Ten years ago, most liposuction cases were performed under general anesthesia using the “dry technique.” In recent years, liposuction under local anesthesia using the “tumescent technique” has led to extremely safe liposuction with rapid postoperative recovery.
OttaniFFournierP: A history and comparison of suction techniques until their debut in North America. In HetterG (ed.). Liploplasty: The theory and practice of blunt suction lipectomy. Boston: Little, Brown, 1984. Pp. 19–23.
3.
LillisPJ: The tumescent technique for liposuction surgery, Dermatol Clin8:439, 1990.
4.
CourtissEChoucairRDonelanM: Large-volume suction lipectomy: an analysis of 108 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg89:1068, 1992.
5.
ColemanWPIII. New trends in liposuction. In RoenigkRRoenigkH (eds.) New Trends in Dermatologic Surgery. M Dunitz, London (in press).
6.
DolskyR: Spoke–wheel liposuction technique. Am J Cosm Surg3:29–31, 1984.
7.
FournierP: Liposculpture: My technique. Paris: Arnette, 1989.
8.
KleinJA: The tumescent technique for liposuction surgery. Am J Cosm Surg4:263, 1987.
9.
KleinJ: The tumescent technique. Anesthesia and modified liposuction technique. Dermatol Clin8:425, 1990.
10.
ColemanWPIIIBadameAPhillipsH: A new technique for injection of tumescent anesthetic mixtures. J Dermatol Surg Oncol17:535, 1991.
11.
KleinJ: Liposuction by the tumescent technique (Video). Jeff Klein Surgical, Inc.San Clemente, CA1990.
12.
HankeCWLeeMBernsteinG: The safety of dermatologic liposuction surgery. Dermatol Clin8:563, 1990.
13.
ASPRS Ad Hoc Committee on New Procedure: Five Year Updated Evaluation of Suction-Assisted Lipectomy. Chicago: American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. September 30, 1987.
14.
TeimourianB: Complications associated with suction lipectomy. Clin Plast Surg16:385–394, 1989.