FergusonT. What e-patients do online: A tentative taxonomy. The Ferguson Report August 2002, No. 9. Available at: http://www.fergusonreport.com/archives/. Accessed August 10, 2003.
2.
KatzMHSchroederSA. The sounds of the hospital. Paging patterns in three teaching hospitals. N Engl J Med.1988;319(24):1585–1589.
3.
BorowitzSMWyattJC. The origin, content, and workload of e-mail consultations. JAMA. 1998;280(15):1321–1324.
4.
MoyerCASternDTDobiasKSCoxDTKatzSJ. Bridging the electronic divide: Patient and provider perspective on e-mail communication in primary care. Am J Manage Care. 2002;8(5):427–433.
5.
ConklinCB. Risk management ramifications of e-mail in a hospital. Forum. 1998; September:8–9.
6.
SpielbergAR. On call and online: Sociohistorical, legal, and ethical implications of e-mail for the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1998;280(15): 1353–1359.
7.
Smith v Pillsbury Co, 914 F Supp 97 (ED Pa 1996).
8.
KatzBSandsDZ. Guidelines for the clinical use of electronic mail. J Am Inf Assoc.1998;5:104–111.
9.
SandsDZ. Guidelines for the use of patient-centered e-mail. Massachusetts Health Data Consortium, 1999. Available at: http://www.mahealthdata.org/. Accessed August 18, 2003.
MandlKDKohaneISBrandtAM. Electronic patient-physician communications: Problems and promise. Ann Intern Med.1998;129(6):495–500.
12.
American Medical Association.Guidelines for physician-patient electronic communications. Last updated August 27, 2002. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/printcat/2386.html. Accessed August 17, 2003.
13.
eRisk Working Group on Healthcare's Guidelines for Online Communications. Available at: http://www.medem.com/phy/phy-eriskguidelines.cfm. Working Group for Healthcare. Accessed November 15, 2002.
14.
Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information, 65 Fr 82462 (2001).
15.
Public Welfare: Department of Health and Human Services. 45 CFR §160–164.
16.
Administrative Simplification, Public Law 104–191 (1996).
17.
Standards for Electronic Transactions, 65FR50312 (2000).
