A technique for stacking polyurethane breast implants is discussed in this report. A second prostheses was put into a virgin pocket to protect and stabilize the preexisting implant. The advantages and disadvantages of this technique are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HesterTRNahaiFBostwickJCukicJ: A 5-year experience with polyurethane covered mammary prosthesis for treatment of capsular contracture, primary augmentation mammoplasty and breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg1988;2:135.
2.
ShapiroMD: Smooth vs. rough: An 8-year survey of mammary prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg1989;84: 449.
3.
VasconezHC: Polyurethane covered implants and permanent tissue expanders for immediate reconstruction. In VasconezLOLejourMGamboa-Boba-DillaM, (eds.), Atlas of Breast Reconstruction. New York, New York, Gower Medical Publishing, 1991.
4.
MentorH/S: Siltex and Smooth-Surface Saline-Filled Mammary Prostheses, Product Insert Data Sheet, June, 1995, p. 16.
5.
HesterTR: The polyurethane covered mammary prosthesis: Facts and fiction. Perspect Plast Surg1988;L-135.
6.
SvahnJK: Outcome of mammary prosthesis explantation: A patient perspective. Ann Plast Surg1996; 36 (6):594–600.
7.
WagnerHBellerFRPfautschM: Electron and light microscopy examination of capsules around breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg1977;60:49.
8.
SlavinSA: Silicone gel implant explantation: Reasons, results, and admonitions. Plast Reconstr Surg1995;95:63.
