Comparison of the Conventional and the Ultrasound Methods of Liposuction

Abstract

This article compares the results of the ultrasound and the conventional methods of liposuction and tries to determine the advantages of the ultrasound method. In comparison to the conventional method, ultrasound liposuction shows much better results in saddlebags, the abdominal wall, and the buttocks. The treatment of cellulite with ultrasound liposuction has proved to be more successful and the lift effect of the skin remains 4–6 months longer than with conventional liposuction. On the other hand, the long-term results do not show any significant differences between the two methods; we have observed equal results from both techniques after six months. Ultrasound liposuction at the knees, inner thighs, arms, and ankles has proven not to be very successful. The advantages of the ultrasound method are less pain, less bruising, less blood in the aspirate, and a short recovery time. The disadvantages are the very high expenses and the impossibility of using the aspirated fat again.