Cosmetic blepharoplasty presents a significant challenge to surgeons, as patient expectations tend to be very high. A sophisticated understanding of the normal topography of the eyelid and periorbital anatomy as well as patient desires and expectations are crucial to achieve the best results for both surgeon and patient.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LemkeBN, StasiorOG. The anatomy of eyebrow ptosis. Arch Ophthalmol.1982;100:981–986.
2.
MeyerDR, LinbergJV, WobigJL, Anatomy of the orbital septum and associated eyelid connective tissues. Implications for ptosis surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg.1991;7:104–113.
3.
CastanaresS.Blepharoplasty for herniated intraorbital fat: Anatomical basis for a new approach. Plast Reconstr Surg.1951;8:46–58.
LockwoodCB. The anatomy of the muscles, ligaments, and fasciae of the orbit, including an account of the capsule of Tenon, the check ligament of the recti, and the suspensory ligament of the eye. J Anat Physiol1886;20:1.
6.
HawesMJ, DortzbachRK. The microscopic anatomy of the lower eyelid retractors. Arch Ophthalmol.1982;100:1313–1338.
7.
MitzV, PeyronieM.The superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg.1976;58:80–85.
8.
MuzaffarAR, MendelsonBC, WilliamPJr.Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments of the lower lid and lateral canthus. Plast Reconstr Surg.2002;110:873–911.
9.
KikkawaDO, LemkeBN, DortzbachRK. Relations of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system to the orbit and characterization of the orbitomalar ligament. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg.1996;12:77–88.
10.
LucarelliMJ, KhwargSI, LemkeBN. The anatomy of midfacial ptosis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg.2000;16:7–22.
