Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN)—the locus of the master circadian clock— transcriptional regulation via the CREB/CRE pathway is implicated in the functioning of the molecular clock timing process, and is a key conduit through which photic input entrains the oscillator. One event driving CRE-mediated transcription is the phosphorylation of CREB at serine 133 (Ser¹³³). Indeed, numerous reporter gene assays have shown that an alanine point mutation in Ser¹³³ reduces CREB-mediated transcription. Here, we sought to examine the contribution of Ser¹³³ phosphorylation to the functional role of CREB in SCN clock physiology in vivo. To this end, we used a CREB knock-in mouse strain, in which Ser¹³³ was mutated to alanine (S/A CREB). Under a standard 12 h light-dark cycle, S/A CREB mice exhibited a marked alteration in clock-regulated wheel running activity. Relative to WT mice, S/A CREB mice had highly fragmented bouts of locomotor activity during the night phase, elevated daytime activity, and a delayed phase angle of entrainment. Further, under free-running conditions, S/A CREB mice had a significantly longer tau than WT mice and reduced activity amplitude. In S/A CREB mice, light-evoked clock entrainment, using both Aschoff type 1 and 6 h “jet lag” paradigms, was markedly reduced relative to WT mice. S/A CREB mice exhibited attenuated transcriptional drive, as assessed by examining both clock-gated and light-evoked gene expression. Finally, SCN slice culture imaging detected a marked disruption in cellular clock phase synchrony following a phase-resetting stimulus in S/A CREB mice. Together, these data indicate that signaling through CREB phosphorylation at Ser¹³³ is critical for the functional fidelity of both SCN timing and entrainment.

Keywords

CREB suprachiasmatic nucleus entrainment tau cell synchrony

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the mammalian hypothalamus is the locus of the master circadian clock. Hormonal and synaptic information from the SCN orchestrates the rhythmic gating of various physiological, biochemical, and even behavioral processes. At the center of this clock timing process is a cell autonomous, autoregulatory, transcriptional/translational feedback loop (TTFL), in which an E-box-bound bHLH CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimeric transcription factor drives the expression of the period and cryptochrome gene families (as reviewed by Ko and Takahashi, 2006; Buhr and Takahashi, 2013; Partch et al., 2014). These genes negatively feedback on their own expression via the suppression of E-box-mediated transcription. Although this is a self-regulating transcriptional loop, ancillary transcriptional pathways contribute to the robustness and the phasing of the core clock oscillation. In line with this idea, transcriptional regulation via the CREB (cyclic AMP response element binding protein/CRE (cyclic AMP response element) pathway appears to play a key role in modulating core clock molecular timing, as well as the entraining effects of light, which reset the phasing of core clock molecular oscillators (Gau et al., 2002; Tischkau et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2010; reviewed by Hastings et al., 2014). CREB is a member of the ATF/CREM family of leucine zipper transcription factors that binds to the 8 base pair palindromic CRE sequence, TGACGTCA. CREB was initially characterized as a key regulator of the inducible expression of the somatostatin gene (Gonzalez and Montminy, 1989), and is now recognized as a principal route through which synaptic activity drives the expression of numerous plasticity-associated genes (Pham et al., 1999; Davis et al., 2000; Roy et al., 2013; Gandolfi et al., 2017; reviewed by Lonze and Ginty, 2002; Sakamoto et al., 2011).

A key event in the activation of CREB is its inducible phosphorylation of a serine residue at position 133 (Ser¹³³). This serine site is the target of numerous proline-directed serine/threonine kinases, including protein kinase A, mitogen-stress activated kinase, and Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type IV (CaMKIV) (Gonzalez and Montminy, 1989; Matthews et al., 1994; Sun et al., 1994; Enslen et al., 1995; Parker et al., 1996; Deak et al., 1998; Arthur and Cohen, 2000; Naqvi et al., 2014). At the mechanistic level, this phosphorylation event creates a docking site for CBP (CREB binding protein), which in turn, allows CBP to interact with and stabilize the basal transcriptional complex, thus allowing gene expression to be initiated (for review, see Mayr and Montminy, 2001). Consistent with this idea, numerous in vitro studies have shown that mutation of serine-133 to alanine (which cannot serve as a phospho-acceptor) can repress this inducible transcription (Gonzalez and Montminy, 1989; Sun et al., 1992; Klemm et al., 1998; Naqvi et al., 2014). Indeed, given the association between CREB phosphorylation at Ser¹³³ (pCREB) and the induction of CRE-mediated gene expression, pCREB profiling (using antibodies directed against the phosphorylated Ser¹³³ motif) is often used as a type of short-hand to infer gene transcription. However, various studies have indicated that CREB-mediated transcription can also be actuated via mechanisms that do not require Ser¹³³ phosphorylation (Lamarre-Vincent and Hsieh-Wilson, 2003; Lu et al., 2003; Briand et al., 2015; for review see Conkright et al., 2003).

Within the SCN, both CREB phosphorylation and CRE-mediated gene expression are under the control of the circadian clock (Obrietan et al., 1999). Moreover, signaling via the CREB/CRE pathway is implicated in coupling photic input to the induction of period gene expression, and the subsequent resetting of the core clock timing process (Tischkau et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2010). Further, the CREB/CRE pathway can regulate the amplitude of the core clock timing rhythm (as assessed via period2-luciferase activity) (O’Neill et al., 2008). Given these findings, and the noted correlation between the phosphorylation state of CREB at Ser¹³³ and the induction of CRE-mediated gene expression, it is significant that the precise role of Ser¹³³ phosphorylation in the functioning of the circadian clock has not been systematically examined. Here, we utilized a genetically modified mouse strain, in which Ser¹³³ in CREB was mutated to alanine, to assess the contribution of this phosphorylation event to key aspects of clock timing and entrainment. The data presented here indicate that the phosphorylation of this site contributes to a broad range of clock-gated processes.

Materials and Methods

Mice

CREB serine 133 to alanine 133 knock-in mice (hereafter referred to as S/A CREB mice) were generated in the lab of J. Simon C. Arthur (University of Dundee, UK). Details of the gene targeting strategy, animal husbandry and genotyping procedures have been previously described (Wingate et al., 2009; Naqvi et al., 2014). The S/A CREB line was bred into the C57BL/6 background for at least 8 generations before their use here. S/A CREB homozygous mice were generated from heterozygous breeding pairs, and the wild-type (WT) offspring were used as reference experimental groups. Consistent with the work of Wingate et al. (2009), we found that S/A CREB homozygous pups were generated at a lower Mendelian ratio than would be expected for a heterozygous breeding strategy. All animals in the WT and S/A CREB groups passed a visual acuity test, which confirmed these systems were intact in S/A CREB mice; visual tests were performed as previously reported (Hansen et al., 2013). To examine cellular level timing, the S/A CREB mouse line was crossed with the period1-Venus reporter gene mouse line, which is described in Cheng et al. (2007). All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Ohio State University.

Behavioral Assessment of Circadian Clock Timing and Entrainment

Wheel running activity was used as a measure of circadian timing and clock entrainment. To this end, mice were individually housed in clear polycarbonate cages equipped with running wheels (15 cm in diameter). Wheel rotations were binned into 5-min intervals and collected using the Actiview hardware and software system (Starr Life Sciences; Oakmont, PA). All mice were initially entrained to a 12-h light (300 lux)/12-h dark (LD) cycle for a minimum of 10 days. For experiments that profiled locomotor activity under LD conditions, mice were maintained in this condition for a minimum of 10 additional days. For experiments that assessed free running activity, mice were transferred to total darkness (DD) and allowed to run for up to 50 days.

To examine the rate of re-entrainment to a shift in the noted LD cycle, mice were challenged with a 6-h advance and 6-h delay in the onset of the LD cycle. For these assays, mice were maintained on a stable LD cycle for at least 14 days before the light cycle shift. To assess the phase delaying effects of an early night light pulse, mice were initially dark-adapted for a minimum of 14 days, and then exposed to white light (50 lux, 15 min) at circadian time (CT) 15; animals were then returned to the DD condition for another 21 days.

Assessment of Circadian and Light-entrainment Phenotypes

Tau was determined with the assistance of the Actiview software program. To this end, a linear regression method was used to draw a line through the onset of daily activity for a period of 5-9 days, approximately 14 days after the transition into DD. Average activity profiles were generated using ClockLab Analysis software for 14 contiguous days of LD and DD lighting conditions (ActiMetrics; Wilmette, IL). Other activity parameters were assessed over 14 days of LD or DD conditions with the assistance of ClockLab Analysis software, including phase angle of entrainment, total activity, night/day activity ratios, and average daily bouts of activity. These activity parameters are presented as the mean ±SEM for each experimental group. Analysis was performed using a Student’s t test and p values of <0.05 were deemed statistically significant.

The phase shifting effects of a light-pulse at CT 15 were assessed with the use of the linear regression method described in Daan and Pittendrigh (1976). Regression analysis was performed on 6 days of locomotor actogram data preceding the light pulse and on 6 days of data after the light pulse (starting 3 days after the light treatment). Phase delay values are presented as the mean ±SEM for each experimental group, and significance was assessed via Student’s t test: p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Brain Tissue Processing

Animals were killed via cervical dislocation and decapitated under dim red light (<5 lux at cage level) at the noted circadian time points. Brains were isolated and then placed in ice-cold oxygenation media, and cut into 500-µm-thick coronal slices with a Leica tissue slicer (VT1200; Leica; Nussloch, Germany). SCN-containing sections were transferred to a 4% paraformaldehyde solution diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 6 h at 4°C, and then cryoprotected overnight at 4°C in 30% sucrose in PBS (w/v, with 2 mM sodium azide and 3 mM sodium fluoride). Sections were then thin-cut (40 μm) with a freezing microtome and transferred into PBS containing 2 mM sodium azide and 3 mM sodium fluoride, pH 7.4.

Immunolabeling

For immunohistochemical labeling, SCN-containing sections were initially treated with 0.3% H₂O₂ in PBS for 20 min at room temperature, and then blocked and permeabilized in 10% goat serum/PBS containing Triton-X 100 (0.2%) for 1 h. Sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with the following antibodies (all raised in rabbit): pCREB (1:1000 dilution, catalog code: 9198, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA); CREB (1:1000; 9197, Cell Signaling Technology), pERK (1:3000; 9101, Cell Signaling Technology), JunB (1:250; 3753, Cell Signaling Technology) or Period1 (1:1000; provided by Dr. Steven Reppert; University of Massachusetts). Next, tissue was processed using the Vectastain Elite labeling kit, per the manufacturer’s instructions (Vector Laboratories; Burlingame, CA), and the signal was visualized using nickel-intensified diaminobenzidine substrate (Vector Laboratories). The sections were then washed twice for 5 min in deionized water and mounted onto slides with Permount media (Fisher Scientific). Between each labeling step, tissue sections were washed in PBS (3 times, 5 min/wash). Of note, for the pCREB labeling, we intentionally performed an extended period of DAB development, which provided a high baseline level of labeling in the WT tissue. This approach was used to help differentiate labeling in the S/A CREB mice from labeling in the WT mice.

For immunofluorescence labeling, tissues were permeabilized and blocked, as described above, and then incubated (overnight, 4°C) with 5% goat serum/PBS containing rabbit anti-c-Fos (1:1500; ABE457, Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Sections were then incubated (2 h, room temperature) with Alexa Fluor-conjugated antibodies directed against the IgG domain of the rabbit primary antibody (1:1000; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Sections were mounted with Fluoromount-G (0100-01; Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL).

Brightfield images were captured using a Micromax YHS 1300 camera (Princeton Instruments, Trenton, NJ) connected to a Leica DMIR microscope. Fluorescence images were acquired using a Leica SP8 confocal microscope. Both fluorescent and brightfield images were analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health; Bethesda, MD).

Image Quantitation

Immunopositive c-Fos, JunB and Period1 cells were counted throughout the SCN using ImageJ. Initially, an intensity threshold cutoff filter was applied to all images to remove background labeling, and positive cells above the defined threshold were quantified. The total number of positive cells were averaged from 2 central SCN sections per animal. Mean group data were generated, and statistical significance was assessed using a 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison tests using GraphPad Prism 6.0. Data are presented as the group mean ±SEM. p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. For pERK analysis in the control and light-pulsed animals, a region of interest was generated that circumscribed the ventro-medial/“core” region of the SCN, and a mean intensity value for the region of interest was generated for each SCN using ImageJ. Mean values were averaged for each genotype, and compared for statistical significance using the Student’s t test.

Cresyl Violet Staining

SCN-containing sections were mounted on gelatin-coated slides and dried. Tissues were rehydrated using a graded alcohol series and then placed in water. Tissues were then stained with 0.3% cresyl violet solution in water for 20 min, and then de-stained with 95% ethanol containing 0.1% glacial acetic acid. Sections were then dehydrated, cleared with xylenes, and mounted with Permount.

Slice Imaging

Twenty six-day old period1-Venus::WT and period1-Venus::S/A CREB mice were sacrificed at ZT6. Brains were place in ice-cold oxygenation media (120 mM NaCl, 3.5 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 1.2 mM Na₂H₂PO₄, 0.5 mM CaCl₂, 3 mM MgSO₄, 32.3 mM NHCO₃, 10 mM Dextrose) and 180-µ-thick coronal sections containing the SCN were obtained with a Leica VT1200 tissue slicer. SCN-containing sections were then immersed in dissection media (oxygenation media with 1% penicillin/streptomycin [5140122, Gibco], 0.06% nystatin [N1638, Sigma-Aldrich], and 0.1 µM MK801[0924, Tocris]), trimmed to isolate the SCN with ~1 mm of surrounding hypothalamic tissue, and then placed on a fluid interface filter (30-mm diameter Millicell, PICM0RG50, Millipore-Sigma, Darmstadt, Germany) in a 35-mm dish. SCN slice cultures were maintained in tissue culture media (0.5 mM Glutamax (35050061, Gibco), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 0.1 µM MK-801, 2% B-27 (17504044, Gibco) 0.06% nystatin, and 5% horse serum in Neurobasal (1088022, Gibco) at 35°C in a CO₂ incubator. The media was changed 2 h after culturing. Two days later, the 35-mm dish containing the SCN slice cultures were sealed with an ALA MEA-SHEET (to avoid evaporation of the media and allow for gas exchange; Multi Channel Systems, Reutlingen, Germany) and transferred to a stage-top incubator set to 5% CO₂ and 35°C (Oko Labs, Pozzuoli, Italy). Venus fluorescence data were collected using an inverted SP8 confocal microscope. Z-stack images (10-µ intervals) through the SCN were acquired at 1 h intervals over the duration of the experiment. For serum shock experiments, baseline Venus expression data were first collected for 5 days. Then, 40 µL of media containing 20% horse serum was applied to the top of each slice, and subsequently the media below the insert was replaced with 20% serum-containing media. After 30 min, the 20% serum media added to the top of each slice was removed and imaging resumed for an additional 5 days (the 20% serum in the media below the insert was maintained for the 5 day period).

Slice Analysis

Venus expression for whole SCN and single cells was initially analyzed using ImageJ to generate mean Venus expression values. For the whole SCN analysis, a region of interest was drawn around the SCN and a separate region lateral to the SCN within the hypothalamus was drawn for each slice. These regions were used to measure mean Venus expression for each time frame of the 10-day (pre- and post-serum treatment) imaging experiment. Mean lateral hypothalamus Venus expression was then subtracted from the SCN to generate a normalized Venus value for each hour of the experiment. This process was performed for slices from 5 animals for S/A CREB and WT genotypes. Single-cell Venus expression profiling was performed using the circadian gene expression (CGE) plug-in within ImageJ (Sage et al., 2010). The radius of the cell nucleus was defined as 10-pixels, which determined the region of interest drawn for the CGE plug-in.

Period and amplitude of the SCN and individual cells within the SCN were calculated using MetaCycle (Wu et al., 2016). MetaCycle parameters were as follows; P < 0.05, minper = 20, maxper = 28, cycMethod = c (“ARS,” “JTK,” “LS”), analysisStrategy = “auto,” outputFile = TRUE, outIntegration = “both,” adjustPhase = “predictedPer,” combinePvalue = “bonferroni” weightedPerPha = FALSE, ARSmle = “auto,” and ARSdefaultPer = 24. The period and amplitude of the total SCN Venus expression was determined for pre-serum and post-serum conditions for SCN slices from 5 animals per genotype, and the mean ±SEM period and amplitude were calculated. The Venus rhythms represented in Figure 7A were detrended using BioDare2 analysis software. Change in Venus rhythm amplitude in relation to serum treatment was performed by dividing the mean post-serum amplitude by the mean pre-serum amplitude for each slice (120 h of oscillatory activity was profiled for the pre- and post-serum periods). Amplitude changes for each genotype are presented as the group mean ±SEM percentage change. Pre-serum and post-serum cellular amplitudes were also determined, as described above. Mean cellular amplitude was compared between genotypes and treatments using a 2-way ANOVA.

The phase of individual cells within the total SCN was defined by peak Venus expression within a defined 24-h period before and after serum treatment for 50 cells. The phases of the cells were descriptively presented by generating raster plots in Microsoft Excel. To quantitatively assess the mean phase of cells within a given condition and genotype (i.e., pre/post serum, SA-CREB/WT), Rayleigh plots were generated using the open source MATLAB toolbox CircStat (Berens, 2009). The hour of peak period1-Venus expression was recorded for each cell examined, and hours were converted to circular degrees by multiplying the hour by 15 degrees (i.e., phase at 14 h post-recording = 210 degrees), as this degree measurement was obtained by dividing 360 degrees by the expected period length of 24 h (360 degrees/24 h period = 15 degrees/h). Using CircStat, the mean resultant vector (mean phase of all cells examined) was computed for each condition, and the length of the resultant vector was also determined to measure the relative heterogeneity of cell phases within a slice. Degrees of mean vector length were multiplied by 15 degrees/h to convert the mean resultant vector back into hours post-recording.

Results

The studies described here utilized a knock-in mouse model in which the serine residue located at position 133 within the transcription factor CREB was replaced with an alanine residue (Wingate et al., 2009). Alanine does not serve as a phospho-acceptor and thus, the functional contribution of phosphorylation at this residue to CREB-dependent transcription can be assessed. Initially, PCR-genotyping was used to confirm that the heterozygous breeding strategy (S/A CREB^+/−::S/A CREB^+/−) generated offspring that were homozygous for the S/A point mutation (S/A CREB^+/+; Fig. 1A). However, consistent with the data from Naqvi et al. (2014), the expected Mendelian frequency of S/A CREB^+/+ offspring (1:4) was markedly reduced, indicating lethality in a subset of the S/A CREB^+/+ embryos.

Figure 1.

SCN characterization in the S/A CREB mouse line. (A) PCR-based genotyping was used to identify S/A CREB knock-in mice. Mice homozygous for the S/A-CREB transgene (S/A CREB+/+) were generated from crossing S/A CREB heterozygous mice (S/A CREB^+/−). The diagnostic PCR results of WT CREB (S/A CREB^-/-), S/A CREB^+/− and S/A CREB^+/+ mice are shown. (B) Immunohistochemical labeling for the phosphorylated form of CREB (pCREB) at Ser¹³³ from WT and homozygous S/A CREB mice (hereafter referred to as “S/A-CREB”). Notably, the expected loss of pCREB immunolabeling was detected in S/A CREB tissue. Bar: 500 microns. Images of the SCN from coronal sections (top panels) are depicted in the bottom panels. Bar: 200 microns. (C) Immunohistochemical labeling for CREB in the SCN in WT and S/A-CREB mice. Of note, CREB expression levels in S/A CREB mice were consistent with the levels observed in WT mice. Bar: 200 microns. (D) Nissl stain from WT and S/A-CREB mice. Bar: 500 microns.

As expected, immunolabeling for the Ser¹³³ phosphorylated form of CREB revealed a complete loss of antigenicity in S/A CREB homozygous mice (from here onward, mice that are homozygous for the S/A knock-in are referred to as “S/A CREB” mice) (Fig. 1B). These data are consistent with previous work, which used Western analysis to show that pCREB antigenicity was eliminated in cortical cultures from S/A CREB mice (Wingate et al., 2009). In contrast, total CREB levels in the SCN appeared to be consistent between the S/A CREB mice and WT (C57BL/6) mice (Fig. 1C). Thus, deletion of Ser¹³³ phosphorylation did not affect the expression of the alanine-mutated form of CREB.

Through gross morphological assessment of the SCN and surrounding hypothalamic tissue via Nissl staining, we did not detect any marked differences between the S/A CREB mice and WT littermates (Fig. 1D). Likewise, visual acuity tests, tests of arousal, and locomotor activity tests did not detect any marked abnormalities in the S/A CREB mice (data not shown). Together, these findings indicate that the elimination of the Ser¹³³ residue did not result in marked developmental or neuroanatomical abnormalities within the SCN.

Wheel running activity was used to assess SCN clock timing and the entraining effects of light. Initially, mice were placed on a 12 h light/12 h dark (LD) cycle and activity during the light and dark phases was assessed. Actograph analysis revealed striking differences in both the amount and distribution of locomotor activity between the WT and S/A CREB mouse lines. As expected, WT mice exhibited consolidated and long-lasting bouts of activity during the early part of the dark phase (Fig. 2A and 2B). In contrast, S/A CREB mice exhibited fragmented bouts of activity that were distributed throughout the dark phase (Fig. 2A and 2B). The phase angle of entrainment of locomotor activity following lights-off at ZT12 was significantly delayed in S/A CREB mice (Fig. 2C1). Consistent with this delayed phase angle of entrainment, often, the first extended bout of activity was not observed until several hours into the dark phase (Fig. 2A). As a corollary, acrophase analysis revealed that peak locomotor activity in S/A CREB mice was significantly delayed, by approximately 2 h, relative to WT mice (mean acrophase: WT: CT16.28 [±0.11] h, and S/A CREB: CT18.26 [±0.19] h; p < 0.001, Student’s t test, n = 12 to 13 animals per genotype). Notably, in many of the S/A CREB mice, the dark-phase bout of locomotor activity continued (albeit at reduced levels) well into the light phase (Fig. 2B: bottom panel). Consistent with this reduced ability to consolidate running to the night-time domain, the night/day ratio of locomotor activity was significantly lower in the S/A CREB mice compared with the WT mice (Fig. 2C2). Interestingly, S/A CREB mice also exhibited a significantly lower level of locomotor activity in LD than WT mice (Fig. 2B; mean wheel rotations/5 min binned period: WT mice: 53.29 [±6.36] and S/A CREB mice: 21.93 [±3.68]; p < 0.0001, Student’s t test, n = 12 to 13 animals per genotype). Together, these data reveal that the S/A CREB mice have a reduced capacity to entrain to an LD cycle, reduced activity, and a fragmentation of activity during the night.

Figure 2.

Light- and clock-gated locomotor activity of S/A CREB mice. (A) Representative double plotted actographs of wheel running activity from one WT and 3 S/A CREB mice. Darkened regions of the plots denote periods when the lights were off. Mice were initially entrained to a 12:12 h light/dark (LD) condition, then the light cycle was phase-advanced, and phase delayed by 6 h, and finally, mice were transfer to constant darkness (DD). The S/A CREB mice exhibited variable activity onset under the LD condition, and a long tau phenotype under DD. The red highlight in the far-right trace denotes a period of disrupted/intermittent data collection. (B) Mean daily activity profiles of WT and S/A CREB mice in LD; the boxed region (red) in the top panel is magnified in the lower panel. With the expanded scale, a marked relative increase in daytime activity in S/A CREB mice can be visualized. (C) Quantification of the mean (±SEM) phase angle of entrainment (C1), the night/day activity ratio (C2), and the days to re-entrain to the 6 h phase advance (C3) for WT and S/A CREB mice. (D) Mean circadian period (D1), and the average daily bouts of activity (D2) in DD are presented for WT and S/A CREB mice. (E) Average daily activity profiles of WT and S/A CREB animals in constant darkness. Data in B to E were averaged from 12 to 13 animals per genotype. **p < 0.001; *p < 0.01, Student’s t-tests.

To assess the impact of the S/A CREB mutation on period (tau) of the SCN oscillator, mice were transferred from the LD cycle to total darkness (DD) and allowed to free-run for over 20 days (Fig. 2A). WT mice exhibited an average tau of 23.78 h, which is consistent with published data on C57BL/6 mice (Schwartz and Zimmerman, 1990) (Fig. 2A and 2D1). In contrast, S/A CREB mice exhibited a long tau phenotype of 24.34 h, which was significantly different from WT mice (Fig. 2D1). Furthermore, S/A CREB mice had significantly more fragmented activity during DD (Fig. 2D2), and their overall activity in DD was reduced relative to WT mice (Fig. 2E; mean wheel rotations/5 min binned period: WT: 40.68 [±6.78] and S/A CREB: 17.36 [±5.24]; p = 0.01, Student’s t test, n = 12 to 13 animals per genotype). Together, these data indicate that the phosphorylation of CREB at Serine 133 is critical for setting the period and regulating the fidelity of the circadian oscillator.

To further test the idea that S/A CREB mice exhibited disrupted light entrainment, we assessed the re-entrainment rate to a 6 h advance and a 6 h delay in the light cycle. Here, we show that WT mice exhibited a ~3.4-day entrainment to the 6 h advance in the light cycle (Fig. 2A and 2C3). In contrast, a large percentage of S/A CREB mice showed difficulty resetting to a new light cycle (Fig. 2A). Along these lines, even after 10 days in the new light cycle, ~ 40% of S/A CREB mice (n = 5/13) exhibited only limited bouts of activity that corresponded to the dark transition time point; these mice remained largely entrained to the previous light cycle. Of the S/A CREB mice that efficiently reset their activity rhythm to the new light cycle (8/13 mice), the rate of re-entrainment, approximately 6.5 days, was significantly slower than that of the WT mice (Fig. 2C3). In contrast to the deficits observed in the 6 h advancing profile, S/A CREB mice exhibited a similar rate of entrainment to a 6 h delay as WT mice (rate of re-entrainment: WT 1.77 days [±0.28 h], S/A CREB 2.39 days [±0.31 h], p = 0.15, Student’s t test, n = 12 to 13 animals per genotype).

To further address the light entrainment properties of the S/A CREB mice, we used an Aschoff type I paradigm (Aschoff, 1965), which allowed us to test the resetting response to an acute phase delaying (early night) light pulse. To this end, mice were dark-adapted for 21 days, and then exposed to a light pulse (50 lux, 15 min) at circadian time 15 (CT15). With this paradigm, WT mice exhibited a phase delay of 97.39 (±8.34) min; in contrast, S/A CREB mice exhibited a significant relative reduction in the phase-delaying effects of light, as their average shift was only 27.69 (±6.10) min (Fig 3A and 3B). Late-night, phase-advancing light pulses were not utilized, given the relatively weak phase-resetting effects of late-night light observed in C57BL/6 mice, coupled with the weak and fragmented DD free-running rhythm of S/A CREB mice. Mock light treatment at CT15 did not markedly alter the clock phasing of either WT or SA-CREB mice (data not shown). Together, these data reveal a critical role for CREB phosphorylation at Ser¹³³ in the coupling of light to entrainment of the circadian clock.

Figure 3.

Light-evoked phase delaying is attenuated in S/A CREB mice. (A) Mice were dark adapted and exposed to light (100 lux, 15 min) at CT 15 and allowed to free run for an additional 14 days. The arrow to the left of each trace denotes the day of the light pulse, and the regression lines denote activity onset before and after the light pulse. (B) Mean (± SEM) phase delay, in minutes, is depicted for the WT and S/A CREB mice. S/A CREB mice had significantly attenuated entrainment relative to WT mice. n = 12-13 animals per group. *p< 0.001, Student's t test.

Next, we assessed the effects of the S/A mutation on inducible gene expression in the SCN. To this end, we profiled the expression of c-Fos, JunB and the core clock protein Period1 (Figs. 4 and 5). Mice were initially dark-adapted for 2 days, exposed to light (50 lux) for 15 min at CT15 and then sacrificed either 45 min later (to profile c-Fos and JunB) or 4 h later (to profile Period1). These time courses are in accordance with the reported light-evoked expression profiles for these 3 proteins (Aronin et al., 1990; Rusak et al., 1990, 1992; Kornhauser et al., 1992; Yan and Silver, 2004). In WT mice, light triggered the expected increase in all 3 immediate early genes. Interestingly, the evoked expression of all 3 genes was significantly blunted in S/A CREB mice (as measured by the number of immunopositive cells for each protein). Notably, fold-induction of light-evoked c-Fos expression was reduced by ~63% in S/A CREB mice, relative to fold induction observed in WT mice (Fig. 4A). Similarly, a ~43% relative decrease in JunB induction was observed in S/A CREB mice (Fig. 4B). Likewise, the fold photic induction of the core clock gene Period1 was reduced by ~43% in S/A CREB mice, relative to the fold induction in WT mice (Fig. 5A). Finally, basal expression of cFos, JunB, and Period1 (at CT15) were not significantly different between S/A CREB and WT animals.

Figure 4.

Light-evoked immediate early gene expression is attenuated in S/A CREB mice. For the analysis of cFos (A) and JunB (B), WT and S/A CREB mice were pulsed with light (50 lux, 15 min) at CT15 and sacrificed 45 min later. Representative images of the SCN reveal marked light evoked cFos and JunB expression in WT mice and a reduced relative level of induction in S/A CREB animals, as determined by the total number of immunopositive SCN cells. Quantification of the mean (±SEM) number of cFos- and JunB-immunopositive cells is provided in the lower panels. Bar: 100 microns. Data were analyzed via a one-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni multiple comparison test; post-hoc testing compared the WT and S/A CREB light-pulse conditions. *p < 0.001. n.s. = not significant. n = 4 to 5 per genotype per condition.

Figure 5.

Light-evoked Period1 expression is attenuated in S/A CREB mice. (A) Top panels: WT and S/A CREB mice were pulsed with light (50 lux, 15 min) at CT15 and sacrificed 4 hours later. Within the ventral SCN (denoted by the dashed ovals: top panels), light evoked an increase in Period1 immunopositive cells, an induction that was attenuated in the S/A CREB SCN compared to WT SCN. Bottom panels) Quantification of the mean (+ SEM) Period1 expression within the ventral SCN is quantified. Data were analyzed via a one-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni multiple comparison test; post-hoc testing compared the WT and S/A CREB light-pulse conditions. *: p < 0.001. n.s. = not significant. n = 4-5/genotype/condition. (B) Top panels: Animals were subjected to a 50 lux light pulse for 15 min at CT15 and immediately killed. Representative images of pERK expression in WT and S/A CREB SCN tissue from light-treated and control animals (no light) are shown; note the marked light-evoked increase in ERK activation in both mouse lines. Bottom panel: Quantification of mean (+ SEM) pERK expression within the SCN. No significant difference was detected in the level of light-evoked ERK activation between the S/A CREB and WT mouse lines. Bar: 200 microns.

As a control experiment, we also tested whether the S/A CREB mutation could be affecting upstream synaptic circuits or the light responsiveness of SCN neurons. To this end, we profiled the photic response properties of the p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Of note, the MAPK pathway is highly sensitive to light stimulation during the night-time domain and is a key regulator of Ser¹³³ CREB phosphorylation (Obrietan et al., 1998, 1999). For this experiment, mice were dark-adapted for 2 days and then exposed to light (50 lux, 15 min) at CT15, and the tissue was labeled for phosphorylated forms of ERK1 (tyrosine-202 and threonine-204) and ERK2 (threonine-185 and tyrosine-187). These dual phosphorylation events are essential steps in the activation of the MAPK cascade. In both WT and S/A CREB mice, robust ERK activation was detected, relative to mice that were not exposed to light; further, the level of induction was not significantly different between WT and S/A CREB mice (Fig. 5B). This indicates that the photic response pathway from melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells to the intracellular SCN signaling events upstream of CREB are not markedly altered in S/A CREB mice. Together, the results in this section indicate that CREB phosphorylation at Ser¹³³ plays a key role in light-evoked gene expression in the SCN.

Next, we examined circadian clock-gated expression of the 3 noted genes (c-Fos, JunB and Period1) in the S/A CREB mouse line. The expression of both c-Fos and JunB within the SCN have been reported to be regulated by the circadian clock, with peak levels of each immediate early gene (IEG) expression occurring during the early subjective day (Guido et al., 1996, 1999; Miller et al., 2005). For this experiment, mice were dark-adapted for 2 days, and then tissue was collected at 6-h intervals across the circadian cycle, starting at CT4. In WT mice the expression of both c-Fos and JunB followed the expected pattern, with peak expression within the shell occurring during the early subjective day (Fig. 6A and 6B). Interestingly, in S/A CREB mice, the early day peak in c-Fos and JunB was significantly blunted relative to WT mice (Fig. 6A and 6B).

Figure 6.

Circadian clock-gated gene expression is altered in S/A CREB mice. Mice were dark-adapted for 2-days and then sacrificed at CT4, CT10, CT16 and CT22. (A) Left panel: Representative immunofluorescence images of c-Fos expression from the SCN of WT and S/A CREB animals. Right panel: cFos-positive SCN cells were quantified and plotted across the circadian cycle; note that, at CT4, the number of cFos-positive cells were significantly reduced in S/A CREB SCN compared with WT animals; *p = 0.015. (B) Representative immunohistochemical labeling (left panel) and quantitative analysis (right panel) for JunB expression in the SCN. At CT4, JunB expression was significantly reduced in S/A CREB mice; *p < 0.001. (C) Representative immunohistochemical labeling (left panel), and quantitative analysis (right panel) for Period1 expression in the SCN; *p < 0.001. Asterisks denote time points where the expression was significantly different between S/A CREB and WT (p-values were attained using a 2-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni multiple comparison test; n = 4 to 5 mice per genotype per timepoint).

Rhythms of the core clock protein Period1 within the SCN have been well-documented, with peak levels occurring during the early subjective night (Hastings et al., 1999). Interestingly, in S/A CREB mice, damped Period1 expression was observed during the subjective day (i.e., CT10; Fig. 6C). This reduction was observed throughout the rostro-caudal extent of the SCN. However, by the early subjective night, levels of Period1 in the S/A CREB mice had sharply risen, reaching a level that was not significantly different from the level observed in WT mice (i.e., CT16; Fig. 6C). Together, these data indicate that the S/A CREB mutation leads to damped transcriptional drive during the subjective daytime.

The effects reported here, combined with recent work showing that CREB serves as a nodal point between rhythms in cytoplasmic signaling (e.g, Ca²⁺, cAMP) and the core clock TTFL, led us to examine the effects of the S/A mutation on both the molecular clock cycling and entrainment properties of the SCN. For this study, we crossed the S/A CREB line with our period1-Venus transgenic reporter mouse line, and oscillations in Venus expression were monitored using slice culture imaging. Of note, the Venus transgene was inserted into the coding region of the period1 gene via BAC recombination and its nuclear-targeting and rapid turn-over provide a robust readout of the core-clock timing process (Cheng et al., 2007, 2009; Cao et al., 2011). For these experiments, mice (WT::Venus and S/A CREB::Venus) were sacrificed at ZT 6, and SCN slice oscillatory capacity (amplitude, phase, and period) was profiled at 1-h intervals over a 240-h period via confocal microscopy. Baseline profiling of SCN-wide oscillations over the first 120 h (Fig. 7A: Pre-Serum) revealed that S/A CREB::Venus SCN slices had a significantly longer period than WT::Venus SCN slices (Fig. 7B: 23.98 h vs. 23.32 h, respectively); however, the mean rhythm amplitude was not significantly different between the WT::Venus and S/A CREB::Venus slices (Fig. 7A; statistical analysis not shown).

Figure 7.

SCN neuronal cell synchrony is reduced in S/A CREB mice. period1-Venus mice were crossed to the S/A CREB line and organotypic slices containing the SCN were cultured and images were acquired for 4 days before and 4 days after treatment with 20% serum. (A) Top panel: Representative Venus expression profiling over the noted time periods. Green arrow denotes serum treatment. Bottom panel: Confocal images (acquired at 4-h intervals) of Venus expression within the SCN of S/A CREB::Venus (top row) and WT::Venus (bottom row) tissue. The green outlined rectangular region denotes pre-serum time period; black outlined rectangular region denotes post-serum treatment period. The images are pseudocolored, with the highest levels of expression denoted with red hues. (B) The period of Venus expression within the SCN of S/A CREB::Venus and WT::Venus slices was quantified before and after serum treatment utilizing MetaCycle. *p < 0.05, Student's t test; n = 5/genotype. (C) Relative change in rhythm amplitude following serum treatment. Data are presented as the mean (±SEM) percentage change. *p < 0.01, Student's t test; n = 5 per genotype. (D) Rastor plots profiling Venus expression from 25 cells within the SCN from S/A CREB::Venus and WT::Venus slices, both before and after serum treatment. The green bar denotes the time point at which serum was added to the slice media. Below each rastor plot is a Rayleigh plot denoting the phase distribution of 50 cells at both pre- and post-serum treatment time points. Note the dispersed phase distribution following serum treatment in the S/A CREB::Venus SCN. Blue stars in the Rayleigh plots denote the 24-h period profiled in the Rayleigh plots. (E) Venus rhythm amplitude of the cells presented in the Rayleigh plot was determined using MetaCycle, as described in the Methods section. Individual cell amplitude was not significantly different between S/A CREB::Venus and WT::Venus cells. n.s. = not significant, Student's t test.

Following this 120-h baseline recording period, SCN tissue was challenged with a serum shock (20%) approximately 7 h after peak Venus expression, which, in vivo, corresponds to the subjective night phase of the circadian cycle (Cheng et al., 2009); the effects of clock entrainment and cellular synchrony/resynchronization were assayed. The rationale behind using serum to assess phase-shifting was based on data showing that serum drives MAPK signaling, and on data indicating that signaling via the MAPK pathway is a key event that triggers CREB-mediated clock resetting (Akashi and Nishida, 2000; Butcher et al. 2005). Given this, it was surprising to find that the phase-resetting effects of serum treatment were not affected by the S/A mutation; hence WT mice exhibited a 68 (±30.6) min phase advance, whereas S/A CREB mice exhibited a 50.2 (±22.4) min advance. Likewise, similar relative levels of serum-induced rhythm lengthening were observed in both phenotypes (Fig. 7B). Interestingly, however, in S/A CREB tissue, serum treatment led to significant Venus rhythm amplitude damping, relative to the amplitude before serum treatment (Fig. 7A and 7C). In contrast, significant serum-evoked damping was not observed in WT/Venus tissue (Fig. 7A and 7C).

To test whether this damping was the result of a reduction in neuronal cellular oscillator synchrony, we profiled single-cell Venus rhythms in the SCN of WT::Venus and S/A CREB::Venus slices. Raster plot and accompanying Rayleigh plot analyses of the SCN cells demonstrated that before serum treatment, cellular oscillators of both genotypes maintained a high degree of synchrony (Fig. 7D). However, after serum treatment, the phasing of Venus expression in the S/A CREB SCN cells became much more dispersed and desynchronized compared with the Venus expression among the WT SCN cells (Fig. 7D). To determine whether a change in the amplitude of the individual cells also contributed to the dampening of the SCN rhythm amplitude, we measured the single-cell Venus rhythm amplitude. Interestingly, the mean cellular amplitude was not different between the 2 genotypes either before or after serum treatment (Fig. 7E). Together, these data indicate that CREB phosphorylation at Ser¹³³ plays a critical role in the resynchronization/reestablishment of the cellular oscillator network following a resetting stimulus.

Discussion

Overview of the Study: Rationale and Findings

Here, we explored the contribution of CREB phosphorylation at Ser¹³³ to the functionality of the SCN timing system. As noted, CREB phosphorylation is often used to infer induction of CREB-dependent gene transcription. However, to date, the relevance of the Ser¹³³ phospho-acceptor site had not been tested within the context of the circadian timing system. This, combined with work showing that CREB-dependent transcription can be regulated by an array of additional post-translational modifications and cofactors (e.g., CRTCs) (Altarejos and Montminy, 2011; Ch’ng et al., 2012; Nonaka et al., 2014; Parra-Damas et al., 2017; reviewed by Sakamoto et al., 2011), provided us with a compelling rationale to pursue the studies described here.

Initially, our analysis of the gross anatomy of the SCN did not detect any marked changes/deficits in the S/A CREB knock-in mouse line. Further, the expression of CREB in the SCN was similar in S/A CREB and WT mice. This finding is consistent with work from Naqvi et al., (2014), which showed that CREB levels in embryonic fibroblasts derived from S/A CREB knock-in mice were not different from CREB levels in WT embryonic fibroblasts. Interestingly, Naqvi et al., (2014) also reported that the expression of ATF1 and CREM were not altered in the S/A CREB knock-in line. These findings are notable given that the targeted transgenic deletion of CREB can lead to the upregulation of other members of the ATF1 family of bZIP transcription factors (Hummler et al., 1994). Hence, these data indicate that the residual functional activity imparted by the S/A mutant form of CREB is largely sufficient for normal SCN development.

CREB and Light Entrainment

Numerous studies have examined the relationship between photic input and the phosphorylation of CREB at Ser¹³³ in the SCN (Ginty et al., 1993; Obrietan et al., 1999; Gau et al., 2002). Hence, photic stimulation during the subjective night but not during the subjective day stimulates marked CREB phosphorylation, and reporter gene approaches reveal that light actuation of CRE-mediated gene expression in the SCN is limited to the night time-domain (Obrietan et al., 1999). Here, we provide evidence that this phosphorylation event contributes to clock entrainment. Along these lines, the genetic elimination of the Ser¹³³ phospho-acceptor site leads to marked deficits in photic entrainment, including a delay in the phase angle of entrainment, a reduced rate of entrainment to a new light cycle and blunted light-pulse-mediated resetting. Further, our data are consistent with work showing that CREB plays a key role in entrainment of the circadian clock. Along these lines, work by Tischkau et al. (2003), which employed a decoy strategy to deplete CREB from native CRE promoters, found that a reduction in CREB-mediated transcription led to a marked attenuation in the phase shifting effect of light. Likewise, our earlier work using an A-CREB mouse strain, which potently represses CREB binding to the CRE site, led to an attenuation of light evoked clock entrainment (Lee et al., 2010). In the work reported here, it was interesting to find that many mice did not exhibit stable resetting to a 6 h advance in the light cycle, even after 7 days on the new cycle. Notably, a subset of the mice that were able to reset did so by phase-delaying to reach the new light-off time point. This phenotype could be a result of the delayed phase angle of entrainment.

The marked alteration in the distribution of locomotor activity across the circadian cycle was a particularly prominent aspect of the S/A CREB phenotype. C57BL/6 mice typically exhibit a robust bout of activity during the first half of the dark period and this activity tails-off in the second half of the night. In contrast, S/A CREB mice exhibited a nearly equal distribution of locomotor activity during the 2 halves of the night. Although some of this redistribution of activity could be accounted for by the negative phase angle of entrainment, if data averaging takes this into account, there is, nevertheless, still more robust activity during the second half of the night in the S/A CREB mice than in the WT animals. Possible explanations for this could include differential S/A CREB-mediated dysregulation of evening (E) and morning (M) oscillator populations, where the functioning of the E population is more affected in the S/A CREB mice. Interestingly, recent work has shown that the rhythms of these 2 distinct populations are important for determining the photoperiod of onset and offset of activity (Inagaki et al., 2007). Alternatively, disruption of CREB signaling may differentially affect transcriptional control mechanisms that are selectively recruited during the first half of the night and the second half of the night, which in turn, could lead to a reduction in early night activity; clearly additional experiments are merited.

In addition to the redistribution of night-time activity, variable low amplitude locomotor rhythms were another characteristic feature of the S/A CREB line. There are several potential explanations for this, including a reduction in the strength of the SCN oscillator, and a reduction in clock-gated output from the SCN. As noted, CREB-mediated signaling affects the expression of several genes (e.g., AVP, VIP, somatostatin) that could shape the functional properties of the SCN (e.g., SCN cellular communication and SCN clock output) (Montminy and Bilezikjian, 1987; Deutsch et al., 1988; Pardy et al., 1992). Further, CREB-mediated signaling is implicated in clock cell communication and, in turn, regulation of TTFL amplitude and the synchrony of cellular oscillators (Lee et al., 2010; Brancaccio et al., 2013). As such, the S/A CREB mutation may reduce the amplitude and the consolidation of locomotor output by damping TTFL oscillations and/or dysregulating the effective coupling of SCN cellular oscillator populations; a phenotypic effect that was detected using slice imaging methods (see below for an additional discussion of this point).

The noted photic entrainment phenotype in the S/A CREB mice was complemented by data showing marked suppression of light-evoked gene expression. The reduction in light-evoked c-Fos and JunB is in line with the well-characterized role of CREB in the inducible regulation of these 2 IEGs (Sheng et al., 1990; Chan et al., 1999). Consistent with this, the 5’-regulatory regions of both c-Fos and JunB have well-characterized CREB binding motifs, and reporter gene assays have shown that the suppression of CREB signaling reduces the inducible expression of both genes (Härtig et al., 1991; Nakajima et al., 1993; Ginty et al., 1994; Phinney et al., 1994). Interestingly, the role of Ser¹³³ phosphorylation at the level of IEG expression was recently characterized using embryonic fibroblasts from the S/A CREB mouse line. Naqvi et al. (2014) found that the inducible expression of numerous IEGs, including NOR1 and Nur77, are blunted by the S/A CREB mutation. Conversely, the expression of other IEGs, including Nur1 and ICER, were not affected by the S/A CREB mutation. Clearly these data speak to the tightly regulated, context-specific role that Ser¹³³ phosphorylation plays in regulating gene expression. Here, it is worth noting that, in addition to reducing transcriptional drive, the disruption of CREB signaling may have subtle effects on the kinetics of IEG expression (see Naviq et al., 2014); hence, a multi-time point analysis would be needed to determine whether an alteration in the temporal profile of gene induction may have contributed to the light-evoked IEG S/A CREB phenotype reported here.

With respect to the S/A CREB light entrainment phenotype, one of the most straightforward mechanistic explanations is centered on a blunted induction of the core clock gene period1. A connection between CREB and period1 expression is supported by a number of studies showing that CREB binds to the period1 5’-regulatory region, and that the disruption of CREB-dependent transcription represses period1 reporter gene expression (Travnickova-Bendova et al., 2002; Tischkau et al., 2003; Butcher et al., 2005). As a state variable of the core clock timing process, light-evoked period1 expression is thought to trigger the resetting of the TTFL (reviewed in Hastings et al., 2014); hence, in S/A CREB mice, the reduced inducible drive in period1 expression would likely lead to a reduced phase-shifting effect. Finally, it is important to note that the addition of serum evoked equivalent phase shifts in S/A CREB and WT SCN slices. Serum activates multiple and diverse signaling pathways and, as such, may not precisely model photic-evoked signaling. These serum-stimulated pathways could also function independently of CREB to drive clock resetting. Hence, serum exposure may have been a less-than-ideal model for light-evoked, CREB-dependent resetting.

Circadian Timing and Clock-driven Gene Expression

Clock-gated IEG expression is a well-characterized phenomenon. Along these lines, c-Fos and JunB exhibit a marked increase in expression within the dorsal SCN during the early subjective daytime (Schwartz et al., 2000). Here we found that this early subjective day peak in IEG expression was blunted in the S/A CREB mouse line. Interestingly, the rhythmic expression of c-Fos is reliant on an early-day increase in cAMP within the dorsal regions of the SCN in a manner dependent on RGS16 (regulator of G-protein signaling 16) (Doi et al., 2011). Clearly, an early-day increase in cAMP levels nicely fits with the data reported here, given that Ser¹³³ is a target of cAMP/PKA signaling. Interestingly, in a further parallel with the noted study, the long tau phenotype reported for the RGS16 knock-out mouse line is similar to the long tau phenotype of the S/A CREB mice. Collectively, these data suggest that temporally and anatomically precise regulation of signaling via a cAMP/CREB cassette is critical for 2 potentially related processes: the early day rise in inducible gene expression and the periodicity of the circadian oscillator. Here, one caveat should be noted: the long tau phenotype of the S/A CREB line likely led to a subtle lengthening of the circadian profile of IEG expression. As such, a higher-resolution, temporal analysis than the one performed here would be needed to address whether the difference in the tau length between S/A CREB mice and WT animals could have contributed to the reported differences in the daily rhythms in IEG expression.

CREB, Cellular Oscillator Synchrony and Circadian Timing

Clock-gated regulation of CREB/CRE transcription, initially reported in Drosophila (Belvin et al., 1999) and then in mammals (Obrietan et al., 1999), was followed-up with a series of studies that detailed the effects that CREB-mediated transcription has on the oscillatory properties of the TTFL (O’Neill et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2010). These studies showed that the disruption of CREB signaling or a reduction in cAMP signaling, led to a damping of period1 gene expression within the SCN (O’Neill et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2010; Brancaccio et al., 2013). In line with this, we found that the rhythmic expression of Period1 protein is blunted during the early day in S/A CREB mice. Interestingly, several studies using reporter gene methods have shown that CRE-mediated transcription within the SCN peaks during the subjective daytime (Obrietan et al., 1999; Brancaccio et al., 2013), and precedes the peak in period1-driven and period2-driven reporter gene expression by approximately 1 and 3 h, respectively (Brancaccio et al., 2013). Of note, peak levels of pCREB were detected during the second-half of the circadian night and early circadian day (Obrietan et al., 1999; Gau et al., 2002). The noted temporal profile of both CRE-mediated gene expression and period1 expression are largely consistent with the profiling data for Period1 reported here. Thus, the disruption in CREB signaling affected only the rate of the rising daytime phase of Period1 expression. Our histological profiling data also suggest that, later in the circadian cycle, E-box-dependent transcription would exert a larger effect, and thus could lead to equivalent levels of night-time Period1 in S/A CREB and WT mice. The underlying mechanisms that give rise to the long tau phenotype of the S/A CREB mice are not known. However, it is tempting to speculate that the noted decrease in the early day rise in gene expression likely contributes to the long tau phenotype, possibly via a relative delay in the accumulation of Period protein. Clearly, additional mechanistic studies will be required to further this line of work.

Interestingly, our slice culture data indicated a clear role for Ser¹³³ phosphorylation in cellular level clock synchrony. This effect was revealed by using a serum challenge and monitoring the phasing of individual cellular oscillators. The S/A CREB phenotype, which showed a significant desynchronization of cellular oscillators following stimulation, is similar to the phenotypic effects resulting from a loss of VIP (vasoactive intestinal peptide) signaling (Maywood et al., 2006; Brown et al., 2007; Hughes et al., 2008). As a putative downstream effector of VIP signaling, CREB/CRE-mediated transcription would be well positioned to function as a regulator of clock cell communication. Damped drive at the level of CRE-mediated transcription would affect the expression of a wide range of genes that could underlie the maintenance of clock cell synchrony. Additional experiments that probe the functional effects of CRE-mediated gene expression would likely provide important clues regarding the transcriptional events that underlie the stability of SCN pacemaker circuits.

Finally, it is important to note that the phosphorylation of Ser¹³³ is only one of several mechanisms by which CREB could drive transcriptional activity within the SCN. Indeed, both the phosphorylation of Ser¹⁴⁴ and the activation of CRTCs (cAMP-regulated transcriptional co-activators) have also been implicated in clock physiology. Interestingly, Ser¹⁴⁴ to alanine knock-in mice were reported to have a light entrainment deficit; however, in contrast with the work reported here, no effect on inherent clock timing or the overall levels of locomotor activity were found in Ser¹⁴⁴ knock-in mice (Gau et al., 2002). CRTCs are potent modulators of CREB-dependent transcription that function via a mechanism that is independent of Ser¹³³ phosphorylation. CRTC nuclear translocation (a marker of activation) is gated by circadian time and by photic input (Sakamoto et al., 2013), and CRTCs have been implicated in circadian clock entrainment (Jagannath et al., 2013). Clearly, a more comprehensive series of experiments are needed to effectively parse the ways in which CREB signaling shapes the functional fidelity of SCN timing and clock entrainment. As a step towards this deeper level of understanding, the data presented here supports a critical role for CREB phosphorylation at Ser¹³³ in both clock timing and entrainment.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Grant Sponsors: National Institutes of Health (Grant codes: MH103361, NS066345, NS091302) and the National Science Foundation (Grant code: 1354612).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article

ORCID iDs

K. A. Sullivan

H. Yoon

K. Obrietan

References

Akashi

Nishida

(2000) Involvement of the MAP kinase cascade in resetting of the mammalian circadian clock. Genes Dev 14:645-649.

Altarejos

Montminy

(2011) CREB and the CRTC co-activators: sensors for hormonal and metabolic signals. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12:141-151.

Aronin

Sagar

Sharp

Schwartz

(1990) Light regulates expression of a Fos-related protein in rat suprachiasmatic nuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:5959-5962.

Arthur

Cohen

(2000) MSK1 is required for CREB phosphorylation in response to mitogens in mouse embryonic stem cells. FEBS Lett 482:44-48.

Aschoff

(1965) Response curves in circadian periodicity. In: Circadian Clocks, Aschoff

, ed, pp 95-111. North-Holland Publishing: Amsterdam.

Belvin

Zhou

Yin

JCP

(1999) The Drosophila dCREB2 gene affects the circadian clock. Neuron 22:777-787.

Berens

(2009) CircStat: A MATLAB Toolbox for Circular Statistics. J Stat Software 31:1-21.

Brancaccio

Maywood

Chesham

Loudon

ASI

Hastings

(2013) A Gq-Ca2+ axis controls circuit-level encoding of circadian time in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Neuron 78:714-728.

Briand

Lee

Lelay

Kaestner

Blendy

(2015) Serine 133 phosphorylation is not required for hippocampal CREB-mediated transcription and behavior. Learn Mem 22:109-115.

10.

Brown

Colwell

Waschek

Piggins

(2007) Disrupted neuronal activity rhythms in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-deficient mice. J Neurophysiol 97:2553-2558.

11.

Buhr

Takahashi

(2013) Molecular components of the mammalian circadian clock. Handb Exp Pharmacol 3-27.

12.

Butcher

Lee

Cheng

H-YM

Obrietan

(2005) Light stimulates MSK1 activation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus via a PACAP-ERK/MAP kinase-dependent mechanism. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 25:5305-5313.

13.

Cao

Anderson

Jung

Y-J

Dziema

Obrietan

(2011) Circadian regulation of mTOR signaling in the mouse SCN. Neuroscience 181:79-88.

14.

Chan

JYH

Chen

W-C

Lee

H-Y

Chang

T-J

Chan

SHH

(1999) Phosphorylation of transcription factor CREB mediates c-fos induction elicited by sustained hypertension in rat nucleus tractus solitarii. Neuroscience 88:1199-1212.

15.

Cheng

H-YM

Papp

Varlamova

Dziema

Russell

Curfman

Nakazawa

Shimizu

Okamura

Impey

Obrietan

(2007) microRNA modulation of circadian-clock period and entrainment. Neuron 54:813-829.

16.

Ch’ng

Uzgil

Lin

Avliyakulov

O’Dell

Martin

(2012) Activity-dependent transport of the transcriptional coactivator CRTC1 from synapse to nucleus. Cell 150:207-221.

17.

Conkright

Canettieri

Screaton

Guzman

Miraglia

Hogenesch

Montminy

(2003) TORCs: transducers of regulated CREB activity. Mol Cell 12:413-423.

18.

Daan

Pittendrigh

(1976) A functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents. J Comp Physiol 106:253-266.

19.

Davis

Vanhoutte

Pages

Caboche

Laroche

(2000) The MAPK/ERK cascade targets both Elk-1 and cAMP response element-binding protein to control long-term potentiation-dependent gene expression in the dentate gyrus in vivo. J Neurosci 20:4563-4572.

20.

Deak

Clifton

Lucocq

Alessi

(1998) Mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase-1 (MSK1) is directly activated by MAPK and SAPK2/p38, and may mediate activation of CREB. EMBO J 17:4426-4441.

21.

Deutsch

Hoeffler

Jameson

Lin

Habener

(1988) Structural determinants for transcriptional activation by cAMP-responsive DNA elements. J Biol Chem 263:18466-18472.

22.

Doi

Ishida

Miyake

Sato

Komatsu

Yamazaki

Kimura

Tsuchiya

Kori

Seo

et al . (2011) Circadian regulation of intracellular G-protein signalling mediates intercellular synchrony and rhythmicity in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Nat Commun 2:327.

23.

Dziema

Oatis

Butcher

Yates

Hoyt

Obrietan

(2003) The ERK/MAP kinase pathway couples light to immediate-early gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Eur J Neurosci 17:1617-1627.

24.

Enslen

Tokumitsu

Soderling

(1995) Phosphorylation of CREB by CaM-kinase IV activated by CaM-kinase IV kinase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 207:1038-1043.

25.

Gandolfi

Cerri

Mapelli

Polimeni

Tritto

Fuzzati-Armentero

M-T

Bigiani

Blandini

Mapelli

D’Angelo

(2017) Activation of the CREB/c-Fos pathway during long-term synaptic plasticity in the cerebellum granular layer. Front Cell Neurosci 11.

26.

Gau

Lemberger

von Gall

Kretz

Le Minh

Gass

Schmid

Schibler

Korf

Schütz

(2002) Phosphorylation of CREB Ser142 regulates light-induced phase shifts of the circadian clock. Neuron 34:245-253.

27.

Ginty

Bonni

Greenberg

(1994) Nerve growth factor activates a Ras-dependent protein kinase that stimulates c-fos transcription via phosphorylation of CREB. Cell 77:713-725.

28.

Ginty

Kornhauser

Thompson

Bading

Mayo

Takahashi

Greenberg

(1993) Regulation of CREB phosphorylation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus by light and a circadian clock. Science 260:238-241.

29.

Gonzalez

Montminy

(1989) Cyclic AMP stimulates somatostatin gene transcription by phosphorylation of CREB at serine 133. Cell 59:675-680.

30.

Guido

de Guido

Goguen

Robertson

Rusak

(1999) Daily rhythm of spontaneous immediate-early gene expression in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Biol Rhythms 14:275-280.

31.

Guido

Goguen

Robertson

Rusak

(1996) Spontaneous and light-evoked expression of JunB-like protein in the hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus near subjective dawn. Neurosci Lett 217:9-12.

32.

Hansen

Karelina

Sakamoto

Wayman

Impey

Obrietan

(2013) miRNA-132: a dynamic regulator of cognitive capacity. Brain Struct Funct 218:817-831.

33.

Härtig

Loncarević

Büscher

Herrlich

Rahmsdorf

(1991) A new cAMP response element in the transcribed region of the human c-fos gene. Nucleic Acids Res 19:4153-4159.

34.

Hastings

Brancaccio

Maywood

(2014) Circadian pacemaking in cells and circuits of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Neuroendocrinol 26:2-10.

35.

Hastings

Field

Maywood

Weaver

Reppert

(1999) Differential regulation of mPER1 and mTIM proteins in the mouse suprachiasmatic nuclei: New insights into a core clock mechanism. J Neurosci 19:RC11-RC11.

36.

Hughes

ATL

Guilding

Lennox

Samuels

McMahon

Piggins

(2008) Live imaging of altered period1 expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of Vipr2-/- mice. J Neurochem 106:1646-1657.

37.

Hummler

Cole

Blendy

Ganss

Aguzzi

Schmid

Beermann

Schütz

(1994) Targeted mutation of the CREB gene: compensation within the CREB/ATF family of transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:5647-5651.

38.

Inagaki

Honma

Ono

Tanahashi

Honma

(2007) Separate oscillating cell groups in mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus couple photoperiodically to the onset and end of daily activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:7664-7669.

39.

Jagannath

Butler

Godinho

SIH

Couch

Brown

Vasudevan

Flanagan

Anthony

Churchill

Wood

MJA

et al . (2013) The CRTC1-SIK1 pathway regulates entrainment of the circadian clock. Cell 154:1100-1111.

40.

Klemm

Roesler

Boras

Colton

Felder

Reusch

(1998) Insulin stimulates cAMP-response element binding protein activity in HepG2 and 3T3-L1 cell lines. J Biol Chem 273:917-923.

41.

Takahashi

(2006) Molecular components of the mammalian circadian clock. Hum Mol Genet 15:R271-R277.

42.

Kornhauser

Nelson

Mayo

Takahashi

(1992) Regulation of jun-B messenger RNA and AP-1 activity by light and a circadian clock. Science 255:1581-1584.

43.

Lamarre-Vincent

Hsieh-Wilson

(2003) Dynamic glycosylation of the transcription factor CREB: a potential role in gene regulation. J Am Chem Soc 125:6612-6613.

44.

Lee

Hansen

Cao

Yoon

Obrietan

(2010) CREB influences timing and entrainment of the SCN circadian clock. J Biol Rhythms 25:410-420.

45.

Lonze

Ginty

(2002) Function and regulation of CREB family transcription factors in the nervous system. Neuron 35:605-623.

46.

Hutchins

Doyle

Lundblad

Kwok

RPS

(2003) Acetylation of cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB) by CREB-binding protein enhances CREB-dependent transcription. J Biol Chem 278:15727-15734.

47.

Matthews

Guthrie

Wailes

Zhao

Means

McKnight

(1994) Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase types II and IV differentially regulate CREB-dependent gene expression. Mol Cell Biol 14:6107-6116.

48.

Mayr

Montminy

(2001) Transcriptional regulation by the phosphorylation-dependent factor CREB. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:599-609.

49.

Maywood

Reddy

Wong

GKY

O’Neill

O’Brien

McMahon

Harmar

Okamura

Hastings

(2006) Synchronization and maintenance of timekeeping in suprachiasmatic circadian clock cells by neuropeptidergic signaling. Curr Biol 16:599-605.

50.

Miller

McAuley

Pang

KCH

(2005) Spontaneous fos expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of young and old mice. Neurobiol Aging 26:1107-1115.

51.

Montminy

Bilezikjian

(1987) Binding of a nuclear protein to the cyclic-AMP response element of the somatostatin gene. Nature 328:175-178.

52.

Nakajima

Kusafuka

Takeda

Fujitani

Nakae

Hirano

(1993) Identification of a novel interleukin-6 response element containing an Ets-binding site and a CRE-like site in the junB promoter. Mol Cell Biol 13:3027-3041.

53.

Naqvi

Martin

Arthur

JSC

(2014) CREB phosphorylation at Ser133 regulates transcription via distinct mechanisms downstream of cAMP and MAPK signalling. Biochem J 458:469-479.

54.

Nonaka

Kim

Fukushima

Sasaki

Suzuki

Okamura

Ishii

Kawashima

Kamijo

Takemoto-Kimura

et al . (2014) Region-specific activation of CRTC1-CREB signaling mediates long-term fear memory. Neuron 84:92-106.

55.

Obrietan

Impey

Smith

Athos

Storm

(1999) Circadian regulation of cAMP response element-mediated gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei. J Biol Chem 274: 17748-17756.

56.

Obrietan

Impey

Storm

(1998) Light and circadian rhythmicity regulate MAP kinase activation in the suprachiasmatic nuclei. Nat Neurosci 1:693-700.

57.

O’Neill

Maywood

Chesham

Takahashi

Hastings

(2008) cAMP-dependent signaling as a core component of the mammalian circadian pacemaker. Science 320:949-953.

58.

Pardy

Adan

Carter

Seah

Burbach

Murphy

(1992) The identification of a cis-acting element involved in cyclic 3’,5’-adenosine monophosphate regulation of bovine vasopressin gene expression. J Biol Chem 267:21746-21752.

59.

Parker

Ferreri

Nakajima

LaMorte

Evans

Koerber

Hoeger

Montminy

(1996) Phosphorylation of CREB at Serine 133 induces complex formation with CREB-binding protein via a direct mechanism. Mol Cell Biol 16:694-703.

60.

Parra-Damas

Rubió-Ferrarons

Shen

Saura

(2017) CRTC1 mediates preferential transcription at neuronal activity-regulated CRE/TATA promoters. Sci Rep 7:18004.

61.

Partch

Green

Takahashi

(2014) Molecular architecture of the mammalian circadian clock. Trends Cell Biol 24:90-99.

62.

Pham

Impey

Storm

Stryker

(1999) CRE-mediated gene transcription in neocortical neuronal plasticity during the developmental critical period. Neuron 22:63-72.

63.

Phinney

Keiper

Francis

Ryder

(1994) Quantitative analysis of the contribution made by 5’-flanking and 3’-flanking sequences to the transcriptional regulation of junB by growth factors. Oncogene 9:2353-2362.

64.

Roy

Jana

Corbett

Ramaswamy

Kordower

Gonzalez

Pahan

(2013) Regulation of CREB and hippocampal plasticity-related genes by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α. Cell Rep 4:724-737.

65.

Rusak

McNaughton

Robertson

Hunt

(1992) Circadian variation in photic regulation of immediate-early gene mRNAs in rat suprachiasmatic nucleus cells. Mol Brain Res 14:124-130.

66.

Rusak

Robertson

Wisden

Hunt

(1990) Light pulses that shift rhythms induce gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Science 248:1237-1240.

67.

Sage

Unser

Salmon

Dibner

(2010) A software solution for recording circadian oscillator features in time-lapse live cell microscopy. Cell Div 5:17.

68.

Sakamoto

Karelina

Obrietan

(2011) CREB: a multifaceted regulator of neuronal plasticity and protection. J Neurochem 116:1-9.

69.

Sakamoto

Norona

Alzate-Correa

Scarberry

Hoyt

Obrietan

(2013) Clock and light regulation of the CREB coactivator CRTC1 in the suprachiasmatic circadian clock. J Neurosci 33:9021-9027.

70.

Schwartz

Carpino

de la Iglesia

Baler

Klein

Nakabeppu

Aronin

(2000) Differential regulation of fos family genes in the ventrolateral and dorsomedial subdivisions of the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus. Neuroscience 98:535-547.

71.

Schwartz

Zimmerman

(1990) Circadian timekeeping in BALB/c and C57BL/6 inbred mouse strains. J Neurosci 10:3685-3694.

72.

Sheng

McFadden

Greenberg

(1990) Membrane depolarization and calcium induce c-fos transcription via phosphorylation of transcription factor CREB. Neuron 4:571-582.

73.

Sun

Enslen

Myung

Maurer

(1994) Differential activation of CREB by Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases type II and type IV involves phosphorylation of a site that negatively regulates activity. Genes Dev 8:2527-2539.

74.

Sun

Schoderbek

Maurer

(1992) Phosphorylation of cyclic adenosine 3’,5’-monophosphate (cAMP) response element-binding protein isoforms by the cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Mol Endocrinol 6:1858-1866.

75.

Tischkau

Mitchell

Tyan

S-H

Buchanan

Gillette

(2003) Ca2+/cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB)-dependent activation of per1 is required for light-induced signaling in the suprachiasmatic nucleus circadian clock. J Biol Chem 278:718-723.

76.

Travnickova-Bendova

Cermakian

Reppert

Sassone-Corsi

(2002) Bimodal regulation of mPeriod promoters by CREB-dependent signaling and CLOCK/BMAL1 activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:7728-7733.

77.

Wingate

Martin

Hunter

Carr

Clacher

Arthur

JSC

(2009) Generation of a conditional CREB Ser133Ala knockin mouse. Genesis 47:688-696.

78.

Anafi

Hughes

Kornacker

Hogenesch

(2016) MetaCycle: an integrated R package to evaluate periodicity in large scale data. Bioinforma 32:3351-3353.

79.

Yan

Silver

(2004) Resetting the brain clock: time course and localization of mPER1 and mPER2 protein expression in suprachiasmatic nuclei during phase shifts. Eur J Neurosci 19: 1105-1109.

The Phosphorylation of CREB at Serine 133 Is a Key Event for Circadian Clock Timing and Entrainment in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus

Abstract

Keywords

Materials and Methods

Mice

Behavioral Assessment of Circadian Clock Timing and Entrainment

Assessment of Circadian and Light-entrainment Phenotypes

Brain Tissue Processing

Immunolabeling

Image Quantitation

Cresyl Violet Staining

Slice Imaging

Slice Analysis

Results

Discussion

Overview of the Study: Rationale and Findings

CREB and Light Entrainment

Circadian Timing and Clock-driven Gene Expression

CREB, Cellular Oscillator Synchrony and Circadian Timing

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Conflict of Interest Statement

ORCID iDs

References