and German, European Journal of Personality, 11, 1, 15–31.
44.
HoganR. (1986), Hogan personality inventory manual, National Computer System, Minneapolis.
45.
HuberF.HerrmannA.BraunsteinC. (2000), The brand personality as a determinant of brand loyalty — findings of an empirical study in the automobile sector, Developments In Marketing Science, éds. SpottsMeadow, Academy of Marketing Science, 23, 340–346.
46.
JohnO.P. (1990), The big five factor taxonomy: dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires, Handbook of personality: theory and research, éd. Pervin., New York: Guilford Press, 66–100.
47.
JohnO.P.AngleitnerA.OstendorfF. (1988), The lexical approach to personality: a historical review of trait taxonomic research, European Journal of Personality, 2, 3, 171–203.
48.
JöreskogK.G. (1971), Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests, Psychometrika, 36, 2, 109–133.
49.
KellerK.L. (1993), Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity, Journal of Marketing, 57, 1, 1–22.
50.
KleineS.S.KleineR.E.IIIAllenC.T. (1995), How is a possession me or not me? Characterizing types and an antecedent of material possession attachment, Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 3, 327–343.
51.
KoëbelM.N.LadweinR. (1999), L'échelle de personnalité de la marque de Jennifer Aaker: adaptation au contexte français, Décisions Marketing, 16, 81–88.
52.
LevyS.J. (1959), Symbols for sale, Harvard Business Review, juillet-août, 117–124.
53.
MalhotraN.K. (1988), Self-concept and product choice: an integrated perspective, Journal of Economic Psychology, 9, 1, 1–28.
54.
MarchettiR.UsunierJ.-C. (1990), Les problèmes de l'étude de marché dans un contexte interculturel, Revue Française de Marketing, 130, 5–17.
55.
MartineauP. (1958), The personality of the retail store, Harvard Business Review, 36, 47–55.
56.
McAdamsD.P. (1992), The five-factor model in personality: a critical appraisal, Journal of Personality, 60, 2, 329–361.
57.
McCrackenG. (1988), Culture and consumption: new approaches to the symbolic character of consumer goods and activities, Bloomington et Indianapolis, Indiana University Press.
58.
McCrackenG. (1989), Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process, Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 3, 310–321.
59.
McCraeR.R. (2000), Trait psychology and the revival of personality and culture studies, American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 1, 10–31.
60.
McCraeR.R. (2001), Trait psychology and culture: exploring intercultural comparisons, Journal of Personality, 69, 6, 819–846.
61.
McCraeR.R.CostaP.T.JrDel PilarG.H.RollandJ.P.ParkerW.D. (1998), Cross-cultural assessment of the five-factor model: the revisited Neo personality inventory, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 1, 171–188.
62.
McCraeR.RCostaP.T.Jr. (1997), Personality trait structure as a human universal, American Psychologist, 52, 5, 509–516.
63.
McCraeR.R.JohnO.P. (1992), Introduction to the five-factor model and its applications, Journal of Personality, 60, 2, 175–215.
64.
McCraeR.RZondermanA.B.CostaP.T.Jr.BondM.H.PaunomenS.V. (1996), Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised Neo personality inventory: confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 3, 552–566.
65.
McEnallyM.De ChernatoryL. (1999), The evolving nature of branding: consumer and managerial considerations, Journal of Consumer and Market Research, 99, 02.
66.
MeulmanJ.J. (1996), Fitting a distance model to homogeneous subsets of variables: points of view analysis of categorical data, Journal of Classification, 13, 2, 249–266.
67.
NormanW.T. (1963), Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.
68.
ParkB. (1986), A method for studying the development of impressions of real people, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 3, 447–456.
PlummerJ.T. (1984), How Personality makes a difference, Journal of Advertising Research, 24, 27–31.
71.
PrenticeD.A. (1987), Psychological correspondence of possessions, attitudes and values, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 6, 993–1003.
72.
RoehrichG. (1993), Les consommateurs — innovateurs: un essai d'identification, Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion, Grenoble: Ecole Supérieure des Affaires, Université Pierre-Mendès-France.
73.
RollandJ.P.ParkerW.D.StumpfH. (1998), A psychometric examination of the French translations of the NEO-PI-R and NEO-FI, Journal of Personality Assessment, 71, 2, 269–291.
74.
SaucierG. (1994), Mini-markers: a brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers, Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 3, 506–516.
75.
SchneiderD.J. (1991), Social cognition, Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 527–561.
76.
SiguawJ.A.MattilaA.AustinJ.R. (1999), The brand personality scale: an application for restaurants, Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 48–55.
77.
SirgyM.J. (1982), Self-concept in consumer behavior: a critical review, Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 3, 287–300.
78.
SnyderM.GangestadS. (1986), On the nature of self-monitoring: matters of assessment, matters of validity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1, 125–139.
79.
TupesE.C.ChristalR.E. (1992), Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings, Journal of Personality, 60, 2, 225–251. (réédition de leur étude publiée en 1961).
80.
Van Der BurgE.De LeeuwJ.VerdegaalR. (1988), Homogeneity analysis with k sets of variables: an alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features, Psychometrika, 53, 2, 177–197.
81.
WigginsJ.S.TrapnellP.D. (1997), Personality structure: the return of the big five, Handbook of personality psychology, éds. HoganJohnsonBriggs, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 737–765.
