The Potential for Bias Due to Attrition in the national Exposure Registry: An Examination of Reasons for Nonresponse,Nonrespondent Characteristics,and the Response Rate

Abstract

This study examined attrition in the Trichloroethylene (TCE) Subregistry of the National Exposure Registry (NER). The analyses focused on 3915 persons exposed to the chemical TCE through the drinking water in their home. Baseline data were compared for subgroups of the TCE Subregistry members who were eligible to participate in the first TCE Subregistry follow-up. Study members were grouped according to their participation status in the first follow-up: remainers (n = 3494) and losses (n = 421), and three subgroups of losses: refusals, unable to locate, and unable to contact. The comparison of demographic variables of remainers and losses revealed that remainers had a higher percent of females, currently smoked less, were older, and fewer had no education and more had education beyond high school. These differences occurred for the losses subgroups unable to locate and unable to contact, however, not for refusals. The comparison of reporting rates of remainers and losses for 23 health outcomes revealed statistically significant decreases by losses for five health conditions but the pattern of statistically significant differences for the losses subgroups was not clear-cut. Altogether, the analyses indicated that the potential for bias due to attrition was minimal.

Keywords

attrition longitudinal survey registry response rates

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AGENCY FOR TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND DISEASE REGISTRY (ATSDR) (1988). National Exposure Registry: Policies and Procedures Manual (Revised). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Atlanta, GA.

AGENCY FOR TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND DISEASE REGISTRY (ATSDR) (1994). National Exposure Registry Trichloroethylene (TCE) Subregistry Baseline Report. (Revised). 1994. PB95–154571. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Atlanta, GA.

Austin

Criqui

Barrett-Conner

Holdbrook

(1981). “The effect of response bias on the odds ratio.” Am. J. Epidem. 114:137–143.

Campbell

D.T.

Stanley

J.C.

(1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally, Chicago, IL p. 6.

Cobb

King

Chen

(1957). “Differences between respondents and nonrespondents in a morbidity survey involving clinical examination.” J. Chr. Dis. 6:95–108.

Cooney

Schaie

Willis

(1988). “The relationship between prior functioning on cognitive and personality dimensions and subject attrition in longitudinal research.” J. Gerontol. 43:12–17.

Cordray

Polk

(1983). “The implications of respondent loss in panel studies of deviant behavior”. J. ResCrime Delinquency 20:214–242.

Cottler

Zipp

Robins

Spitzangel

(1987). “Difficult-to-recruit respondents and their effect on prevalence estimates in an epidemiological survey.” Am. J. Epidem. 125:329–339.

Crespi

(1987). “Surveys as legal evidence.” Public Opinion Quart. 51:84–91.

10.

Criqui

Barrett-Conner

Austin

(1978). “Differences between respondents and non-respondents in a population-based cardiovascular disease study.” Am. J. Epidem. 108:367–372.

11.

Eaton

W.W.

Anthony

J.C.

Tepper

Dryman

(1992). “Psychopathology and attrition in the epidemiologic catchment area surveys.” Am. J. Epidem. 135(9):1051–1171.

12.

Gist

G.L.

Burg

J.R.

Radtke

T.M.

(1994). “The site selection process for the National Exposure Registry” 56(6):7–12.

13.

Goudy

W.J.

(1976). “Nonresponse effects on relationships between variables.” Public Opinion Quart. 40:360–369.

14.

Goyder

(1987). The Silent Minority. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

15.

Greenland

(1977). “Response and follow-up bias in cohort studies.” Am. J. Epidem. 106:184–187.

16.

Groves

Lyberg

(1988). “An overview of nonresponse issues in telephone surveys.” In: Telephone Survey Methodology ( Groves

Beimer

, eds.). John Wiley #38;#38; Sons, New York, NY. pp. 191–211.

17.

Herzog

Rogers

(1988). “Age and response rates to interview sample surveys.” J. Gerontol. 43:200–205.

18.

Launer

Wind

Deeg

(1994). “Nonresponse pattern and bias in a community based cross-sectional study of cognition functioning.” Am. J. Epidem. 139:803–812.

19.

Liu

Anthony

(1989). “Using the ‘mini-mental state’ examination to predict elderly subjects' completion of a follow-up interview.” Am. J. Epidem. 130:416–426.

20.

Rosenkranz

E.J.

(1984). “The pollution exclusion clause through the looking glass.” Georgetown Law J. 74:1237–1300.

21.

Vernon

Roberts

Eun

S.L.

(1984). “Ethnic status and participation in longitudinal health surveys.” Am. J. Epidem. 119:99–113.

22.

Vonkorff

Cottler

George

Eaton

Leaf

Burnam

(1985). “Nonresponse and nonresponse bias in the ECA surveys.” In: Epidemiological Field Methods in Psychiatry: The NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program. ( Eaton

Kessler

, eds.). Academic Press, New York, NY. pp. 85–98.

23.

Wilhelmsen

Ljunberg

Wedel

WëRko

(1976). “A comparison between participants and non-participants in a primary preventive trial.” J. Chr. Dis. 29:331–339.