Drawing on the ethnographic work conducted inside the digital platform WeChat, this article contributes to the ongoing discussion about the multi-sited ethnographic tools and the digital methods available for investigating virtual worlds and online practices. It analyses the communications, interactions, sociality, and economic activities produced on the application WeChat by Chinese migrant women, together with the same practices constructed offline in Taiwan. Taking a close look at the offline context from which these digital practices are generated, the article shows that when studying online practices, it is essential to understand what corresponds to them in the offline worlds. By updating the four Goffmanian interactionist fieldwork sequences, this research provides some reflections on the necessity to mix and merge online and offline ethnographic techniques in order to apprehend the new practices and scales of interaction at the crossroads where online and offline social spaces intersect. Virtual ethnography cannot be exclusive. Rather, it needs to be designed and performed in dialogue with ‘physical’ observations.
AugéM (1992) Non-Places. Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. London and New York: Verso.
2.
BeaulieuA (2004) Mediating ethnography: Objectivity and the making of ethnographies of the internet. Journal of Social Epistemology2: 139–163.
3.
BertauxD (2003) Les récits de vie. Paris: Nathan.
4.
BengtssonS (2014) Faraway, so close! Proximity and distance in ethnography online. Media, Culture and Society36(6): 862–877.
5.
BoellstorffT (2012) Rethinking digital anthropology. In: MillerDHorstH (eds) Digital Anthropology. London: Berg, 39–60
6.
BoellstorffT (2010) A Typology of Ethnographic Scales for Virtual Worlds. In Online Worlds: Convergence of the Real and the Virtual. Springer: London, 123–133
7.
CalhounC (2017) A cosmopolitanism of connections. In: RobbinsBHortaPL (eds) New Cosmopolitanisms. New York: New York University Press, 189–200.
8.
CandeaM (2009) Arbitrary location: In defense of the bounded field-site. In: FalzonMA (ed.) Multi-sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research. Malta: University of Malta Press, 1–35.
9.
CarolusABinderJMuenchRSchmidtCSchneiderFBuglassSL (2019) Smartphones as digital companions: Characterizing the relationship between users and their phones. New Media & Society21(4): 914–938.
10.
CliffordJ (1980) The Predicament of Culture. Twentieth Century Ethnography, Literature and Art. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
11.
DaiMRobbinsR (2021) Exploring the influences of profile perceptions and different pick-up lines on dating outcomes on tinder: An online experiment. Computers in Human Behavior117. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106667
12.
DavidGCambreC (2016) Screened intimacies: Tinder and the swipe logic. Social Media & Society. doi: 10.1177/2056305116641976
13.
DiminescuD (2008) The connected migrant: An epistemological manifesto. Social Science Information47(4): 565–579.
14.
FalzonMA (2009) Introduction. Multi-sited ethnography. In: FalzonMA (ed.) Multi-sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research. Malta: University of Malta Press, 1–11.
15.
FuchsC (2014) Social Media. A Critical Introduction. London: Sage.
16.
GarciaCAStandleeAICuiY (2009) Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography38(1): 52–84.
17.
GeertzC (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
18.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick and London Aldine Transaction.
19.
GoffmanE (1989) On fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography18(2): 123–132.
20.
GoffmanE (1982) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.
21.
GoffmanE (1963) Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London: Penguin Books.
22.
GoffmanE (1958) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books
23.
HamptonKN (2015) Persistent and pervasive community: New communication technologies and the future of community. American Behavioral Scientist60(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215601714
24.
HineC (2015) Ethnography for the Internet. Embedded, Embodied and EveryDay. London: Bloomsbury.
25.
HineC (2017) From virtual ethnography to the embedded, embodies, everyday internet. In: HjorthLHorstHGallowayABellG (eds) The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography. London: Routledge, 21–28.
26.
KozinetsRVArnouldEJ (2017) Ruminations on the current state of consumer ethnography. In: HalkierBKellerM (eds) Routledge Handbook on Consumption. London: Routledge, 57–69.
27.
KozinetsRV (2020) Netnography. Doing Ethnographic Research Online. New York: SAGE.
28.
LambrechtM (2016) L’économie des plateformes collaboratives. Courrier Hebdomadaire du CRISP26/27: 5–80.
29.
LeanderKMMcKimKK (2003) Tracing the everyday ‘sitings’ of adolescents on the internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication & Information3(2): 211–240. doi: 10.1080/14636310303140
30.
LingR (2008) New Tech, New Ties: How Mobile Communication is Reshaping Social Cohesion. Cambridge, M: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
31.
LockMFarquharJ (2007) Beyond the Body Proper: Reading the Anthropology of Material Life. Durham: Duke University Press.
32.
MadianouM (2019) The biometric assemblage: Surveillance, experimentation, profit, and the measuring of refugee bodies. Television & New Media20(6): 581–599.
33.
MarcusGE (1998) Ethnography Through Thick and Thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34.
MarcusGE (1995) Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology24: 95–117.
35.
MillerDSlaterD (2001) The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. London: Berg.
36.
MilgramS (1972) The familiar stranger: An aspect of urban anonymity. The Division 8 Newsletter, Division of Personality and Social Psychology. Washington: American Psychological Association.
37.
MurthyD (2008) Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology42(5): 837–855. doi: 10.1177/0038038508094565
38.
Olivier de SardanJ-P (1995) Anthropologie et développement. Essai en socio-anthropologie du changement social. Paris: Apad-Khartala.
39.
PertierraAC (2018) Media Anthropology for the Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
40.
PinchT (2010) The invisible technologies of Goffman’s sociology. From the merry-go-round to the internet. Technology and Culture51(2): 409–424. doi: 10.1353/tech.0.0456
41.
PinkS (2016) Experience. In: KubitschkoSKaunA, Innovative Methods in Media Communication Research. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 161–165.
42.
PinkSHorstJPostillJHjorthLLewisTTacchiJ (2016) Digital Ethnography. Principles and Practice. London: Sage.
43.
PostillJPinkS (2012) Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia145(1): 123–134.
44.
PonzanesiS (2019) Migration and mobility in the digital age: (Re)Mapping connectivity and belonging. Television and New Media20(6): 547–557.
45.
PrzybylskiL (2020) Hybrid Ethnography: Online, Offline and In-between. New York: SAGE.
46.
RobinsonLSchultzJ (2009) New avenues for sociological inquiry: Evolving forms of ethnographic practice. Sociology43(4): 685–698.
47.
Roulleau-BergerL (2004) Voir, ‘savoir-être avec’, rendre public: pour une ethnographie de la reconnaissance. Cahiers internationaux de la sociologie117(2): 261–283.
48.
SchatzmanLStraussA (1973) Field Research: Strategies for a Natural Sociology. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
49.
SchwartzHJacobsJ (1979) Qualitative Sociology. A Method to the Madness. New York: Free Press.
50.
van DijckJ (2013) The Culture of Connectivity. A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
WangXGuB (2016) The communication design of WeChat: Ideological as well as technical aspects of social media. Communication Design Quarterly4(1): 23–35. doi: 10.1145/2875501.2875503
52.
WeiRLoVH (2006) Staying connected while on the move: Cell phone use and social connectedness. New Media & Society8(1): 53–72.
53.
XieZ (2018) Im/materializing cross-border mobility: A study of mainland China–Hong Kong Daigou (Cross-border shopping services on global consumer goods). International Journal of Communication12: 4052–4065.
54.
ZaniB (2018) Gendered transnational ties and multipolar economies: Chinese migrant women WeChat commerce in Taiwan. International Migration57(4): 232–246. doi: 10.1111/imig.12526
55.
ZaniB (2020) WeChat, we sell, we feel: Chinese migrant women’s emotional petit capitalism. International Journal of Cultural Studies23(5): 803–820. doi: 10.1177/1367877920923360
56.
ZaniB (2021) Pattes de poulet, colis cachés, entrepreneuses connectées. Migration et entrepreneuriat digital entre la Chine et Taiwan. Sociologie du travail63(3).
57.
ZhaoX (2020) Digital labour in transnational mobility: Chinese international students’ online boundary work in Daigou. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444820934096
