This article describes and discusses the new generation of methodological responses to measuring democracy and related issues generated by Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem). V-Dem is distinct in several regards in addition to its unique level of disaggregation, by the combination of: historical data extending back to 1900 and for a large selection among them to 1789 for many countries in the world; use of multiple, independent coders for each evaluative question; inter-coder reliability tests incorporated into a custom designed Bayesian item-response theory measurement model; provision of confidence bounds for all point estimates associated with expert-coded questions as well as for all indices; multiple indices reflecting varying theories of democracy; fully transparent aggregation procedures; and that all data are made freely available, including original coder-level judgments (exclusive of any personal identifying information).
BernhardMTzelgovEJungD-JCoppedgeMLindbergSI (2015) The Varieties of Democracy Core Civil Society Index. University of Gothenburg, Varieties of Democracy Institute: V-Dem Working Paper Series12.
2.
BernhardMReenockCNordstromT (2004) The Legacy of Western Overseas Colonialism on Democratic Survival. International Studies Quarterly48(3): 225–250.
3.
Bertelsmann Stiftung (various years) Bertelsmann Transformation Index [2003–]: Towards Democracy and a Market Economy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
4.
BollenKAPaxtonP (2000) Subjective Measures of Liberal Democracy. Comparative Political Studies33(1): 58–86.
5.
BoixCMillerMRosatoS (2013) A Complete Dataset of Political Regimes, 1800-2007. Comparative Political Studies46(12): 1523–1554.
6.
CheibubJAGandhiJVreelandJR (2010) Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited. Public Choice143(1-2): 67–101.
7.
ClintonJDLewisD (2008) Expert Opinion, Agency Characteristics, and Agency Preferences. Political Analysis16(1): 3–20.
8.
ClintonJDLapinskiJS (2006) Measuring Legislative Accomplishment, 1877-1994. American Journal of Political Science50(1): 232–249.
9.
CoppedgeMAlvarezAMaldonadoC (2008) Two Persistent Dimensions of Democracy: Contestation and Inclusiveness. Journal of Politics70(3): 335–350.
10.
CoppedgeMLindbergSISkaaningS-ETeorellJ (2016) Measuring High Level Democratic Principles Using the V-Dem Data. International Political Science Review37(5): 580–593.
11.
CoppedgeMGerringJLindbergSISkaaningS-ETeorellJ (2017) Comparisons and Contrasts. University of Gothenburg, Varieties of Democracy Institute: V-Dem Working Paper Series45.
CoppedgeMGerringJLindbergSISkaaningS-ETeorellJ (2015) V-Dem Codebook v5. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
14.
CoppedgeMGerringJLindbergSISkaaningS-ETeorellJAnderssonFMarquardtKMechkovaVMiriFPemsteinDPernesJStepanovaNTzelgovEWangY-T (2015) V-Dem Methodology v5. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
15.
CoppedgeMGerringJLindbergSISkaaningS-ETeorellJCiobanuV (2015) V-Dem Country Coding Units v5. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
16.
CoppedgeMGerringJLindbergSISkaaningS-ETeorellJAnderssonFMechkovaVPernesJStepanovaN (2015) V-Dem Organization and Management v5. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
17.
CoppedgeMGerringJLindbergSISkaaningS-ETeorellJ (2015) V-Dem Comparisons and Contrasts with Other Measurement Projects. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
18.
DahlRA (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
19.
DahlRA (1989) Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
20.
FoxJ-P (2010) Bayesian Item Response Modeling: Theory and Applications. New York: Springer.
GallieWB (1956) Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society56: 167–220.
23.
HeldD (2006) Models of Democracy, 3d ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
24.
JackmanS (2004) What Do We Learn from Graduate Admissions Committees? A Multiple Rater, Latent Variable Model, with Incomplete Discrete and Continuous Indicators. Political Analysis12(4): 400–424.
25.
JohnsonVEAlbertJH (1999) Ordinal Data Modeling. New York: Springer.
LindbergSICoppedgeMGerringJTeorellJ (2014) A New Way to Measuring Democracy. Journal of Democracy25(3): 159–169.
28.
LordFMNovickM (1968) Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29.
MarquardtKLPemsteinD (2018) IRT models for expert-coded panel data. Political Analysis, 26(4): 431–456.
30.
McMannK (2016) Measuring Subnational Democracy. University of Gothenburg, Varieties of Democracy Institute: V-Dem Working Paper Series26.
31.
McMannKPemsteinDSeimBTeorellJLindbergSI (2016) Strategies of Validation: Assessing the Varieties of Democracy Corruption Data. University of Gothenburg, Varieties of Democracy Institute: V-Dem Working Paper Series23.
32.
MerkelW (2004) Embedded and Defective Democracies. Democratization11(5): 33–58.
33.
NunnN (2009) The Importance of History for Economic Development. Annual Review of Economics1(1): 1–28.
34.
PatzRJJunkerBWJohnsonMSMarianoLT (2002) The Hierarchical Rater Model for Rated Test Items and its Application to Large-Scale Educational Assessment Data. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics27(4): 341–384.
35.
PemsteinDMarquardtKLTzelgovEWangY-TKrusellJMiriJ (2017) The V-Dem Measurement Model: Latent Variable Analysis for Cross-National and Cross-Temporal Expert-Coded Data. University of Gothenburg, Varieties of Democracy Institute: V-Dem Working Paper Series21, 2nd edition.
36.
PemsteinDTzelgovEWangY-T (2015) Evaluating and Improving Item Response Theory Models for Cross-National Expert Surveys. V-Dem Working Paper series1: 1–53.
37.
PemsteinDSeimBLindbergSI (2016) Anchoring Vignettes and Item Response Theory in Cross-National Expert Surveys. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Philadelphia.
38.
PemsteinDMeserveSMeltonJ (2010) Democratic Compromise: A Latent Variable Analysis of Ten Measures of Regime Type. Political Analysis 18(4): 426–449. Polity Project, www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html
39.
SartoriG (1970) Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review64(4): 1033–1053.
40.
ShapiroI (2003) The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
41.
SigmanRLindbergSI (2015) The Index of Egalitarian Democracy and Its Components: V-Dem’s Conceptualization and Measurement. University of Gothenburg, Varieties of Democracy Institute: V-Dem Working Papers SeriesNo. 21.
42.
SkaaningS-EGerringJBartusevičiusH (2015) A Lexical Index of Electoral Democracy. Comparative Political Studies48(12): 1491–1525.
43.
TeorellJCoppedgeMGerringJLindbergSIn.d. (2016) Measuring Electoral Democracy with V-Dem Data: Introducing a New Polyarchy Index. University of Gothenburg, Varieties of Democracy Institute: V-Dem Working Papers Series25.
44.
TeorellJSigmanRLindbergSIn.d. (2016) V-Dem Indices: Rationale and Aggregations. University of Gothenburg, Varieties of Democracy Institute: V-Dem Working Papers Series22.
45.
TreierSJackmanS (2008) Democracy as a Latent Variable. American Journal of Political Science52(1): 201–217.
46.
VanhanenT (2000) A New Dataset for Measuring Democracy, 1810–1998. Journal of Peace Research37(2): 251–265.
