It is argued in studies in which open-ended questions are used that the choice is not between human or machine coding. It is the position the investigator takes with regard to the coding process that is relevant: from whose perspective is the coding performed? This choice determines whether human or machine coding can be performed. The results one obtains when these approaches are used can be very different.
ConversePE (1964) The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. Ideology and Discontent. In ApterDE (ed.) Ideology and Discontent. New York: The Free Press: 206–61.
4.
CrittendenKSHillRJ (1971) Coding Reliability and Validity of Interview Data. American Sociological Review36(6): 1073–80.
5.
FrisbieBSudmanS (1968) The Use of Computers in Coding Free Responses. Public Opinion Quarterly32(2): 216–32.
6.
GottschalkLA (1997) The Unobtrusive Measurement of Psychological States and Traits. In RobertsCW (ed.) Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences from Texts and Transcripts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 117–25.
7.
GottschalkLAHausmannCBrownJS (1975) A Computerized Scoring System for Use with Content Analysis. Comprehensive Psychiatry16(1): 77–90.
8.
KammeyerKCWRothJA (1971) Coding Responses to Open-ended Questions. In CostnerHL (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1971. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 60–78.
9.
MontgomeryACCrittendenKS (1977) Improving Coding Reliability for Open-ended Questions. Public Opinion Quarterly41(2): 235–43.
10.
OsgoodCE (1959) The Representational Model and Relevant Research Methods. In De Sola PoolI (ed.) Trends in Content Analysis. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 33–88.
11.
PoppingR (2010) Ag09-A Computer Program for Interrater Agreement for Judgments. Social Science Computer Review28(3): 391–96.
12.
PoppingRRobertsCW (2009) Coding Issues in Semantic Text Analysis. Field Methods21(3): 244–64.
13.
RobertsCWPoppingR (1996) Themes, Syntax, and Other Necessary Steps in the Network Analysis of Texts. Social Science Information35(4): 657–65.
14.
ScottWA (1955) Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding. Public Opinion Quarterly19(3): 321–25.
15.
ShapiroG (1997) The Future of Coders: Human Judgments in a World of Sophisticated Software. In RobertsCW (ed.) Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences from Texts and Transcripts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 225–38.
