Developing clearly written, scientifically valid, and flexible practice guidelines can aid in cost containment and in the resolution of medical malpractice litigation. Practice guidelines should keep in mind both clinicians and patients and should focus on specific clinical circumstances. Deviation from the guidelines should be supported by peer-reviewed medical literature. These guidelines, if properly researched and prepared, may serve as the standard of care.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Institute of medicine. In FieldMJLohrKN, (eds.), Guidelines for Clinical Practice: From Development to Use. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press, 1992, p. 27–41.
2.
ShapiroDWLaskerRDBindmanAB: Containing costs while improving quality of care: The role of profiling and practice guidelines. Ann Rev Public Health1993;14:219–238.
3.
PaulyMV: Practice guidelines: Can they save money? Should they?J Law Med Ethics1995;23:65–82.
4.
HavighurstCC: Practice guidelines as legal standards governing physician liability. Law Contemp Prob1991;54:87–94.
5.
HirshfeldEB: Should practice parameters be the standard of care in malpractice litigation?JAMA1991; 266:2886–2891.
6.
HyamsALBrandenburgJALipsitzSR: Practice guidelines and malpractice litigation: A two-way street. Ann Intern Med1995;122:450–455.
