Case study is a common methodology in the social sciences (management, psychology, science of education, political science, sociology). A lot of methodological papers have been dedicated to case study but, paradoxically, the question “what is a case?” has been less studied. Hence the fact that researchers conducting a case study are sometimes surprised by what they are experiencing. The paper deals with the problem: Why is a real case study more puzzling than expected, having read the literature on case study? We assume that the answer lies in a paradox: despite what is suggested by the double singular “case study”, a case study requires a comparative approach. This paper addresses the three fundamental issues one must tackle when doing a case study: What is my case a case of? What is the stuff that my case is made of? What can my case do? (or what do cases do?)
AbbottA (1992) What do Cases do? Some Notes on Activity in Sociological Analysis. In: RaginCCBeckerHS (1992) What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53–82.
2.
AbbottA (2003) La description face à la temporalité. In: BlundoGOlivier de SardanJP (eds) (2003) Pratiques de la description. Paris: Éditions de l’EHESS, 41–53.
3.
AbbottA (2004) Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
4.
AlisedaA (2006) What is Abduction? Overview and Proposal for Investigation. In: AlisedaA, Abductive Reasoning. Logical Investigation into Discovery and Explanation. Dordrecht: Springer, 27–50.
5.
BamfordG (1993) Popper’s Explications of Ad Hocness: Circularity, Empirical Content, and Scientific Practice. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science44(2): 335–55.
6.
BerghAE (1905) The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, vol. VI. Washington DC: The Jefferson Memorial Association.
7.
DepeyreCDumezH (2007) La théorie en sciences sociales et la notion de mécanisme - A propos de Social Mechanisms. Libellio d’Aegis3(2): 21–24.
8.
DuboisAGaddeLE (2002) Systematic Combining: An Abductive Approach to Case Research. Journal of Business Research55(7): 553–60.
9.
DumezH (2010) La description - Point aveugle de la recherche qualitative. Libellio d’Aegis6(2): 28–43.
10.
DumezH (2011a) Qu’est-ce qu’un concept ?Libellio d’Aegis7(1): 67–79 (Supplément: Les concepts en gestion - Création, définition, redéfinition).
11.
DumezH (2011b) “L’Actor-Network-Theory (ANT) comme technologie de la description.”Libellio d’Aegis7(4): 27–38.
DumezHRigaudE (2008) Comment passer du matériau de recherche à l’analyse théorique – A propos de la notion de template. Libellio d’Aegis4(2): 40–46.
14.
EcksteinH (1973) Case Study and Theory in Political Science. In: GreensteinFIPolsbyNW (eds) Handbook of Political Science. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley, 79–137.
15.
EliasN (1994) Mozart, The Sociology of a Genious. New York: Polity.
16.
FannKT (1970) Peirce’s Theory of Abduction., The Hague: Martinus Nijhof.
17.
FlickU (2009) An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications, fourth edition.
18.
GeorgeALBennettA (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
19.
GerhardtU (1994) The Use of Weberian Ideal-type Methodology in Qualitative Data Interpretation: An Outline for Ideal-type Analysis. Bulletin de méthodologie sociologique45: 74–126.
20.
GerringJ (2004) What is a Case Study and What is it Good for?American Political Science Review98(2): 341–54.
21.
GlaserBStraussA (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick NJ: Aldine Transaction.
22.
HedströmPSwedbergR (eds) (1998) Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
HedströmPBearmanP (2009) The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
HektnerJMSchmidtJACsikszentmihalyiM (eds) (2006) Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
25.
HerreidCF (1997) What is a Case ? Bringing to Science Education the Established Teaching Tool of Law and Medicine. Journal of College Science Teaching27(2): 92–94.
26.
HullDL (1975) Central Subjects and Historical Narratives. History and Theory14: 253–74.
27.
JickTD (1979) Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. Administrative Science Quarterly24(4): 602–11.
28.
KoenigG (2009) L’étude de cas à visée infirmationniste. Libellio d’Aegis5(4): 7–13.
29.
KuckartzU (1991) Ideal-types or Empirical Types: The Case of Max Weber’s Empirical Research. Bulletin de méthodologie sociologique31: 44–53.
30.
LijphartA (1971) Comparative Politics and the Comparative Methods. American Political Science Review65(3): 682–93.
31.
LockeRMThelenK (1995) Apples and Oranges Revisited: Contextualized Comparisons and the Study of Comparative Labor Politics. Politics and Society23(3): 337–67.
32.
LoescherSM (1959) Imperfect Collusion in the Cement Industry. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
McKeownT (1998) Why is a Single Case so Important?APSA-Comparative Politics Newsletter9(1): 12–15.
34.
PasseronJCRevelJ (eds) (2005) Penser par cas. Paris: Éditions de l’EHESS.
35.
PettigrewA (1990) Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice. Organization Science1(3): 267–92.
36.
PopperK (2002) The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge.
37.
RaginC (1992) Introduction: Cases of ‘What is a Case?’ In: RaginCCBeckerHS (1992) What is a case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–17.
38.
RaginCCBeckerHS (1992) What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
SacksH (1963) Sociological Description. Berkeley Journal of Sociology8: 1–16.
40.
Van MeterKMde VriesMWKaplanCDDijkmanCIM (1987) States, Syndromes, and Polythetic Classes: The Operationalization of Cross-classification Analysis in Behavorial Science Research. Bulletin de méthodologie sociologique15: 22–38.
41.
WhyteWF (1984) Learning from the Field: A Guide from Experience. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Publictions.
